Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sander Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2020
14
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Education$168kReligion$83kHealth$63kYouth Development$12kArts & Culture$8kHuman Services$1k
02FY2020 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k11 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $78k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHER SEMINARY$77,500
SD MINES CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS AND ADVANCEMENT (CARA)$35,000
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN PLAINS$5,000
FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH$4,732
ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$2,500
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY$1,000
ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
SOUTH DAKOTA HALL OF FAME$1,000
FRIENDS OF SOUTH DAKOTA PUBLIC BROADCASTING$700
BROOKINGS HEALTH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION$500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$500
SOUTH DAKOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION$125
SOUTH DAKOTA ART MUSEUM$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$76k · 6 repeat orgs$258k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$76k
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
EducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BROOKINGS HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $53k · revenue +68%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN PLAINS INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $10k · revenue +174%
  • SD
    SOUTH DAKOTA HALL OF FAME
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • SD
    SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $128k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Dakota State University Alumni Association

Foster loyalty and fellowship among South Dakota State University Alumni, Faculty, Students and Former Students.

Education
2
Sd Association of Healthcare Organizations

Advancing healthy communities through a unified voice across the health care continuum.

—
3
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
4
Downtown Sioux Falls

Downtown Sioux Falls boldly leads the downtown community by championing diverse experiences, economic growth, and a healthy environment.

—
5
South Dakota Biotechnology Association

A south dakota alliance dedicated to the development of biotechnology industries through expansion of bio-based research, investment, education, advocacy, funding, education, infrastructure development, and promotion.

Community Improvement
6
South Dakota Retailers Association

Representing the interest of retail businesses who sell retail products and services throughout the state of south dakota.

—
7
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
8
South Dakota Rural Electric Association

To serve the rural electric cooperatives in south dakota, to promote the effective development of rural electrification in south dakota on a cooperative, non-profit basis.

—
9
South Dakota Education Association

To promote and protect quality education and all education employees.

—
10
South Dakota State Medical Association

The south dakota state medical association is devoted to promoting the art and science of medicine; protecting and improving the health of the public; and providing leadership and advocacy in the filed of quality healthcare.

—
11
South Dakota Dental Association

It is the mission of the south dakota dental association to promote the art and science of dentistry and the oral health of the public; educate the public on the benefits of quality preventative and restorative dentistry as provided by the…

—
12
South Dakota Association of Realtors Inc

As the voice for real estate, the south dakota association of realtors serves its local boards and all members by providing timely information, quality education, political advocacy and promoting the realtor image and code of ethics.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Dakota State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $128,091 · EducationSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONSDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT: $35,000 · EducationSDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT+1 more: $5,000 · EducationLUTHER SEMINARY: $77,500 · OtherLUTHER SEMINARYFIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $4,732 · OtherFIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH+3 more: $2,600 · OtherBROOKINGS HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $52,500 · HealthBROOKINGS HEALTH SYST…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE &…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN PLAINS INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTH DAKOTA HALL OF FAME: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH DAKOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $1,250 · Arts & CultureFriends of South Dakota Public Broadcasting: $700 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $1,000 · Human Services
Education$168,091Other$84,832Health$62,500Youth Development$10,000Arts & Culture$7,950Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $128,091 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBROOKINGS HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $52,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT: $35,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN PLAINS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA HALL OF FAME: $6,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEnterprise Institute: $5,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSIOUX COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of South Dakota Public Broadcasting: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Dakota Community FoundationSD17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Robert and Rita Elmen Foundation · Black Hills Area Community Foundation · Avera Health · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sander Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sander Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sander Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sander Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sander Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph