Skip to content
San Angelo Health Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

San Angelo Health Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$404k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$8.9MHousing & Shelter$1.9MPhilanthropy$1.8MYouth Development$1.3MArts & Culture$1.3MCrime & Legal$1.2MHuman Services$1.1MEducation$970kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $419k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+2 grants · $654k
$35,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION$403,549
LA ESPERANZA CLINIC$250,000
SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER$222,236
INSTITUTE FOR COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT INC (ICD)$150,000
PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY$125,000
SAN ANGELO DIABETES COALITION$125,000
SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION$100,000
MHMR SERVICES FOR THE CONCHO VALLEY$100,000
SCHLEICHER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY$100,000
WEST TEXAS COUNSELING & GUIDANCE$92,240
JUNCTION COMMUNITY AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM & FAMILY CENTER$75,000
YMCA OF SAN ANGELO$75,000
CONCHO VALLEY HOME FOR GIRLS$55,000
CONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT$50,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LAKE IVIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $85k → 20%JOSEPH THOMAS FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%LAKE IVIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $55k → 20%LAKE IVIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $22k → 20%STERLING COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $25k → 12%LAKE IVIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $21k → 20%JOSEPH THOMAS FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY: $125k → 13%KEEPERS OF HOPE: $25k → 13%LA ESPERANZA CLINIC: $250k → 13%LA ESPERANZA CLINIC: $250k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $222k → 13%SAN ANGELO LIONS CHARITIES: $76k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $3k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $2k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 51 repeat orgs$5.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
67

Total granted

$15M
$4.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-12%

Still filing today

57%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $537k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +203%
  • TW
    The West Texas Rehabilitation Center
    3× · 2020–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +34%
  • WT
    WEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH
    5× · 2017–2022 · $733k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • FC
    FORT CONCHO NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK AND CITY OF SAN ANGELO
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
  • CV
    Concho Valley Regional Food Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $300k · revenue +40% · 29% of their budget
  • BM
    BALLINGER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
2
South Brazos County Fire Department

Volunteer Fire Department, providing fire, rescue, and medical services to a population of approximately 22,000 residents, 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Sand Hills Volunteer Fire Department Inc

To provide fire protection, education, emergency medical treatment and rescue services to approx 140 sq miles in guadalupe county texas.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
5
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
6
Healthy Families San Angelo

To enhance the ability of families to protect, nuture, and educate their children in the first five years of life and enable them to enter school ready to learn.

—
7
Fredericksburg Community Health Center

The mission of the Good Samaritan Center is to provide a safe, Christ- Centered environment that gives our patients quality, coordinated and affordable healthcare.

Health
8
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
9
Eastland County Crisis Center Inc

To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.

Human Services
10
San Antonio Christian Dental Clinic

Sa christian dental clinic's mission is to extend christ's healing by providing charitable dental care to underserved bexar county adults. the vision of the clinic is a commitment to creating a community in which dental care and optimal…

—
11
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
12
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Concho Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Playland Communities Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/64
Grantees still filing
35/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL: $1,382,000 · OtherALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCILYMCA OF SAN ANGELO: $856,200 · OtherYMCA OF SAN ANGELOCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF TGC: $828,730 · OtherCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF TGCWEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH: $733,027 · OtherWEST TEXAS BOYS RANCHSAN ANGELO DIABETES COALITION: $573,984 · OtherHOWARD COLLEGE: $522,810 · OtherFORT CONCHO NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK AND CITY OF SAN ANGELO: $500,000 · OtherANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY: $419,653 · Other+88 more: $6,691,049 · Other+88 moreWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE: $1,929,863 · HealthWEST TEXAS COUNSELING …The West Texas Rehabilitation Center: $1,600,000 · HealthThe West Texas Rehabil…CONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT: $425,518 · HealthCONCHO VALLEY CENTER F…+6 more: $256,680 · Health+6 moreSAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $1,541,481 · PhilanthropySAN ANGEL…BALLINGER CARES INC: $115,000 · PhilanthropyBALLINGER…UNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC: $93,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $38,580 · PhilanthropyLA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $500,000 · Human ServicesSAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $228,236 · Human ServicesLAKE IVIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $183,432 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesSAN ANGELO LIONS CHARITIES INC: $76,000 · Human Services+3 more: $70,000 · Human ServicesSan Angelo Museum of Fine Arts: $534,740 · Arts & CultureSAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION INC: $138,000 · Arts & CultureRockport-Fulton Chamber Foundation: $100,000 · Arts & CultureDOWNTOWN SAN ANGELO INC: $40,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $38,121 · Arts & CultureGALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $675,000 · Housing & ShelterTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $95,000 · Housing & ShelterRUSTED AND WEATHERED INC: $40,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $7,130 · Housing & ShelterCHRISTOVAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $200,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWall Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $85,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$12,507,453Health$4,212,061Philanthropy$1,788,061Human Services$1,182,668Arts & Culture$850,861Housing & Shelter$817,130Public Safety & Disaster$285,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE: $1,929,863 over 7y, 11% of budgetThe West Texas Rehabilitation Center: $1,600,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetSAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $1,541,481 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetWEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH: $733,027 over 5y, 15% of budgetGALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $675,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetSAN ANGELO DIABETES COALITION: $573,984 over 6y, 98% of budgetSan Angelo Museum of Fine Arts: $534,740 over 2y, 23% of budgetLA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $500,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT: $425,518 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetINSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT INC: $301,176 over 4y, 10% of budgetConcho Valley Regional Food Bank: $300,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetSAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $228,236 over 4y, 22% of budgetCHRISTOVAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $200,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $198,856 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetLAKE IVIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $183,432 over 3y, 65% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS: $150,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION INC: $138,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $132,500 over 4y, 14% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC: $125,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY HOME FOR GIRLS INC: $120,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetBALLINGER CARES INC: $115,000 over 1y, 65% of budgetJunction Community After School Program & Family Center: $103,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT: $100,159 over 3y, 16% of budgetPLAYLAND COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 80% of budgetRockport-Fulton Chamber Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetHumane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS: $100,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetSCHLEICHER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTEXAS DENTAL ASSOCIATION SMILES FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $95,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC: $93,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetWall Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $85,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetTHE WHIT PROGRAM INC: $83,502 over 3y, 26% of budgetSAN ANGELO LIONS CHARITIES INC: $76,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetSCHLEICHER COUNTY WELLNESS: $75,723 over 1y, 65% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGCY: $70,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $57,663 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRUSTED AND WEATHERED INC: $40,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetDOWNTOWN SAN ANGELO INC: $40,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSUTTON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $35,621 over 1y, 26% of budgetPHILANTHROPY SOUTHWEST: $31,900 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetLEUKEMIATEXAS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMEALS FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC: $26,648 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSTERLING COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CTR: $25,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN ANGELO INC: $24,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER: $24,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetRUST STREET MINISTRIES: $23,920 over 2y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
  • Who funds The West Texas Rehabilitation Center ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds GALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO DIABETES COALITION ↗
  • Who funds San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts ↗
  • Who funds LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Concho Valley Regional Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTOVAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds LAKE IVIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCHO VALLEY HOME FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLINGER CARES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Angelo Area Found…Art and Eva Camunez T…Mary Ellen Kent Bunya…Kickapoo Springs Foun…American Electric Pow…F V Hall & Marylou Ha…James B and Lois R Ar…Stribling Funding Cor…United Way of the Con…Methodist Healthcare …The Moody FoundationWayne & Jo Ann Moore …
San Angelo Area FoundationTX84.4× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Angelo Area Foundation · Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation · Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund · James B and Lois R Archer Charitable Foundation · Stribling Funding Corporation · United Way of the Concho Valley Inc · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Angelo Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Angelo Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 130 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on San Angelo Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home