· Public charity
Saint Francis Foundation
The mission of SAINT FRANCIS FOUNDATION is to raise funds and make grants that enhance access to exceptional health care and wellness, delivered with compassion for people and underserved communities in san francisco.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $300k
- $250k+5 grants · $2.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAINT FRANCIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | $967,002 |
| SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $525,000 |
| LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES | $525,000 |
| MAITRI COMPASSIONATE CARE | $325,000 |
| HYDE STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $250,000 |
| LYON-MARTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES | $150,000 |
| CURRY SENIOR CENTER RESPITE & RECUPERATIVE CARE | $150,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO PRIDE | $30,000 |
| SEQUOIA LIVING SF SENIOR CENTER SUPPORT CIRCLES | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UHUCSF HEALTH COMMUNITY HOSPITALS FKA SAINT FRANCIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL5× · 2017–2023 · $11M · revenue +69%
- LSLarkin Street Youth Services3× · 2022–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +7%
- HSHYDE STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES INC3× · 2023–2025 · $735k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- APASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER WELLNESS CENTERone grant, 2021 · $300k
- MHMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCOone grant, 2021 · $274k
- LSLARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICESone grant, 2021 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…
Tndc's mission is to develop community and provide affordable housing and services for people with low incomes in the tenderloin and throughout san francisco, to promote equitable access to opportunity and resources.
The mission of Westside Community Services is to provide high quality, family-centered, culturally competent behavioral health and human services for the residents of the city and county of San Francisco.
To develop and implement programs and to support policies that increase access to community based primary care for the uninsured and underserved patients in the city and county of san francisco.
The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…
Since 1978, our mission has been to preserve and perpetuate San Francisco's history and folklore and to celebrate its rich history of cultural diversity.
To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.
The san diego lgbt community center enhances and sustains the health & well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, transgender, nonbinary, immigrant, and hiv communities to the betterment of our entire san diego region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Senior Center and the most unlike its peers is St Francis Hospital Support Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UCSF HEALTH COMMUNITY HOSPITALS FKA SAINT FRANCIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
- Who funds HYDE STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc ↗
- Who funds MAITRI COMPASSIONATE CARE ↗
- Who funds North of MarketTenderloin Community Benefit Corporation ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CURRY SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds LYON-MARTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LOWER POLK COMMUNITY BENEFIT DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds 826 Valencia ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds URBAN ALCHEMY ↗
- Who funds SF Lesbian Gay Bi Trans Pride Celebration Cmte ↗
- Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE - SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds UPTOWN TENDERLOIN INC ↗
- Who funds Filipino Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BURN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL MARKET DBA MID MARKET COMMUNITY BENEFIT DISTRICT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Horizons Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · McNabb Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Dignity Health · Metta Fund · Extrafood · Tides Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Saint Francis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.