Skip to content
Sakhuja Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Sakhuja Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$15kReligion$15kPhilanthropy$4kFood & Nutrition$1kHuman Services$1kHealth$252International$250
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$488k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION$5,684
MAA DURGA SRI SAI BABA TEMPLE$5,136
BROWN GIRLS ON A MISSION INC$1,500
SENIORS FIRST INC$1,000
ONE HEART FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC$196
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$102
NORA SANDIGO CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORA SANDIGO CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $100 → 15%ONE HEART FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC: $250 → 13%SENIORS FIRST INC: $1k → 13%ONE HEART FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC: $196 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 69% of Sakhuja Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 51%.

Sakhuja Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31k · 4 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +353% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$31k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+353%
+16%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MD
    MAA DURGA SRI SAI BABA TEMPLE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +980%
  • OU
    ORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $14k · revenue +92%
  • JF
    JOURNEY FOR GOOD FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +353%

Funded once

  • AM
    ADAM MICHAEL ROSEN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -75%
  • FC
    Feeding Children Everywhere Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • LH
    LENDING HAND GLOBAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orlando Health Inc

Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
2
Orlando Health Foundation Inc

The mission of the orlando health foundation is to support the strategic priorities of orlando health through philanthropy. this is accomplished through special events and annual major and planned gift fundraising efforts.

Health
3
Shriners Hospital for Children
Philanthropy
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Sharanalayam

Charity organization

Education
6
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
7
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
8
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
9
Dr Samin Sharma Family Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Global Heartcare Foundation
Health
11
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
12
Father's Daymother's Day Council Inc

The father's day/mother's day council, inc. (the "council") is a not-for-profit organization that raises funds from our annual events to help meaningful philanthropies dealing with issues affecting mothers, fathers, and children.the…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shriners Hospitals for Children; the most unlike its peers is Maa Durga Sri Sai Baba Temple Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $13,859 · Housing & ShelterORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INCBROWN GIRLS ON A MISSION INC: $1,500 · Housing & ShelterBROWN GIRLS ON A MISSION INCMAA DURGA SRI SAI BABA TEMPLE INC: $15,074 · ReligionMAA DURGA SRI SAI BABA TEMPLE INCJOURNEY FOR GOOD FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyJOURNEY FOR …ADAM MICHAEL ROSEN FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyADAM MICHAEL…Seniors First Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesOne Heart For Women and Children Inc: $446 · Human ServicesNora Sandigo Children Foundation Inc: $100 · Human ServicesFeeding Children Everywhere Inc: $1,000 · Food & NutritionSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $102 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $50 · HealthLENDING HAND GLOBAL FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Other
Housing & Shelter$15,359Religion$15,074Philanthropy$4,000Human Services$1,546Food & Nutrition$1,000Health$252Other$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAA DURGA SRI SAI BABA TEMPLE INC: $15,074 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $13,859 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJOURNEY FOR GOOD FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetADAM MICHAEL ROSEN FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBROWN GIRLS ON A MISSION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetFeeding Children Everywhere Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeniors First Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOne Heart For Women and Children Inc: $446 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $102 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNora Sandigo Children Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNatl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Duke Energy FoundationNC11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sakhuja Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sakhuja Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sakhuja Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home