Skip to content
San Juan United Way at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

San Juan United Way

To improve living conditions for the people in san juan county by developing fundraising activities that will best impact the community needs by providing funding for their activities.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$653kHuman Services$552kHealth$260kHousing & Shelter$130kFood & Nutrition$110kPublic Safety & Disaster$103kCommunity Improvement$33kEducation$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $124,305 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $114,305 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Masada House Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $541k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%PATH-EMERGENCY SHELTER: $46k → 22%PATH-EMERGENCY SHELTER: $46k → 22%CHILDHAVEN-EMERGENCY: $45k → 22%CHILDHAVEN-EMERGENCY: $43k → 22%ECHO-FOODBANK: $40k → 22%ECHO-FOODBANK: $31k → 22%PATH-DAILY BREAD: $31k → 22%PATH-DAILY BREAD: $28k → 22%EHCO-PRESCHOOL: $26k → 22%EHCO-PRESCHOOL: $24k → 22%DESERT VIEW-ADULT SEXUAL ABUSE: $18k → 22%DESERT VIEW-YOP: $16k → 22%CHILDHAVEN-CASA: $14k → 22%DESERT VIEW-ADULT SEXUAL ABUSE: $14k → 22%CHILDHAVEN-CASA: $13k → 22%CHILDHAVEN-PARENT SUPPORT: $13k → 22%CHILDHAVEN-SAFEHOUSE: $13k → 22%DESERT VIEW-YOP: $12k → 22%CHILDHAVEN-SAFEHOUSE: $12k → 22%CHILDHAVEN-PARENT SUPPORT: $12k → 22%ECHO-FOODBANK: $11k → 22%Masada House Inc: $10k → 22%PATH-DAILY BREAD: $9k → 22%CHILDHAVEN-PARENT SUPPORT: $9k → 22%DESERT VIEW-CASE MANAGEMENT: $6k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 19 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
29

Total granted

$1.6M
$1.3M

Still filing today

68%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CHILDHAVEN INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $173k · revenue +20%
  • PA
    PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +19%
  • EC
    ECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $133k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $709k
  • AB
    AZTEC BOYSGIRLS-YOUTH PROGRAMS
    one grant, 2019 · $47k
  • PS
    PATH-EMERGENCY SHELTER
    one grant, 2019 · $38k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
2
Boys & Girls Club of the Gila Valley

We will provide a safe place for children to learn and grow into their full potential. we will teach them the dangers of drugs and enable them to make good choices for their lives.

Youth Development
3
Boys & Girls Club of Northern Utah

Provide programming and activites for at-risk youth during the after-school and non-school hours. progarms and activities include educational fitness, health, life skills, leadership, art programs, events, and activities

Youth Development
4
Boys and Girls Club of Sierra Vista Inc

To enable all young people to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. to serve youth in sierra vista by providing them a safe, friendly, healthy and structured environment where they can have fun, learn and…

Youth Development
5
Greater San Marcos Youth Council Inc

Youth at risk and emergency shelter

Human Services
6
Boys and Girls Club of Bisbee Arizona

To inspire, teach and enable the youth of bisbee, az and surrounding areas, esecially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to have fun while realizing their full potential as productive, healthy, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
7
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Arizona

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
8
Boys and Girls Club of Gallup

Promote healthy development alternatives for community youth.

Youth Development
9
Sierra County Child Abuse Council

Child abuse awareness and prevention

Crime & Legal
10
Boys & Girls Clubs of Chaves & Lincoln Counties

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens of good character.

Youth Development
11
Manuelito Navajo Childrens Home

To provide a home, education, and spiritual guidance for children who, for various reasons, cannot live with their parents.

Human Services
12
Boys & Girls Club of San Marcos

To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as responsible and caring citizens.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childhaven Inc; the most unlike its peers is San Juan United Way. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $708,704 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $135,854 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $111,320 · OtherFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INCAZTEC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $108,366 · OtherAZTEC BOYS & GIRLS CLUBBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMFIELD: $93,436 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS-DISASTER: $73,880 · Other+33 more: $715,458 · Other+33 moreCHILDHAVEN INC: $172,782 · Human ServicesCHILDHAVEN INCPEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS INC: $159,647 · Human ServicesPEOPLE ASSISTING THE …ECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC: $133,426 · Human ServicesECONOMIC COUNCIL HELP…DESERT VIEW INC: $65,527 · Human ServicesDESERT VIEW INC+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesBoys & Girls Club of San Juan County: $121,105 · Youth DevelopmentKIRTLAND YOUTH ASSOCIATION INC: $53,278 · Youth DevelopmentPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES: $126,515 · HealthNAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTER: $33,824 · HealthSAN JUAN UNITED WAY: $33,188 · Community Improvement
Other$1,947,018Human Services$541,382Youth Development$174,383Health$160,339Community Improvement$33,188

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDHAVEN INC: $172,782 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetPEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS INC: $159,647 over 3y, 14% of budgetECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC: $133,426 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES: $126,515 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of San Juan County: $121,105 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $111,320 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetAZTEC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $108,366 over 2y, 18% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMFIELD: $93,436 over 2y, 32% of budgetDESERT VIEW INC: $65,527 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetKIRTLAND YOUTH ASSOCIATION INC: $53,278 over 3y, 18% of budgetNAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTER: $33,824 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetSAN JUAN UNITED WAY: $33,188 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetGREAT SOUTHWEST-YUCCA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $22,688 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NEW MEXICO TRAILS INC: $15,754 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMASADA HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds ECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of San Juan County ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AZTEC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMFIELD ↗
  • Who funds DESERT VIEW INC ↗
  • Who funds KIRTLAND YOUTH ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAN JUAN UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds GREAT SOUTHWEST-YUCCA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NEW MEXICO TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds MASADA HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Merrion Family Founda…Westmeath FoundationGreater Houston Commu…Thomas a and Mary E D…Lineberry FoundationPierce Family Foundat…Pnm Tnmp FoundationThe Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Merrion Family FoundationDE32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Merrion Family Foundation · Westmeath Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Thomas a and Mary E Dugan Foundation · Lineberry Foundation · Pierce Family Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Juan United Way funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Juan United Way. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to San Juan United Way?

    Find your warmest path to San Juan United Way through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on San Juan United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home