Skip to content
SADA Charity Preview Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

SADA Charity Preview Inc

To raise funds for local charities.

$291k
Granted FY2017
12
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $274,139, the rows itemized in this filing. The $290,720 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,581 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$22,323
Median grant
1
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
David's Refuge$51,195
Maureen's Hope Foundation$47,986
Learning Disabilities Association$26,690
Hospice of CNY$25,749
Meals on Wheels$23,732
National Kidney Foundation$22,323
Make A Wish$20,447
St Camillus Residential Health Care Facility$13,328
Access CNY$11,902
Crouse Health Foundation$11,424
Huntington Family Services$11,351
ARC of Onondaga$8,012
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Huntington Family Services: $11k → 14%ARC of Onondaga: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central New York Quest Inc

Central ny quest has been established to serve the needs of persons with intellectual, developmental and mental health disorders in the central new york region.

Human Services
2
Crouse Community Center Inc

Crouse community center, inc is a residential health care facility whose mission is to provide long term health care, rehabilitation, and adult day care services to area residents requiring 24 hour skilled nursing residential health care…

Health
3
Carefirst Ny Inc

It is the mission of carefirst ny, inc. to affirm life through extraordinary, compassionate support and care to patients and families in chemung, steuben and schuyler counties.

—
4
Oswego Health Inc

The mission of Oswego Health, Inc. is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.

Health
5
Advance Care Alliance of Ny Inc

Advance care alliance of new york, inc. (acany) is dedicated to providing the support and services for you or your loved one with an intellectual or developmental disability need to lead an active, healthy, and fulfilling life. acany was…

Human Services
6
St Luke Residential Health Care Facility Inc

To meet the evolving healthcare needs of our community, st. luke residential healthcare facility, inc. is dedicated to helping the people we serve live to their maximum potential and promote dignity of life throughout all of its stages.

Health
7
Healthcare Choices Ny Inc

Healthcare choices ny, inc., a federally qualified health center licensed by the state of new york is an outpatient health center providing community based health services primarily to persons who may have a mental health diagnosis or be…

Health
8
Cattaraugus Rehabilitation Center Inc

The corporation was formed to operate various programs to assist in the development of the mentally and physically disabled. we assist the people we serve through a continuum of service that fosters community participation and personal…

Human Services
9
Access Supports for Living Inc

Our mission is to help people live the healthiest and fullest lives possible, and our first priority is those who live with the challenges associated with behavioral health issues and developmental disabilities.

Human Services
10
L'arche Syracuse Inc

L'arche syracuse, inc. is a faith based organization. our mission is to (1) make known the gifts of people with developmental disabilities, revealed through mutually transforming relations, (2) foster an environment in community that…

Human Services
11
Leadingage New York Inc

Leadingage new york represents not-for-profit, mission-driven and public continuing care providers, including nursing homes, senior housing, adult care facilities, continuing care retirement communities, assisted living and community…

Civil Rights
12
Cerebral Palsy Associations of New York

The mission of cerebral palsy associations of new york state is to provide for the exchange of ideas, education and communication between groups and people interested in advocacy for people with cerebral palsy and other developmental…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Caring Coalition of Central New York; the most unlike its peers is Maureen's Hope Foundationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $26,690 · OtherLEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK …THE CARING COALITION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK: $25,749 · OtherTHE CARING COALITION OF CENTRAL NEW YORKMEALS ON WHEELS OF SYRACUSE NY INC: $23,732 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF SYRACUSE NY INCNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NE: $22,323 · OtherNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $20,447 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INCST CAMILLUS RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY: $13,328 · OtherST CAMILLUS RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITYDAVID'S REFUGE INC: $51,195 · HealthDAVID'S REFUGE INCACCESSCNY INC: $11,902 · HealthACCESSCNY INCCROUSE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $11,424 · HealthCROUSE HEALTH FOUNDATION INCMAUREEN'S HOPE FOUNDATIONINC: $47,986 · PhilanthropyMAUREEN'S HOPE FOUN…HUNTINGTON FAMILY CENTERS INC: $11,351 · Human ServicesARC OF ONONDAGA FOUNDATION INC: $8,012 · Human Services
Other$132,269Health$74,521Philanthropy$47,986Human Services$19,363

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAVID'S REFUGE INC: $51,195 over 1y, 12% of budgetMAUREEN'S HOPE FOUNDATIONINC: $47,986 over 1y, 33% of budgetLEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $26,690 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE CARING COALITION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK: $25,749 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SYRACUSE NY INC: $23,732 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NE: $22,323 over 1y, 17% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $20,447 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetST CAMILLUS RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY: $13,328 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCESSCNY INC: $11,902 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROUSE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $11,424 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTINGTON FAMILY CENTERS INC: $11,351 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetARC OF ONONDAGA FOUNDATION INC: $8,012 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jim and Juli Boeheim …Kinney Drugs Foundati…Central New York Comm…The John Ben Snow Fou…The Rosamond Gifford …Price Chopper's Golub…Allyn Family Foundati…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Jim and Juli Boeheim Foundation IncNY24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jim and Juli Boeheim Foundation Inc · Kinney Drugs Foundation Inc · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · The John Ben Snow Foundation Inc · The Rosamond Gifford Charitable Corporation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Allyn Family Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization SADA Charity Preview Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from SADA Charity Preview Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to SADA Charity Preview Inc?

    Find your warmest path to SADA Charity Preview Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $208k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on SADA Charity Preview’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home