Skip to content

· Public charity

San Diego Hunger Coalition

SAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITION works collaboratively with community partners to create equitable access to food assistance through research, education, and advocacy.

$545k
Granted FY2020
32
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2020 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 32 grants below total $487,687, the rows itemized in this filing. The $545,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $57,313 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k15 grants · $111k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $232k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $145k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$847k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN YSIDRO HEALTH CENTER$145,000
SAN DIEGO UNF FOOD & NUTR SVC$20,000
MOUNTAIN EMPIRE UNF SCH DIST$20,000
ESCONDIDO UNION HS NUTR SVCS$20,000
SOUTHERN INDIAN HEALTH COUNCI$20,000
CAJON VALLEY UNION NUTR SVCS$17,500
VISTA UNIFIED NUTRITION SVCS$15,000
GROSSMONT UNION HS NUTR SVCS$15,000
SWEETWATER UNION NUTR SVCS$15,000
SAN MARCOS UNF SCH NUTR SVCS$12,500
LA MESA-SPRING VAL NUTR SVC$12,500
OCEANSIDE UNIFIED SCH DIST$12,187
VISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC$11,500
UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMM$10,500
HOME START$10,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMM: $11k → 11%SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOUNTAIN EMPIRE UNF SCH DIST: $20,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN EMPIRE UNF SCH DISTESCONDIDO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20,000 · OtherESCONDIDO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICTSAN DIEGO UNF FOOD & NUTR SVC: $20,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO UNF FOOD & NUTR SVCCAJON VALLEY UNION NUTR SVCS: $17,500 · OtherCAJON VALLEY UNION NUTR SVCSVISTA UNIFIED NUTRITION SVCS: $15,000 · OtherGROSSMONT UNION HS NUTR SVCS: $15,000 · OtherSWEETWATER UNION NUTR SVCS: $15,000 · OtherLA MESA-SPRING VAL NUTR SVC: $12,500 · OtherSAN MARCOS UNF SCH NUTR SVCS: $12,500 · OtherOCEANSIDE UNIFIED SCH DIST: $12,187 · OtherPOWAY UNIFIED SCH NUTR SVCS: $10,000 · OtherBORREGO COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+14 more: $103,500 · Other+14 moreCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC: $145,000 · HealthCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YS…Southern Indian Health Council: $20,000 · HealthSouthern Indian Health CouncilVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $11,500 · HealthVISTA COMMUNITY CLINICUNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES: $10,500 · Human ServicesSOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $7,500 · Human ServicesHOME START INC: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$283,187Health$176,500Human Services$18,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC: $145,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Indian Health Council: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $11,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES: $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOME START INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBORREGO COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Indian Health Council ↗
  • Who funds VISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds HOME START INC ↗
  • Who funds BORREGO COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Health Center Partners of Southern California · United Way of San Diego County · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · The Parker Foundation · Leichtag Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Direct Relief

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Diego Hunger Coalition funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Diego Hunger Coalition. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on San Diego Hunger Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph