· Public charity
San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium
To develop and implement programs and to support policies that increase access to community based primary care for the uninsured and underserved patients in the city and county of san francisco.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $84k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $780k
- $250k+7 grants · $7.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEALTHRIGHT 360 | $3,014,556 |
| SF DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH | $1,612,446 |
| SOUTH OF MARKET HEALTH CENTER | $1,204,171 |
| MISSION NEIGHBORHOOD HLTH CTR | $1,082,545 |
| NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES | $379,288 |
| CURRY SENIOR CENTER | $325,640 |
| SF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $252,973 |
| SAINT ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER | $224,738 |
| RECAST HEALTH | $156,009 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTHERN | $124,000 |
| SAN FRAN FREE CLINIC | $117,615 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER | $94,099 |
| MARIN CITY HEALTH & WELLNESS | $63,930 |
| OCHININC | $34,315 |
| CDW | $27,757 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $274k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
HEALTHRIGHT 3608× · 2017–2025 · $27M · revenue +73%
MISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATES8× · 2017–2025 · $9.3M · revenue +60%- EHEQUITY HEALTH8× · 2017–2025 · $8.5M · revenue +63%
Funded once
- RORegents of the University of Califoone grant, 2020 · $8.3M
- SFSan Francisco Health Planone grant, 2020 · $989k
HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $106k · revenue +89%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.
Gardner Health Services (GHS) is dedicated to providing high quality, comprehensive medical and mental healthcare, including prevention and education, early intervention, treatment and advocacy services which are affordable, respectful,…
We provide healthcare and health management services in the Oakland, California Bay Area. We seek to recognize, empathize, and correctly respond to clients individual needs both medically and psychosocially. Everyone in our care is treated…
To develop and implement programs and to support policies that increase access to community based primary care for the uninsured and underserved patients in the city and county of san francisco.
Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
Provide comprehensive community health services to southern Alameda County.
To provide quality, comprehensive, healthcare and supportive services to those in our community, regardless of their ability to pay.
To provide the highest quality healthcare for everyone in our communities.
Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Area Health Associates and the most unlike its peers is Healthright 360. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEALTHRIGHT 360 ↗
- Who funds MISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATES ↗
- Who funds EQUITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds OCHIN INC ↗
- Who funds Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CURRY SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Native American Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds MARIN CITY HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER ↗
- Who funds BAART COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COVERAGE & HEALTH INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LYON-MARTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FREE CLINIC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The San Francisco Foundation · Direct Relief · Sutter Bay Hospitals · California Healthcare Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Tides Foundation · Medshare International Inc · McNabb Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ochin Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.