Skip to content
San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium

To develop and implement programs and to support policies that increase access to community based primary care for the uninsured and underserved patients in the city and county of san francisco.

$8.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$79MHuman Services$1.0MPublic Benefit$46kCivil Rights$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $780k
  • $250k+7 grants · $7.9M
$224,738
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTHRIGHT 360$3,014,556
SF DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH$1,612,446
SOUTH OF MARKET HEALTH CENTER$1,204,171
MISSION NEIGHBORHOOD HLTH CTR$1,082,545
NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES$379,288
CURRY SENIOR CENTER$325,640
SF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$252,973
SAINT ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER$224,738
RECAST HEALTH$156,009
PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTHERN$124,000
SAN FRAN FREE CLINIC$117,615
NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER$94,099
MARIN CITY HEALTH & WELLNESS$63,930
OCHININC$34,315
CDW$27,757
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $359k → 10%CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $326k → 10%Curry Senior Center: $285k → 10%Curry Senior Center: $40k → 10%Curry Senior Center: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70M · 18 repeat orgs$9.7M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$70M
$9.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+66%

Still filing today

72%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $274k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HEALTHRIGHT 360
    8× · 2017–2025 · $27M · revenue +73%
  • MISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $9.3M · revenue +60%
  • EH
    EQUITY HEALTH
    8× · 2017–2025 · $8.5M · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • RO
    Regents of the University of Califo
    one grant, 2020 · $8.3M
  • SF
    San Francisco Health Plan
    one grant, 2020 · $989k
  • HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $106k · revenue +89%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
2
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
3
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
4
Gardner Family Health Network Inc

Gardner Health Services (GHS) is dedicated to providing high quality, comprehensive medical and mental healthcare, including prevention and education, early intervention, treatment and advocacy services which are affordable, respectful,…

Health
5
Primary Care at Home Inc

We provide healthcare and health management services in the Oakland, California Bay Area. We seek to recognize, empathize, and correctly respond to clients individual needs both medically and psychosocially. Everyone in our care is treated…

Health
6
San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium

To develop and implement programs and to support policies that increase access to community based primary care for the uninsured and underserved patients in the city and county of san francisco.

—
7
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
8
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center Inc

Provide comprehensive community health services to southern Alameda County.

Health
10
Harbor Community Clinic Inc

To provide quality, comprehensive, healthcare and supportive services to those in our community, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
11
Mendocino Community Health Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare for everyone in our communities.

Health
12
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Area Health Associates; the most unlike its peers is Healthright 360. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTHRIGHT 360: $26,891,805 · OtherHEALTHRIGHT 360EQUITY HEALTH: $8,546,387 · OtherEQUITY HEALTHRegents of the University of Califo: $8,268,692 · OtherRegents of the University of CalifoCITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $7,260,824 · OtherCITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCOSF DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $4,221,042 · OtherSF DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTHST ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $2,420,290 · Other+11 more: $2,394,163 · OtherMISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATES: $9,262,264 · HealthMISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCI…NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES: $3,738,414 · HealthNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICE…OCHIN INC: $3,521,996 · HealthOCHIN INCAsian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc: $1,182,872 · HealthAsian and Pacific Islander…+4 more: $872,823 · HealthCURRY SENIOR CENTER: $1,015,474 · Human ServicesGLIDE FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Religion
Other$60,003,203Health$18,578,369Human Services$1,015,474Religion$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTHRIGHT 360: $26,891,805 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetMISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATES: $9,262,264 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetEQUITY HEALTH: $8,546,387 over 8y, 13% of budgetNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES: $3,738,414 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetOCHIN INC: $3,521,996 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetAsian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc: $1,182,872 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetCURRY SENIOR CENTER: $1,015,474 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $567,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNative American Health Center Inc: $441,964 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMARIN CITY HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER: $223,590 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBAART COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE: $118,600 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $105,934 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA COVERAGE & HEALTH INITIATIVES: $62,897 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGLIDE FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLYON-MARTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $18,736 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FREE CLINIC: $13,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTHRIGHT 360 ↗
  • Who funds MISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds EQUITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds OCHIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CURRY SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Native American Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARIN CITY HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BAART COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COVERAGE & HEALTH INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LYON-MARTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FREE CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Physicians…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The San Francisco Fou…Direct ReliefSutter Bay HospitalsCalifornia Healthcare…The California Wellne…Tides FoundationMedshare Internationa…McNabb FoundationMarin Community Found…Silicon Valley Commun…
California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California FdnCA28× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The San Francisco Foundation · Direct Relief · Sutter Bay Hospitals · California Healthcare Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Tides Foundation · Medshare International Inc · McNabb Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Ochin Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home