Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Saulsbury Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$356k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$2.6MPhilanthropy$442kHuman Services$186kFood & Nutrition$132kHealth$110kYouth Development$60kRecreation & Sports$40kArts & Culture$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ODESSA COLLEGE$300,000
THE LIFE CENTER$10,000
HIGH SKY CHILDREN'S RANCH$6,000
WEST TEXAS SYMPHONY$5,000
FIRST PRIORITY PERMIAN BASIN$5,000
PERMIAN BASIN MISSION CENTER$5,000
PERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS ODESSA$5,000
SAND HILLS STOCK SHOW & RODEO$5,000
WEST TEXAS GIFTS OF HOPE INC$5,000
WAGNER NOEL PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$3,487
ELLEN NOEL ART MUSEUM$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 23%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 23%PERMIAN BASIN MISSION CENTER: $5k → 16%PERMIAN BASIN MISSION CENTER: $5k → 16%PERMIAN BASIN MISSION CENTER: $5k → 16%PERMIAN BASIN MISSION CENTER: $5k → 16%PERMIAN BASIN MISSION CENTER: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 24 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
3

Total granted

$3.6M
$12k

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IP
    IDEA Public Schools
    3× · 2019–2023 · $571k · revenue +123%
  • WT
    WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK
    2× · 2017–2020 · $102k · revenue +111%
  • WT
    WEST TEXAS GIFTS OF HOPE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +202%

Funded once

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS ODESS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • FO
    FIRST ODESSA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • LC
    LION'S CLUB FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Opportunities of the Permian Basin Inc

To provide a positive learning experience in a safe and healthy environment that will improve the quality of life for the children, service, and empower them to become self-sufficient, contributing members of the community.

Human Services
2
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
3
Panhandle Behavioral Services Inc
Health
4
Permian Basin Area Foundation

Permian Basin Area Foundation exists to partner with donors in creating permanent charitable funds to enrich the quality of life in West Texas communities.

Philanthropy
5
United Way of Odessa Inc

Improve lives by mobilizing the power of our community to advance the common good through the annual campaign used to allocate funds to 15 partner agencies who provide services in the following areas improving peoples mental and physical…

Philanthropy
6
Odessa Affordable Housing Inc

To improve housing conditions within Odessa, Texas through credit counseling, homebuyer education and home building/ rehabilitation programs that is affordable for low to moderate income residents.

Housing & Shelter
7
Education Partnership of the Permian Basin

The organizations mission is to raise awareness and to improve the education of persons living in the Permian Basin.

Education
8
Samaritan Center Inc

Providing mental healthcare to restore hope and healing

Human Services
9
Boys and Girls Club of Midland Inc

To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
10
West Texas Hero Homes Inc

Support of special needs military or first responders and their families.

Housing & Shelter
11
Boys and Girls Clubs of the Permian Basin Inc

To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
12
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Permian Basin Rehabilitation Center and the most unlike its peers is Permian Basin First Priority. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ODESSA COLLEGE — $2,000,000 · OtherODESSA COLLEGEUTPB — $400,000 · OtherUTPBWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK — $101,500 · Other+14 more — $278,874 · Other+14 moreIDEA Public Schools — $571,432 · EducationIDEA Public School…+1 more — $3,000 · EducationPERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER — $45,275 · HealthHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC — $38,000 · HealthWEST TEXAS GIFTS OF HOPE INC — $33,000 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA — $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentPERMIAN BASIN MISSION CENTER — $25,000 · Human ServicesMidland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc — $10,000 · Arts & CultureELLEN NOEL ART MUSEUM OF THE PERMIAN BASIN — $7,150 · Arts & CulturePERMIAN BASIN FIRST PRIORITY — $12,500 · Religion
Other$2,780,374Education$574,432Health$116,275Youth Development$60,000Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$17,150Religion$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIDEA Public Schools — $571,432 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK — $101,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA — $60,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER — $45,275 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC — $38,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWEST TEXAS GIFTS OF HOPE INC — $33,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ODESSA INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN MISSION CENTER — $25,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetMARC INC — $16,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN FIRST PRIORITY — $12,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMidland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetELLEN NOEL ART MUSEUM OF THE PERMIAN BASIN — $7,150 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IDEA Public Schools
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER
  • Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS GIFTS OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ODESSA INC
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN MISSION CENTER
  • Who funds MARC INC
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN FIRST PRIORITY
  • Who funds Midland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc
  • Who funds ELLEN NOEL ART MUSEUM OF THE PERMIAN BASIN
  • Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

JC Ferguson Foundation IncTX24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: JC Ferguson Foundation Inc · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Hext Family Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Warren Charitable Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Wood Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Saulsbury Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph