Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
101
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$5.7MPhilanthropy$5.1MEmployment$4.9MArts & Culture$4.8MHealth$4.0MFood & Nutrition$2.7MYouth Development$2.6MHuman Services$2.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 101 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k66 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+12 grants · $8.9M
$30,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,350,000
A NEW LEAF$1,200,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$1,000,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000,000
TULSA LIBRARY TRUST$1,000,000
GKFF - GATHERING PLACE PHASE II$750,000
HUMBLE SONS BIKE COMPANY$625,000
VHIT LLC (VETERANS HOSPITAL-ZARROWTCF)$600,000
Individual grant recipient$500,000
HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA$325,000
HOPE OUTREACH PREVENTION EDUCATION INC$285,000
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$250,000
TULSA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$212,000
RESTORE HOPE MINISTRIES$180,000
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA-SOCIAL JUSTICE CENTER (BUCK COLBERT)$178,040
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $20k → 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $20k → 14%THE COMMON GOOD: $20k → 14%DOMESTIC VIOLANCE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $125k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLANCE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $25k → 15%DVIS: $25k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $250k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $250k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $50k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $50k → 15%TULSA DEBATE LEAGUE: $40k → 15%TULSA DEBATE LEAGUE: $30k → 15%TULSA DEBATE LEAGUE: $30k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $25k → 15%TULSA DEBATE LEAGUE: $20k → 15%GROWING TOGETHER: $30k → 15%GROWING TOGETHER: $30k → 15%GROWING TOGETHER: $30k → 15%SPRING SHELTER: $25k → 15%TULSA BOYS HOME: $25k → 15%SPRING SHELTER: $25k → 15%TULSA BOYS HOME: $25k → 15%YWCA TULSA: $25k → 15%CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $65k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $50k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $35k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $35k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $30k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $25k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $25k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $25k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $26k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $25k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $55k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $50k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $50k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $50k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $30k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $30k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $30k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $25k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $25k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $25k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $25k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $25k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
OR
MO
MD
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34M · 114 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

114 repeat relationships: 80 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

114
28

Total granted

$34M
$616k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
0%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A NEW LEAF INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.9M · revenue +136%
  • HS
    HUMBLE SONS BIKE COMPANY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue ×25 · 39% of their budget
  • The University of Tulsa
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • OS
    OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY AVIATION SCHOLARS (COMMONS ROOM)
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • TI
    TULSA IMMIGRANT RELIEF FUND - TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $70k
  • SS
    Sand Springs Park Friends Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
2
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
3
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
4
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
5
Tulsa School of Arts and Sciences

The mission of tsas middle and high school is to provide students a multi-strand liberal arts education in a safe, supportive, individualized and challenging school environment through a college preparatory curriculum.

Education
6
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
7
Tulsa Community Loan Fund Inc

To support community efforts to provide a greater supply of affordable housing in tulsa county and the surrounding area.

Housing & Shelter
8
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
9
Tulsa Classroom Teachers Association Inc

To strengthen the institutions in which we work, to improve the quality of the services we provide, to bring together all members to assist and support one another, and to promote democracy, human rights, and freedom in our association.

—
10
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
11
Tulsa County Bar Foundation Inc

To promote ethical conduct among attorneys, to advance the effective administration of our judicial system, to ensure equal access to justice for all citizens and to engender respect for the legal profession, the law and the governing…

Crime & Legal
12
Housing Partners of Tulsa

To provide a wide-range of affordable housing options for low and moderate income tulsans and to promote programs leading to self-sufficiency and home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
94/96
Grantees still filing
66/96
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

A NEW LEAF INC: $4,888,312 · OtherA NEW LEAF INCGILCREASE MUSEUM: $2,530,000 · OtherGILCREASE MUSEUMVHIT LLC (VETERANS HOSPITAL-ZARROWTCF): $1,800,000 · OtherVHIT LLC (VETERANS HOSPITAL-ZARROWTCF)TEMPLE ISRAEL: $1,001,803 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000,500 · OtherTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $801,000 · Other+102 more: $11,521,709 · Other+102 moreThe University of Tulsa: $1,565,880 · EducationThe Universi…Tulsa Library Trust: $1,000,000 · EducationTulsa Librar…READING PARTNERS: $410,000 · EducationREADING PART…Tulsa Community College Foundation: $350,000 · EducationTulsa Commun…Oklahoma State University Foundation: $250,000 · EducationOklahoma Sta…STREET SCHOOL INC: $200,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc: $170,000 · EducationTULSA LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL: $160,000 · Education+7 more: $497,500 · Education+7 moreTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,358,425 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMM…JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA: $285,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FED…+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $1,295,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $705,000 · Food & NutritionHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $565,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $25,000 · Food & NutritionLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $600,000 · Human ServicesFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $306,000 · Human ServicesEmergency Infant Services Inc: $255,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $235,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesTULSA DEBATE LEAGUE INCORPORATED: $145,000 · Human ServicesBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc: $125,000 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $111,000 · Human ServicesGROWING TOGETHER INC: $90,000 · Human Services+14 more: $340,000 · Human ServicesTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $515,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC: $225,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $146,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA GIRLS ART SCHOOL PROJECT INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $82,322 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $65,000 · Arts & CultureHUMBLE SONS BIKE COMPANY: $1,888,106 · Youth Development+2 more: $30,000 · Youth Development
Other$23,543,324Education$4,603,380Philanthropy$3,653,425Food & Nutrition$2,590,000Human Services$2,417,000Arts & Culture$2,133,322Youth Development$1,918,106

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA NEW LEAF INC: $4,888,312 over 8y, 15% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,358,425 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHUMBLE SONS BIKE COMPANY: $1,888,106 over 8y, 39% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $1,565,880 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $1,295,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTulsa Library Trust: $1,000,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $1,000,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $801,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $740,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $705,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $690,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc: $650,000 over 8y, 63% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $600,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $565,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $515,000 over 4y, 89% of budgetHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES: $490,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $410,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC: $375,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetTulsa Community College Foundation: $350,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetOKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INC: $338,100 over 8y, 7.9% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $306,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRESTORE HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $305,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA: $285,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC: $270,600 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $255,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $235,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetTULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC: $225,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $220,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $210,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSTREET SCHOOL INC: $200,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $170,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL: $160,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $146,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetThe Town & Country School Inc: $145,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTULSA HONOR ACADEMY INC: $145,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTULSA DEBATE LEAGUE INCORPORATED: $145,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc: $125,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY AND JUSTICE: $120,900 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetUNION SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetKIPP TULSA ACADEMY COLLEGE PREP INC: $117,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES: $115,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $111,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUP WITH TREES INC: $110,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetTulsa SPCA: $106,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSPAY OKLAHOMA INC: $105,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetRIVER PARKS AUTHORITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTULSA GIRLS ART SCHOOL PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds A NEW LEAF INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMBLE SONS BIKE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa Library Trust ↗
  • Who funds TULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma ↗
  • Who funds Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Family & Childrens Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds TULSA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK129.1× affinity63 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Coretz Family Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 380%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Up With Trees Inc: 100% of income from government
  • The Center for Housing Solutions Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services: 15% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Growing Together Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Ywca Tulsa Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Global Gardens Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
38get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee?

Find your warmest path to Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph