· Private foundation
Sadako K Judd Private Foundation In
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $5,000 |
| NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS | $4,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $4,000 |
| CONSERVANCY OF SW FLORIDA | $3,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREAT NW | $3,000 |
| ABUSE & COUNSELING TREATMENT CTR | $3,000 |
| THE STOREHOUSE | $3,000 |
| BLACK DIAMOND COMMUNITY CENTER | $3,000 |
| MAPLE VALLEY FOOD BANK | $2,487 |
| CENTER FOR GUN VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS | $2,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SWFL | $2,000 |
| STARDUST BIG BAND MEMORIES | $2,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SWFL | $2,000 |
| GUADALUPE CENTER | $2,000 |
| ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
34 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS8× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +165%
THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +561%- FBFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES8× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +74%
Funded once
- LCLEE COUNTY COMMUNITY COOPone grant, 2022 · $7k
- NNNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDSone grant, 2023 · $4k
- TETHE EDUCATIONAL FUND TO STOP GUN VIone grant, 2021 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To prevent and reduce hunger and homelessness in central florida by equipping individuals and families to become self-sufficient through housing, outreach, prevention, and education.
Etfb's mission is to fight hunger and feed hope in east texas.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…
To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Cooperative Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Stardust Memories Big Band Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER ↗
- Who funds MAPLE VALLEY FOOD BANK AND EMERGENCY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds THE STARDUST MEMORIES BIG BAND INC ↗
- Who funds ABUSE COUNSELING & TREATMENT INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds CANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Pathways Early Education Center of Immokalee Inc ↗
- Who funds ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sadako K Judd Private Foundation In funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 11% of income from government
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- St Matthews House Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.