Skip to content

· Private foundation

San Francisco Humanities Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$221k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$311kReligion$276kRecreation & Sports$151kPhilanthropy$106kFood & Nutrition$100kCrime & Legal$84kArts & Culture$52kHuman Services$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $133k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $88k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JCF ISRAEL PROGRAMMING FUND$15,000
SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL$15,000
OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL$12,000
BRANDEIS MARIN$12,000
THE BRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SF$12,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL$12,000
CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA$10,000
JCCSF OLDER ADULTS ENRICHMENT PROGR$9,000
SAN FRANCISCO-MARIN FOOD BANK$7,500
CONGREGATION ANSHEY SFARD$7,500
CONGREGATION ADATH ISRAEL$7,500
FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY$7,500
CONGREGATION SHA'AR ZAHAV$7,500
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$7,500
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CONTRA COSTA$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $8k → 7%BRANDEIS MARIN: $12k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $10k → 9%FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $8k → 10%JCC MACCABI SPORTS CAMP: $18k → 10%BRANDEIS MARIN: $12k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $10k → 9%JCC MACCABI SPORTS CAMP: $15k → 10%BRANDEIS MARIN: $12k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $10k → 9%JEWISH LEARNING WORKS: $10k → 10%BRANDEIS MARIN: $11k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $10k → 9%JCCSF OLDER ADULTS ENRICHMENT PROGR: $9k → 10%BRANDEIS MARIN: $10k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $9k → 9%JEWISH LEARNING WORKS: $8k → 10%CAMP RAMAH IN NOTHERN CALIFORNIA: $15k → 7%BRANDEIS MARIN: $8k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $9k → 9%JEWISH LEARNING WORKS: $8k → 10%CAMP RAMAH IN NOTHERN CALIFORNIA: $8k → 7%BRANDEIS MARIN: $8k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $9k → 9%CONGREGATION ANSHEY SFARD: $8k → 10%BRANDEIS MARIN: $8k → 8%MAGIN DAVID SEPHARDIM CONGREGATION: $8k → 10%BRANDIES MARIN: $8k → 8%CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA: $10k → 9%URJ CAMP NEWMAN: $20k → 8%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $15k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS OF CONTRA COSTA: $8k → 9%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $12k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL: $15k → 10%THE BRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SF: $12k → 10%THE BRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SF: $11k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL: $10k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL: $8k → 10%JCF ISRAEL PROGRAMMING FUND: $15k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $12k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $11k → 10%JCF ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 40 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
18

Total granted

$1.1M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+85%

Still filing today

38%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionReligionHealthRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    Oakland Hebrew Day School
    8× · 2018–2025 · $90k · revenue +57%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +143%
  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $74k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • JI
    JCF ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • CR
    CAMP RAMAH OF N CA
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Limmud Bay Area

Provide jewish education and cultural services to the jewish community of the s.f. bay area

Religion
2
Jewish Community Center of Sonoma County

To build and strengthen the Jewish community, to provide cultural, educational, social and recreational opportunities for a deeper commitment to, and greater participation in Jewish life in Sonoma County.

Arts & Culture
3
Youth Towns of Israel (California)
International
4
Contra Costa Midrasha

The mission of contra costa midrasha (ccm) is to form and inform a pluralistic jewish teen community (grades 8-12) and to develop and enhance personal jewish identity for each member of this community

—
5
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
6
California Jewish Legislative Caucus Leadership Foundation

To promote social welfare by providing a forum to discuss, educate the public, and advance programs that promote topical issues of interest to the jewish community in california. the foundation will promote an understanding of cultural,…

Civil Rights
7
Coastal Roots Farm

Coastal roots farm cultivates healthy, connected communities by integrating sustainable agriculture, food justice, and ancient jewish wisdom.

—
8
San Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc

(continued from page 1) nationally and internationally. Further, J seeks to enrich the cultural, religious and social life of the community through its articles, interviews and features.

Education
9
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Providing social and educational activities in order to create a community for Jewish students at Sonoma State University. Primary programs include celebrating Jewish holidays as a community, holding monthly Sabbath dinners (COVID…

—
10
Jewish Silicon Valley

The mission of jewish silicon valley is to harness the power of community to improve lives, build bridges of understanding and strengthen the jewish people here, in israel, and around the world.

Human Services
11
New Lehrhaus the Bay Area Hub for Adult Jewish Learning

Adult Jewish Learning

Education
12
The University of Iowa Louis Shulman Hillel Foundation

The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Learningworks; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels Contra Costa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRANDEIS MARIN: $81,000 · OtherBRANDEIS MARINSAN FRANCISCO HILLEL: $74,920 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO HILLELJCC MACCABI SPORTS CAMP: $60,000 · OtherJCC MACCABI SPORTS CAMPSHA AR ZAHAV: $29,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ANSHEY SFARD: $27,000 · OtherMAGAIN DAVID SEPHARDIM CONGREGATION: $26,500 · OtherURJ CAMP NEWMAN: $26,000 · OtherTHE BRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SF: $25,000 · OtherADATH ISRAEL: $25,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ADATH ISRAEL: $24,500 · Other+40 more: $284,100 · Other+40 moreOakland Hebrew Day School: $90,000 · EducationOakland Hebrew Day Sch…Jewish Commmunity High School of the Bay: $53,000 · EducationJewish Commmunity High…READING PARTNERS: $46,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERSFRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $43,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE JEWISH …CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $74,137 · Civil RightsJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS: $55,000 · ReligionTAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $6,000 · ReligionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $20,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $17,500 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $17,500 · Food & NutritionCAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $53,000 · Recreation & SportsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $13,500 · HealthNAMI Contra Costa: $1,000 · Health
Other$683,020Education$232,000Civil Rights$74,137Religion$61,000Food & Nutrition$55,000Recreation & Sports$53,000Health$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOakland Hebrew Day School: $90,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO HILLEL: $74,920 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $74,137 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS: $55,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Commmunity High School of the Bay: $53,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $53,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $46,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $43,000 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA: $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $17,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI Contra Costa: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oakland Hebrew Day School ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LEARNINGWORKS ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Commmunity High School of the Bay ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds TAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA26.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · Koret Foundation · Howard and Irene Levine Family Foundation · John Pritzker Family Fund · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Meyer Milton Char Tuw-Main · The Sheila Reicher Fine Foundation · Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund · The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc · Rmlow Foundation · New Israel Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Francisco Humanities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Francisco Humanities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to San Francisco Humanities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to San Francisco Humanities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on San Francisco Humanities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph