· Public charity
San Angelo Chapter of Safari Club International
The organization's mission is to encourage, promote, and educate the general public and its members about wildlife conservation and management.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $123,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $402,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $279,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCI ALASKA CHAPTER | $25,000 |
| ASU FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| HOPE INSTITUTE | $20,000 |
| KIDS OUTDOOR ZONE INC | $12,500 |
| WEST TEXAS REHABILITATION CENTER | $12,500 |
| TOM GREEN COUNTY 4H RIFLE CLUB | $10,000 |
| TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| OPERATION PAY IT FORWARD | $7,500 |
| BLLOD ORIGINS INC | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ASANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC7× · 2018–2025 · $88k · revenue +58%
PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS3× · 2021–2025 · $29k · revenue +89%- TWThe West Texas Rehabilitation Center4× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- TPTexas Parks & Wildlife Departmentone grant, 2019 · $18k
- WHWILD HARVEST INITIATVIEone grant, 2023 · $10k
- RBRIVERWOOD BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Education and Wildlife Conservation
To protect the rights of hunters and the hunting heritage through advocacy, policy, and legislation.
Arizona Wildlife Federation's purpose is to promote and encourage the conservation, propagation, development and management of fish, game and other wildlife; to promote and encourage the wise use, conservation and restoration of waters,…
Our mission is to protect our state's hunting heritage and ensure this sports future for generations to come.
Preserving the sport of hunting through education, conservation, and the promotion of our hunting heritage.
The mission of the organization is to educate the public and outdoorsmen about wildlife and wildlife conservation and to raise funds for conservation grants.
Iwt is committed to combatting both the causes and effects of illegal wildlife trafficking by focusing on transnational organized crime groups who have escaped the consequences of their criminal activities to date.
Mzuri wildlife foundation is dedicated to promoting wildlife conservation and educating and encouraging the next generation of outdoor sports enthusiasts with an emphasis on women and youth.
Fish and wildlife conservation and outreach including public awareness. Fifteen public relations campaign on social media with over 7.5 million impressions. Twenty plus speaking engagements to a variety of conservation organizations…
Advance wildlife management and conservation through applied research and education activities.
To Promote Conservation and Wilderness Training by providing Outdoors Activities
Wildlife Management & Enhancement
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parks and Wildlife Foundation of Texas and the most unlike its peers is Safari Club International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TX WILDLIFE ↗
- Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds The West Texas Rehabilitation Center ↗
- Who funds Bobwhite Brigade ↗
- Who funds ALASKA KENAI PEN CHPTR SAFARI CLUB INTL ↗
- Who funds THE KIDS OUTDOORS ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds TRINITY OAKS ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION PAY IT FORWARD ↗
- Who funds THE ORIGINS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Safari Club International ↗
- Who funds NRA FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Safari Club International West Texas Chapter Inc · Weatherby Foundation International Inc · Dsc Foundation Inc · NRA Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization San Angelo Chapter of Safari Club International funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to San Angelo Chapter of Safari Club International?
Find your warmest path to San Angelo Chapter of Safari Club International through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.