Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sandager Brigitte Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$179k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $172k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH AMERICAN BEAR CENTER$32,494
AMERICAN BEAR ASSOCIATION$25,000
PERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY$25,000
WORLD ANIMAL PROTECTION$20,000
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INC$20,000
WOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL$15,000
COMO FRIENDS$15,000
ANIMAL SANCTUARY OF THE ST CROIX VALLEY$10,000
ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
WILDLIFE REHAB CENTER$5,000
INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER$2,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ANIMAL SANCTUARY OF THE ST CROIX VALLEY: $10k → 6%NORTH AMERICAN BEAR CENTER: $32k → 8%ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 11%COMO FRIENDS: $15k → 14%AMERICAN BEAR ASSOCIATION: $25k → 15%PERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $25k → 12%WORLD ANIMAL PROTECTION: $20k → 17%HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INC: $20k → 14%WOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $15k → 9%INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER: $2k → 11%WILDLIFE REHAB CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
3
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

6
Wild Souls Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation
Animals
7
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
8
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
9
Bella View Farm Animal Sanctuary Inc
Animals
10
The Animal Welfare Foundation
11
Howlmore Animal Sanctuary Inc
Philanthropy
12
From the Heart Animal Sanctuary
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Wolf Center and the most unlike its peers is World Animal Protection. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN BEAR ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN BEAR ASSOCIATIONPERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY — $25,000 · AnimalsPERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETYHumane World for Animals Inc — $20,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncWORLD ANIMAL PROTECTION — $20,000 · AnimalsWORLD ANIMAL PROTECTIONWOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL — $15,000 · AnimalsWOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONALCOMO FRIENDS — $15,000 · AnimalsCOMO FRIENDSAnimal Humane Society — $10,000 · AnimalsAnimal Humane SocietyANIMAL SANCTUARY OF THE ST CROIX VALLEY — $10,000 · AnimalsANIMAL SANCTUARY OF THE ST CROIX VALLEY+1 more — $2,000 · AnimalsNORTH AMERICAN BEAR CENTER — $32,494 · Arts & CultureNORTH AMERICAN BEAR …WILDLIFE REHAB CENTER — $5,000 · Other
Animals$142,000Arts & Culture$32,494Other$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH AMERICAN BEAR CENTER — $32,494 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD ANIMAL PROTECTION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMO FRIENDS — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAnimal Humane Society — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Ibm International Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sandager Brigitte Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph