Skip to content

· Private foundation

Salmen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$154k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$590kYouth Development$275kHuman Services$268kEducation$158kFood & Nutrition$124kReligion$77kHousing & Shelter$69kRecreation & Sports$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $125k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF NEW ORLEANS$30,000
STARC$15,000
CLEAR ANSWERS TO LA MENTAL HEALTH CALM$15,000
THE GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRY$15,000
ST MICHAEL SPECIAL SCHOOL$10,000
GULF COAST CANCER RELIEF PORKCHOPITOULAS$10,000
COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN$10,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$10,000
SISTERS SERVANTS OF MARY$10,000
BRIDGE HOUSE GRACE HOUSE$5,000
HEARTGIFT FOUNDATION$5,000
FRIENDS OF CAMP SALMEN NATURE PARK$5,000
PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF SLIDELL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
HOSPICE HOUSE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $208k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%KINGSLEY HOUSE: $5k → 23%KINGSLEY HOUSE: $5k → 23%KINGSLEY HOUSE: $2k → 23%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $10k → 11%KINGSLEY HOUSE: $2k → 23%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $10k → 11%RAINTREE CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 23%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $10k → 11%RAINTREE CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 23%RAINTREE CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 23%FAMILY PROMISE OF ST TAMMANY: $5k → 11%RAINTREE CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 23%RAINTREE CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 23%RAINTREE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 23%FAMILY PROMISE OF ST TAMMANY: $2k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF ST TAMMANY: $2k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF ST TAMMANY: $2k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF ST TAMMANY: $2k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF ST TAMMANY: $2k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 23%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 23%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 23%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 23%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 23%HARRY TOMPSON CENTER: $2k → 23%HARRY THOMPSON CENTER: $2k → 23%HARRY THOMPSON CENTER: $2k → 23%HARRY THOMPSON CENTER: $2k → 23%HARRY TOMPSON CENTER: $2k → 23%HARRY TOMPSON CENTER: $2k → 23%HARRY TOMPSON CENTER: $2k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 40 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
9

Total granted

$1.7M
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-13%

Still filing today

43%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    STARC OF LOUISIANA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $205k · revenue +26%
  • HI
    HOPE IGNITES NEW ORLEANS
    6× · 2018–2023 · $180k · revenue +27%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • OW
    One Way Love Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -28%
  • OW
    ONE WAY LOVE OF ST TAMMANY
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana Organization for Refugees and Immigrants
International
2
Renewal Center of Northeast Louisiana Inc

To provide for the material and spiritual needs of the homeless, hungry, and displaced of Northeast Louisiana, and to facilitate and assist them in getting out of the cycle of poverty.

Housing & Shelter
3
Responsibility House Inc

Supportive housing and substance use disorder treatment prorgrams serve the community by providing support and counseling to families and individuals who struggle with substance use disorders, homelessness, mental illness and/or hiv/aids.

Health
4
Louisiana Baptist Childrens Home and Family Ministries

To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.

—
5
Orleans County Child Advocacy Center Inc
Health
6
Center for Family and Youth Services

Agency delivers outpatient mental health counseling to at risk youth and families in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana.

Human Services
7
New Orleans Women & Children's Shelter Inc

Homeless shelter for women and children and families transitioning through training from homelessness and poverty to stability and self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
8
Capital Area Alliance for the Homeless

The Capital Area Alliance for the Homeless (CAAH) holds the fundamental belief that everyone, no matter how deprived in circumstances of housing and necessities is valued, entitled to dignity and respect, and deserving of community…

Community Improvement
9
The Bridge Center for Hope

The mission of the Bridge Center is to provide pathways to treatment for people experiencing behavioral health issues and to link providers to create an integrated continuum of care from prevention to rehabilitation.

Health
10
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Orleans Inc

Neighborhood housing services of new orleans, inc. revitalizes communities by increasing the number of homeowners and transforming vacant or substandard properties into sustainable homeownership. we improve quality of life through informed…

—
11
Acadiana Outreach Center Inc

Acadiana outreach center, inc. provides shelter and support to help the poor and homeless rebuild their lives.

Religion
12
Together Louisiana

Together Louisiana is a network of faith and community institutions that works to strengthen local leadership and support practical solutions to everyday challenges. Its mission focuses on helping communities work together across race…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridge House Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Crisis Pregnancy Help Center of Sli. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STARC OF LOUISIANA INC: $205,000 · OtherSTARC OF LOUISIANA INCNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $182,000 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESSHOPE IGNITES NEW ORLEANS: $180,000 · OtherHOPE IGNITES NEW ORLEANSST MICHAEL SPECIAL SCHOOL: $90,000 · OtherST MICHAEL SPECIAL SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $64,000 · OtherBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF NEW ORLEANS: $60,000 · OtherSISTERS SERVANTS OF MARY MINISTERS TO THE SICK: $55,000 · OtherSALMEN HIGH SCHOOL: $54,000 · Other+27 more: $371,000 · Other+27 moreCOMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CHR…RAINTREE SERVICES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesRAINTREE SERV…COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $25,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUS…Family Reach Alliance: $15,000 · Human ServicesFamily Reach …THE HARRY TOMPSON CENTER INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesTHE HARRY TOM…CLOVER NOLA INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesCLOVER NOLA I…SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $120,000 · Food & NutritionCRISIS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF SLI: $33,000 · HealthBRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION: $30,000 · HealthWHOLE VILLAGE ART THERAPY INC: $20,500 · HealthHEARTGIFT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $3,000 · HealthOZANAM INN: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterOne Way Love Inc: $10,000 · ReligionGOOD SHEPHERD NATIVITY MISSION SCHOOL INC: $7,000 · EducationGREATER NEW ORLEANS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,261,000Human Services$208,000Food & Nutrition$120,000Health$96,500Housing & Shelter$40,000Religion$10,000Education$7,000Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTARC OF LOUISIANA INC: $205,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE IGNITES NEW ORLEANS: $180,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $120,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN INC: $90,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetRAINTREE SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOZANAM INN: $40,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCRISIS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF SLI: $33,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetBRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ORLEANS MISSION INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWHOLE VILLAGE ART THERAPY INC: $20,500 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetFamily Reach Alliance: $15,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetTHE HARRY TOMPSON CENTER INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCLOVER NOLA INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTGIFT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOne Way Love Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD NATIVITY MISSION SCHOOL INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND IN NEW ORLEANS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER NEW ORLEANS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STARC OF LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINTREE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds OZANAM INN ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF SLI ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds NEW ORLEANS MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds WHOLE VILLAGE ART THERAPY INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Reach Alliance ↗
  • Who funds THE HARRY TOMPSON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CLOVER NOLA INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTGIFT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds One Way Love Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD NATIVITY MISSION SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA37.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · Shell USA Company Foundation · J Edgar Monroe Foundation · Forekids Foundations Inc Dba Zurich Classic of New Orleans · Gayle and Tom Benson Charitable Foundation · The Vincent Saia Foundation · Lauricella Land Company Foundation · Angel Wings Foundation · Ronnie & Gwen Briggs Foundation · Luther and Zita Templeman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Salmen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Salmen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Salmen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Salmen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Salmen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph