Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

San Francisco Humanities Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$221k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$311kReligion$276kRecreation & Sports$151kPhilanthropy$106kFood & Nutrition$100kCrime & Legal$84kArts & Culture$52kHuman Services$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $133k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $88k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL$15,000
JCF ISRAEL PROGRAMMING FUND$15,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL$12,000
THE BRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SF$12,000
OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL$12,000
BRANDEIS MARIN$12,000
CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA$10,000
JCCSF OLDER ADULTS ENRICHMENT PROGR$9,000
CONGREGATION ADATH ISRAEL$7,500
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$7,500
FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY$7,500
CONGREGATION ANSHEY SFARD$7,500
CONGREGATION SHA'AR ZAHAV$7,500
MAGIN DAVID SEPHARDIM CONGREGATION$7,500
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CONTRA COSTA$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $8k → 7%BRANDEIS MARIN: $12k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $10k → 9%FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $8k → 10%JCC MACCABI SPORTS CAMP: $18k → 10%BRANDEIS MARIN: $12k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $10k → 9%JCC MACCABI SPORTS CAMP: $15k → 10%BRANDEIS MARIN: $12k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $10k → 9%JEWISH LEARNING WORKS: $10k → 10%BRANDEIS MARIN: $11k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $10k → 9%JCCSF OLDER ADULTS ENRICHMENT PROGR: $9k → 10%BRANDEIS MARIN: $10k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $9k → 9%JEWISH LEARNING WORKS: $8k → 10%CAMP RAMAH IN NOTHERN CALIFORNIA: $15k → 7%BRANDEIS MARIN: $8k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $9k → 9%JEWISH LEARNING WORKS: $8k → 10%CAMP RAMAH IN NOTHERN CALIFORNIA: $8k → 7%BRANDIES MARIN: $8k → 8%CASA OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $9k → 9%MAGIN DAVID SEPHARDIM CONGREGATION: $8k → 10%BRANDEIS MARIN: $8k → 8%CONGREGATION ANSHEY SFARD: $8k → 10%BRANDEIS MARIN: $8k → 8%CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA: $10k → 9%URJ CAMP NEWMAN: $20k → 8%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $15k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS OF CONTRA COSTA: $8k → 9%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $12k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL: $15k → 10%THE BRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SF: $12k → 10%THE BRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SF: $11k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL: $10k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL: $8k → 10%JCF ISRAEL PROGRAMMING FUND: $15k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $12k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $11k → 10%JCF ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 40 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
18

Total granted

$1.1M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+85%

Still filing today

38%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionReligionHealthRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    Oakland Hebrew Day School
    8× · 2018–2025 · $90k · revenue +57%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +143%
  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $74k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • JI
    JCF ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • CR
    CAMP RAMAH OF N CA
    one grant, 2021 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Limmud Bay Area

Provide jewish education and cultural services to the jewish community of the s.f. bay area

Religion
2
Jewish Community Center of Sonoma County

To build and strengthen the Jewish community, to provide cultural, educational, social and recreational opportunities for a deeper commitment to, and greater participation in Jewish life in Sonoma County.

Arts & Culture
3
Youth Towns of Israel (California)
International
4
Contra Costa Midrasha

The mission of contra costa midrasha (ccm) is to form and inform a pluralistic jewish teen community (grades 8-12) and to develop and enhance personal jewish identity for each member of this community

5
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
6
California Jewish Legislative Caucus Leadership Foundation

To promote social welfare by providing a forum to discuss, educate the public, and advance programs that promote topical issues of interest to the jewish community in california. the foundation will promote an understanding of cultural,…

Civil Rights
7
Coastal Roots Farm

Coastal roots farm cultivates healthy, connected communities by integrating sustainable agriculture, food justice, and ancient jewish wisdom.

8
San Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc

(continued from page 1) nationally and internationally. Further, J seeks to enrich the cultural, religious and social life of the community through its articles, interviews and features.

Education
9
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Providing social and educational activities in order to create a community for Jewish students at Sonoma State University. Primary programs include celebrating Jewish holidays as a community, holding monthly Sabbath dinners (COVID…

10
Jewish Silicon Valley

The mission of jewish silicon valley is to harness the power of community to improve lives, build bridges of understanding and strengthen the jewish people here, in israel, and around the world.

Human Services
11
New Lehrhaus the Bay Area Hub for Adult Jewish Learning

Adult Jewish Learning

Education
12
The University of Iowa Louis Shulman Hillel Foundation

The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Learningworks and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels Contra Costa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr18%39%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr13%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr18%38%20–35yr13%44%35–55yr13%10%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
12%
3,231/26,567

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BRANDEIS MARIN — $81,000 · OtherBRANDEIS MARINSAN FRANCISCO HILLEL — $74,920 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO HILLELJCC MACCABI SPORTS CAMP — $60,000 · OtherJCC MACCABI SPORTS CAMPSHA AR ZAHAV — $29,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ANSHEY SFARD — $27,000 · OtherMAGAIN DAVID SEPHARDIM CONGREGATION — $26,500 · OtherURJ CAMP NEWMAN — $26,000 · OtherTHE BRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SF — $25,000 · OtherADATH ISRAEL — $25,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ADATH ISRAEL — $24,500 · Other+40 more — $284,100 · Other+40 moreOakland Hebrew Day School — $90,000 · EducationOakland Hebrew Day Sch…Jewish Commmunity High School of the Bay — $53,000 · EducationJewish Commmunity High…READING PARTNERS — $46,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERSFRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIBRARY — $43,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE JEWISH …CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY — $74,137 · Civil RightsJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS — $55,000 · ReligionTAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $6,000 · ReligionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $20,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC — $17,500 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $17,500 · Food & NutritionCAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $53,000 · Recreation & SportsAmerican Heart Association Inc — $13,500 · HealthNAMI Contra Costa — $1,000 · Health
Other$683,020Education$232,000Civil Rights$74,137Religion$61,000Food & Nutrition$55,000Recreation & Sports$53,000Health$14,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOakland Hebrew Day School — $90,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO HILLEL — $74,920 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY — $74,137 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS — $55,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $53,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetJewish Commmunity High School of the Bay — $53,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $46,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIBRARY — $43,000 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC — $17,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI Contra Costa — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oakland Hebrew Day School
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO HILLEL
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
  • Who funds JEWISH LEARNINGWORKS
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds Jewish Commmunity High School of the Bay
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIBRARY
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA26.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · Koret Foundation · Howard and Irene Levine Family Foundation · John Pritzker Family Fund · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Meyer Milton Char Tuw-Main · The Sheila Reicher Fine Foundation · Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund · The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc · Rmlow Foundation · New Israel Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization San Francisco Humanities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to San Francisco Humanities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to San Francisco Humanities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph