Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

San Diego Hunger Coalition

SAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITION works collaboratively with community partners to create equitable access to food assistance through research, education, and advocacy.

$545k
Granted FY2020
32
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 32 grants below total $487,687 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $545,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $57,313 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k15 grants · $111k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $232k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $145k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$847k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN YSIDRO HEALTH CENTER$145,000
MOUNTAIN EMPIRE UNF SCH DIST$20,000
SAN DIEGO UNF FOOD & NUTR SVC$20,000
SOUTHERN INDIAN HEALTH COUNCI$20,000
ESCONDIDO UNION HS NUTR SVCS$20,000
CAJON VALLEY UNION NUTR SVCS$17,500
VISTA UNIFIED NUTRITION SVCS$15,000
GROSSMONT UNION HS NUTR SVCS$15,000
SWEETWATER UNION NUTR SVCS$15,000
LA MESA-SPRING VAL NUTR SVC$12,500
SAN MARCOS UNF SCH NUTR SVCS$12,500
OCEANSIDE UNIFIED SCH DIST$12,187
VISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC$11,500
UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMM$10,500
HOME START$10,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMM: $11k → 11%SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MOUNTAIN EMPIRE UNF SCH DIST — $20,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN EMPIRE UNF SCH DISTESCONDIDO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT — $20,000 · OtherESCONDIDO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICTSAN DIEGO UNF FOOD & NUTR SVC — $20,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO UNF FOOD & NUTR SVCCAJON VALLEY UNION NUTR SVCS — $17,500 · OtherCAJON VALLEY UNION NUTR SVCSGROSSMONT UNION HS NUTR SVCS — $15,000 · OtherSWEETWATER UNION NUTR SVCS — $15,000 · OtherVISTA UNIFIED NUTRITION SVCS — $15,000 · OtherSAN MARCOS UNF SCH NUTR SVCS — $12,500 · OtherLA MESA-SPRING VAL NUTR SVC — $12,500 · OtherOCEANSIDE UNIFIED SCH DIST — $12,187 · OtherPOWAY UNIFIED SCH NUTR SVCS — $10,000 · OtherBORREGO COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Other+14 more — $103,500 · Other+14 moreCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC — $145,000 · HealthCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YS…Southern Indian Health Council — $20,000 · HealthSouthern Indian Health CouncilVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC — $11,500 · HealthVISTA COMMUNITY CLINICUNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES — $10,500 · Human ServicesSOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO — $7,500 · Human ServicesHOME START INC — $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$283,187Health$176,500Human Services$18,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC — $145,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Indian Health Council — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC — $11,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES — $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOME START INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBORREGO COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO — $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC
  • Who funds Southern Indian Health Council
  • Who funds VISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC
  • Who funds UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES
  • Who funds HOME START INC
  • Who funds BORREGO COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Health Center Partners of Southern California · United Way of San Diego County · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · The Parker Foundation · Leichtag Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Direct Relief

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization San Diego Hunger Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph