· Private foundation
The Goldstone Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k110 grants · $176k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $458k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $516k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NUVANCE HEALTH | $200,000 |
| THE ALDRICH MUSEUM | $95,500 |
| GROOVE WITH ME | $95,000 |
| CYC LAKE ASSOCIATION | $75,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR IMPACT COMMUNICATION | $50,000 |
| ACT OF CONNECTICUT THEATRE | $47,018 |
| Individual grant recipient | $35,500 |
| ROUNDABOUT THEATRE | $35,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $25,000 |
| LOUNSBURY HOUSE | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $23,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| PROSPECTS OPPORTUNITY AND ENRICHMENT INC | $20,000 |
| ROYAL FAMILY PRODUCTIONS INC | $20,000 |
| RIDGEFIELD SOCIAL SERVICES | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $394k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
145 repeat relationships — 113 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHousatonic Habitat for Humanity8× · 2017–2024 · $341k · revenue +208%
- CLCOBBOSSEECONTEE LAKE ASSOCIATION2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +20%
- TCThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $121k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- FSFLEMING STREET FAITH CENTER INCone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -27%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $35k
- NHNUVANCE HOSPITALone grant, 2020 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.
Rockefeller philanthropy advisors aims to accelerate philanthropy in pursuit of a just world
The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…
The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…
Rockaway film festival presents cinema and other arts at the coastal edge of new york city, joining artists and audiences for unique collective experiences.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The r street institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public-policy research organization ("think tank"). our mission is to engage in policy research and outreach to promote free markets and limited, effective government. (continued on…
The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Art Therapy Project Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Fleming Street Faith Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
127 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 127 of the 229 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds Housatonic Habitat for Humanity ↗
- Who funds GROOVE WITH ME INC ↗
- Who funds PROSPECTS OPPORTUNITY AND ENRICHMENT INC ↗
- Who funds COBBOSSEECONTEE LAKE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The Center For Empowerment And Education Inc ↗
- Who funds THE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Ridgefield Library Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds KEELER TAVERN ↗
- Who funds ST LUKE'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RIDGEFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds RIDGEFIELD WORKSHOP FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds ROYAL FAMILY PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIOS OF KEY WEST ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR IMPACT COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds FLEMING STREET FAITH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC ↗
- Who funds UNDERSTOOD FOR ALL INC ↗
- Who funds MAHLER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIDGEFIELD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ridgefield Thrift Shop Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Taylor-Zemo Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation Inc C/O Joel E Sammet & Co LLP · Synchrony Foundation · Anne S Richardson Fund Xxxxx3004 · Patrick Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Barker Welfare Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Goldstone Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Christopher Reeve Foundation — 49% of income from government
- Rides for Ridgefield Inc — 39% of income from government
- Ridgefield Youth Service Bureau Inc — 31% of income from government
- Christian Community Action Inc — 29% of income from government
- Ridgefield Independent Film Festival — 24% of income from government
- The Open Door Shelter Inc — 14% of income from government
- Thrown Stone Theatre Company — 13% of income from government
- Shelburne Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
- Ridgefield Historical Society Inc — 7% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Upstream Usa Inc — 4% of income from government
- Cartie Corp — 3% of income from government
- Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra Inc — 2% of income from government
- Rvnahealth Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Ridgefield Playhouse for Movies and the Performing Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- St Luke's Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Fleming Street Faith Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.