Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sarah Tod Fund Dtd 121454

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$433k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$1.4MInternational$455kArts & Culture$448kEnvironment$199kHealth$130kPublic Safety & Disaster$84kPhilanthropy$71kAnimals$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $251k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD COLLEGE$100,000
FRIENDS OF MAURICE SENDAK FOUNDATION$50,000
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$35,000
MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION$30,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$25,000
THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP$25,000
FRIENDS OF HARVARD SQUARE$25,000
THE BREARLEY SCHOOL$11,000
THREE LAKES COUNCIL$10,000
COLONY CLUB$10,000
STREET SQUASH$10,000
KEELER TAVERN MUSEUM$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY$10,000
WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER$10,000
COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%SEARCH AND CARE: $5k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $2k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $1k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $1k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $1k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
WI
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 50 repeat orgs$277k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
18

Total granted

$2.6M
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+47%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wellesley College
    6× · 2018–2025 · $390k · revenue +81%
  • TB
    THE BREARLEY SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $218k · revenue +15%
  • TA
    THE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $140k · revenue +169%

Funded once

  • TR
    THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE WASHINGTON STATUE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • TH
    THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Governors Island Corporation

The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…

Animals
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
4
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
5
Harvard Club of Ny Historical Foundation
Environment
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
101 East 69TH Street Conservancy

Enhance the preservation, renovation & renewal of buildings of historical significance

Arts & Culture
8
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
9
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
10
The Economic Club of New York

The economic club of new york is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, nonpolitical organization dedicated to the promotion of the study and discussion of social, economic and political questions. for more than a century, the club has served as the…

Social Science
11
The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

—
12
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Harvard Square Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
31/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARVARD COLLEGE: $460,000 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGEAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ROYAL FOUNDATION: $455,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ROYAL FOUNDATIONCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · OtherTHE TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK SOCIETY LIBRARY: $60,000 · OtherRIDGEFIELD EMERGENCY FUND: $59,500 · Other+45 more: $542,500 · Other+45 moreWellesley College: $390,000 · EducationWellesley CollegeTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL: $217,600 · EducationTHE BREARLEY SCHOOLTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $105,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE…+4 more: $38,300 · EducationTHE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM INC: $140,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ALDRICH…PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $40,000 · Arts & CulturePEN AMERICA…METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $34,500 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITA…Friends of Harvard Square Inc: $25,000 · Arts & CultureFriends of …KEELER TAVERN: $24,500 · Arts & CultureKEELER TAVE…FRIENDS OF THE WASHINGTON STATUE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF …+3 more: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $75,000 · AnimalsWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $40,000 · AnimalsMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Human ServicesSEARCH AND CARE INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesMYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $16,000 · HealthCHAPEL HAVEN SCHLEIFER CENTER INC: $4,000 · HealthSTREETSQUASH INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $17,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,712,000Education$750,900Arts & Culture$304,000Animals$115,000Human Services$56,000Health$50,000Recreation & Sports$37,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWellesley College: $390,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL: $217,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM INC: $140,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $105,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK SOCIETY LIBRARY: $60,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $34,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKEELER TAVERN: $24,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WASHINGTON STATUE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetSTREETSQUASH INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican School in London Foundation: $19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $17,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGEFIELD VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $16,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $15,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN-SCOTTISH FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetFUND FOR PARK AVENUE NEW YORK INC: $13,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHREE LAKES COUNCIL INC: $12,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetSEARCH AND CARE INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOLONY CLUB: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGEFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $9,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF RIDGEFIELD INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetA BETTER CHANCE INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAPEL HAVEN SCHLEIFER CENTER INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRVNAHEALTH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKS SCHOOL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget122 EAST 66TH STREET FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wellesley College ↗
  • Who funds THE BREARLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK SOCIETY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Harvard Square Inc ↗
  • Who funds KEELER TAVERN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WASHINGTON STATUE INC ↗
  • Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds American School in London Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds RIDGEFIELD VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLPNY17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLP · Pf & Rj Morganti Foundation · Taylor-Zemo Foundation Inc · Anne S Richardson Fund Xxxxx3004 · Ridgefield Thrift Shop Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Newcomb-Hargraves Foundation · The Goldstone Family Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Synchrony Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Ibm International Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sarah Tod Fund Dtd 121454 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sarah Tod Fund Dtd 121454. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Chapel Haven Schleifer Center Inc: 13% of income from government
  • The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Ridgefield Historical Society Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Rvnahealth Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sarah Tod Fund Dtd 121454?

Find your warmest path to Sarah Tod Fund Dtd 121454 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sarah Tod Fund Dtd 121454’s filings →

More from the funding graph