Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rx Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Health$5.7MPublic Benefit$2.4MCivil Rights$2.2MPhilanthropy$1.4MHuman Services$922kHousing & Shelter$557kScience & Tech$547kEmployment$524kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $250k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.7M
$100,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$57M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A HEALTHIER DEMOCRACY INC$150,000
THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE$150,000
UNITED VISION FOR IDAHO INC$150,000
ORGANIZING EMPOWERMENT FUND$150,000
MHM SUPPORT SERVICES$150,000
IN OUR OWN VOICE NATIONAL BLACK WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE AGENDA$150,000
COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION$150,000
MISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE$150,000
SEA CHANGE RECOVERY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC$150,000
ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SERVICES$150,000
MISSOURI ORGANIZING AND VOTER ENGAGEMENT COLLABORATIVE$150,000
MISSOURI ORGANIZING AND VOTER ENGAGEMENT COLLABORATIVE$115,000
MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INC$100,000
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$100,000
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $647k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STRATEGIC CONCEPTS IN ORGANIZING AND POLICY EDUCATION (SCOPE): $5k → 14%ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SERVICES (ACCESS): $150k → 21%HOLA LAKEWAY: $25k → 15%OPERATION RESTORATION: $25k → 23%LA CASITA CENTER: $25k → 15%ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SERVICES (ACCESS): $150k → 21%HOLA LAKEWAY: $25k → 15%LOUISVILLE URBAN LEAGUE: $25k → 15%ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SERVICES: $150k → 21%LOUISVILLE URBAN LEAGUE: $25k → 15%CONNECT MINISTRIES: $25k → 12%BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM: $17k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
KY
WV
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Rx Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Rx Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 47 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

47 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
30

Total granted

$11M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+14%

Still filing today

81%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $675k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MISSOURI ORGANIZING AND VOTER ENGAGEMENT COLLABORATIVE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $865k · revenue +99%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CATALYST INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $585k · revenue +43%
  • AH
    A HEALTHIER DEMOCRACY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $540k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • BV
    BOSTON VA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $220k · revenue +26%
  • HU
    HARVARD UNIVERSITYARIADNE LABS
    one grant, 2019 · $197k
  • BC
    BRILLIANT CORNERS
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue -71%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
2
National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health
3
CommonHealth Action

CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.

Health
4
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
5
Health in Partnership

Health in Partnership transforms the field of public health to center health equity and builds collective power with social justice movements.

Health
6
HealthImpact

To shape health care through workforce strategy, stakeholder convening, and policy advocacy.

Health
7
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
8
The Asian Americans for Community Involvement of Santa Clara County Inc

To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.

Health
9
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
10
National Alliance of Healthcare Purchaser Coalitions Inc

To accelerate the nation's progress towards safe, efficient, high - quality health care and the improved health status of the american population.

—
11
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
12
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Catalyst Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Women & Girls Leadership De…Community FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Immigrant Worker SupportPregnancy Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesSchool District FoundationsYouth Development ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%13%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/79
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,486

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/75
Grantees still filing
47/75
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC — $375,000 · OtherHEALTH CARE FOR ALL INCCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS — $350,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONSMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $346,754 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDMHM Support Services — $300,000 · OtherALABAMA ARISE ACTION — $225,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INC — $200,000 · OtherHARVARD UNIVERSITYARIADNE LABS — $197,022 · OtherIN OUR OWN VOICE NATIONAL BLACK WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE AGENDA — $300,000 · OtherAPPALACHIAN CITIZENS LAW CENTER INC — $225,000 · OtherALABAMA ARISE — $375,000 · OtherALABAMA ARISEMISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE — $300,000 · Other+26 more — $2,641,570 · Other+26 moreCOMMUNITY CATALYST INC — $585,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY CATALYST INCBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $383,897 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER …Covid Safe at Home Inc — $250,000 · HealthCovid Safe at Home IncTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH — $240,000 · HealthTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUT…COMMUNITY CARE COOPERATIVE INC — $233,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY CARE COOPERA…BOSTON VA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $220,410 · HealthBOSTON VA RESEARCH INS…Doctors for America — $215,000 · HealthDoctors for AmericaSEA CHANGE RECOVERY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC — $150,000 · HealthHEALTH EQUITY SOLUTIONS INC — $150,000 · HealthMaine Health Access Foundation Inc — $129,090 · Health+10 more — $654,395 · Health+10 moreMISSOURI ORGANIZING AND VOTER ENGAGEMENT COLLABORATIVE — $865,000 · Civil RightsMISSOURI ORGANIZI…A HEALTHIER DEMOCRACY INC — $540,000 · Civil RightsA HEALTHIER DEMOC…ORGANIZING EMPOWERMENT FUND INC — $450,000 · Civil RightsORGANIZING EMPOWE…INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT — $178,200 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR HEA…YOUNG INVINCIBLES — $150,000 · Civil RightsYOUNG INVINCIBLESALABAMA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE UNITED — $125,000 · Civil RightsARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $100,000 · Civil RightsUNITED VISION FOR IDAHO INC — $451,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED VISIO…PEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE — $450,000 · Community ImprovementPEOPLE'S ACT…COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION — $450,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON COUNS…BAY AREA WOMEN COALITION INC — $125,000 · Community ImprovementBAY AREA WOM…FAITH IN FLORIDA INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementFAITH IN FLO…EL CENTRO INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementEL CENTRO IN…TRICOUNTY COMMUNITY NETWORK INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementTRICOUNTY CO…+1 more — $50,000 · Community ImprovementWEST VIRGINIANS FOR AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE — $451,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $200,000 · EducationBRILLIANT CORNERS — $150,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $101,320 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $73,942 · EducationNEW JERSEY RESOURCE PROJECT INC — $50,000 · Education+1 more — $3,000 · EducationTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $706,001 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPY MASSACHUSETTS INC — $149,655 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER FAMILY FUND INC — $100,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S — $450,000 · Human ServicesLA CASITA CENTER INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesHOLA LAKEWAY — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE LOUISVILLE URBAN LEAGUE INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION RESTORATION — $25,000 · Human ServicesCONNECT MINISTRIES — $25,000 · Human Services+2 more — $22,000 · Human Services
Other$5,835,346Health$3,210,792Civil Rights$2,408,200Community Improvement$1,826,000Education$1,029,262Philanthropy$960,656Human Services$722,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMISSOURI ORGANIZING AND VOTER ENGAGEMENT COLLABORATIVE — $865,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $706,001 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CATALYST INC — $585,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetA HEALTHIER DEMOCRACY INC — $540,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetUNITED VISION FOR IDAHO INC — $451,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetWEST VIRGINIANS FOR AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE — $451,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S — $450,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE — $450,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION — $450,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetORGANIZING EMPOWERMENT FUND INC — $450,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $383,897 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC — $375,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetALABAMA ARISE — $375,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetMHM Support Services — $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIN OUR OWN VOICE NATIONAL BLACK WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE AGENDA — $300,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE — $300,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetCovid Safe at Home Inc — $250,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH — $240,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE COOPERATIVE INC — $233,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAPPALACHIAN CITIZENS LAW CENTER INC — $225,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetBOSTON VA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $220,410 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetDoctors for America — $215,000 over 2y, 59% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT — $178,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHealth Care Without Walls Inc — $178,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC — $165,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSEA CHANGE RECOVERY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC — $150,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $150,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTENNESSEE HEALTH CARE CAMPAIGN INC — $150,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBRILLIANT CORNERS — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG INVINCIBLES — $150,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHEALTH EQUITY SOLUTIONS INC — $150,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC — $150,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPHILANTHROPY MASSACHUSETTS INC — $149,655 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCOUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE INC — $125,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetALABAMA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE UNITED — $125,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetBAY AREA WOMEN COALITION INC — $125,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetUTEC Inc — $125,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PATIENT EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC — $102,720 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $101,320 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Direction Healthcare Solutions — $100,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROCKEFELLER FAMILY FUND INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAITH IN FLORIDA INC — $100,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetLA CASITA CENTER INC — $100,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetEL CENTRO INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Venture FundCommunity Catalyst IncAmalgamated Charitabl…The Ford FoundationThe Robert Wood Johns…Wellspring Philanthro…Windward FundTides FoundationNEO Philanthropy IncWK Kellogg FoundationThe David and Lucile …Proteus Fund Inc
New Venture FundDC33.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Venture Fund · Community Catalyst Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Windward Fund · Tides Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rx Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Community Care Cooperative Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Boston Va Research Institute Inc — 64% of income from government
  • Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Health Care for All Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Community Catalyst Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Health Equity Solutions Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Legal Services Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Greenroots Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Covid Safe at Home Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement — 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rx Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rx Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines