· Private foundation
Sauerland Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $835k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $815k
- $250k+3 grants · $760k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH | $260,000 |
| CLEVELAND FOODBANK | $250,000 |
| CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART | $250,000 |
| FRIENDS OF INTERGENERATIONAL SCHOOL | $120,000 |
| GREATER CLEVE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $100,000 |
| THE HOMELESS CHARITY | $90,000 |
| UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HHI | $75,000 |
| CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY | $75,000 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION H&V | $75,000 |
| COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND | $60,000 |
| AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY | $60,000 |
| ACLU OF OHIO FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| THE HAVEN HOME LLC | $50,000 |
| OPEN DOORS ACADEMY | $50,000 |
| PEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $667k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
58 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC6× · 2020–2025 · $505k · revenue +10%
- SSSHAKER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $172k · revenue +86%
- THTHE HOMELESS CHARITY3× · 2023–2025 · $167k · revenue +96% · 37% of their budget
Funded once
- GAGRID ALTERNATIVESone grant, 2024 · $70k
- FUFLORESTA USA INCORPORATEDgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +43%
- CCISEone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.
Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…
See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
To resolve serious legal problems of low income people, to promote economic and family stability, and reduce poverty through effective legal assistance.
Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
See schedule o.legal aid's mission is to secure justice, equity and access to opportunity for and with people who have low incomes through passionate legal representation and advocacy for systematic change.
Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…
The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Learning Grove Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Bremen Historic Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds SHAKER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HOMELESS CHARITY ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds THE HAVEN HOME LLC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LIFE COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RID-ALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds TREES FOR THE FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI WORKS ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Clermont Senior Services Inc ↗
- Who funds SonLight Power Inc ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOORS INC ↗
- Who funds EDWINS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ONE TREE PLANTED INC ↗
- Who funds Shelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Prospect House Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FIRST STEP HOME INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER MILFORD AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FUNDAMAYA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · The Cleveland Foundation · Spaulding Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sauerland Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sauerland Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Sauerland Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.