Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Saint Joseph Hospital Inc

We reveal and foster god's healing love by improving the health of the people and communities we serve, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$8.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6.9M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$40MEducation$226kCommunity Improvement$52kFood & Nutrition$40kPhilanthropy$25kAnimals$10kHuman Services$8kInternational$6k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $8.5M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERMOUNTAIN MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC$6,858,810
SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,634,474
CROSSPURPOSE$50,000
ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM$39,500
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $75k → 14%INTERMOUNTAIN MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $6.9M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $43k → 12%SCL HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $6.7M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $40k → 12%SCL HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $5.8M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $32k → 12%SCL HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $4.2M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $31k → 12%SCL HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $3.6M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $29k → 12%SCL HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC: $2.3M → 7%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $27k → 12%ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $15k → 12%CENTER FOR PERSONALIZED EDUCATION FOR PROFESSIONALS: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN HEALTH: $100k → 12%CROSSPURPOSE: $50k → 12%CROSSPURPOSE: $30k → 12%MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $25k → 12%INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 12%DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $10k → 12%DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $10k → 12%INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 12%DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $10k → 12%INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 12%DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $10k → 12%INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 12%DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 12%INNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 12%LA CLINICA TEPEYAC INC: $263k → 12%LA CLINICA TEPEYAC INC: $53k → 12%LA CLINICA TEPEYAC INC: $18k → 12%LA CLINICA TEPEYAC INC: $13k → 12%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $10k → 12%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $10k → 12%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $10k → 12%MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF DENVER: $150k → 12%METRO CARING: $10k → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.9M → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.6M → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.1M → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $997k → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $947k → 12%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $921k → 12%DENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $11k → 12%DENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$40M · 10 repeat orgs$390k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$40M
$390k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+37%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LA CLINICA TEPEYAC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $367k · revenue +286%
  • AC
    ARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $226k · revenue +31%
  • C
    CROSSPURPOSE
    2× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • MH
    Mental Health Center of Denvergraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +34%
  • CF
    Center for African American Healthgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +37%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
2
Colorado Health Institute
Health
3
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
4
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

7
Hospice of Metro Denver Inc

To encircle those facing advanced illness with unprecedented levels of comfort, compassion, and expertise.

Human Services
8
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
9
Colorado Community Health Network Inc

To increase access to high quality health care for people in need in colorado.

Health
10
Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce

The denver metro chamber of commerce is the architect of tomorrow, igniting change and driving progress to build dynamic economies and communities. we champion innovation, forge powerful partnerships, and relentlessly advocate for our…

11
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
12
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Denver Zoological Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERMOUNTAIN MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC — $29,496,555 · OtherINTERMOUNTAIN MEDICAL GROUP - DENVER LLC+3 more — $275,538 · OtherSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $9,984,203 · HealthSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDAT…LA CLINICA TEPEYAC — $367,000 · Health+7 more — $374,804 · HealthCenter for African American Health — $100,000 · Community ImprovementCROSSPURPOSE — $80,000 · Community ImprovementMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyDENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $22,000 · PhilanthropyDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · AnimalsJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC — $6,000 · International
Other$29,772,093Health$10,726,007Community Improvement$180,000Philanthropy$47,000Animals$10,000International$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $9,984,203 over 8y, 39% of budgetLA CLINICA TEPEYAC — $367,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM — $225,538 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetMental Health Center of Denver — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for African American Health — $100,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCROSSPURPOSE — $80,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNER CITY HEALTH CENTER — $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $46,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO CARING — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $22,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARING FOR COLORADO FOUNDATION — $7,554 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado · Schlessman Foundation Inc · The Colorado Trust · Rose Community Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Saint Joseph Hospital Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph