Skip to content
Saint Joseph Hospital Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Saint Joseph Hospital Inc

We reveal and foster god's healing love by improving the health of the people and communities we serve, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$8.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$40MEducation$226kCommunity Improvement$52kFood & Nutrition$40kPhilanthropy$25kAnimals$10kHuman Services$8kInternational$6k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $8.5M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERMOUNTAIN MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC$6,858,810
SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,634,474
CROSSPURPOSE$50,000
ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM$39,500
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $75k → 14%INTERMOUNTAIN MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $6.9M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $43k → 12%SCL HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $6.7M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $40k → 12%SCL HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $5.8M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $32k → 12%SCL HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $4.2M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $31k → 12%SCL HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $3.6M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $29k → 12%SCL HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $2.3M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $27k → 12%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $15k → 12%CENTER FOR PERSONALIZED EDUCATION FOR PROFESSIONALS: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN HEALTH: $100k → 12%CROSSPURPOSE: $50k → 12%CROSSPURPOSE: $30k → 12%MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $25k → 12%INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 12%INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 12%DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $10k → 12%INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 12%DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $10k → 12%DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 12%DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $10k → 12%INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 12%DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $10k → 12%INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 12%LA CLINICA TEPEYAC INC: $263k → 12%LA CLINICA TEPEYAC INC: $53k → 12%LA CLINICA TEPEYAC INC: $18k → 12%LA CLINICA TEPEYAC INC: $13k → 12%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $10k → 12%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $10k → 12%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $10k → 12%MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF DENVER: $150k → 12%METRO CARING: $10k → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.9M → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.6M → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.1M → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $997k → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $947k → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $921k → 12%DENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $11k → 12%DENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40M · 10 repeat orgs$390k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$40M
$390k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+37%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LA CLINICA TEPEYAC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $367k · revenue +286%
  • AC
    ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $226k · revenue +31%
  • C
    CROSSPURPOSE
    2× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • MH
    Mental Health Center of Denvergraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +34%
  • CF
    Center for African American Healthgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +37%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
2
Colorado Health Institute
Health
3
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
4
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
7
Hospice of Metro Denver Inc

To encircle those facing advanced illness with unprecedented levels of comfort, compassion, and expertise.

Human Services
8
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
9
Colorado Community Health Network Inc

To increase access to high quality health care for people in need in colorado.

Health
10
Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce

The denver metro chamber of commerce is the architect of tomorrow, igniting change and driving progress to build dynamic economies and communities. we champion innovation, forge powerful partnerships, and relentlessly advocate for our…

—
11
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
12
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is Denver Zoological Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERMOUNTAIN MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $29,496,555 · OtherINTERMOUNTAIN MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC+3 more: $275,538 · OtherSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $9,984,203 · HealthSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDAT…LA CLINICA TEPEYAC: $367,000 · Health+7 more: $374,804 · HealthCenter for African American Health: $100,000 · Community ImprovementCROSSPURPOSE: $80,000 · Community ImprovementMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyDENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $22,000 · PhilanthropyDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · AnimalsJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $6,000 · International
Other$29,772,093Health$10,726,007Community Improvement$180,000Philanthropy$47,000Animals$10,000International$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $9,984,203 over 8y, 39% of budgetLA CLINICA TEPEYAC: $367,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $225,538 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetMental Health Center of Denver: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for African American Health: $100,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCROSSPURPOSE: $80,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $46,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO CARING: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARING FOR COLORADO FOUNDATION: $7,554 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationDelta Dental Plan of …El Pomar FoundationThe Colorado Health F…Colorado Gives Founda…Kaiser Foundation Hea…Schlessman Foundation…The Colorado TrustRose Community Founda…Mile High United Way …Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…
The Denver FoundationCO17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado · Schlessman Foundation Inc · The Colorado Trust · Rose Community Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Saint Joseph Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Saint Joseph Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Saint Joseph Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home