Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruth a McDaniel Animal Welfare Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$238k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$787k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION$8,000
STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE INC$7,000
GREAT PLAINS SPCA$5,000
MEOW MISSION INC$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$3,000
LUCKY 13 RESCUE INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREAT PLAINS SPCA: $5k → 5%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON: $4k → 15%STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE: $11k → 13%PAWSIBILITIES: $5k → 14%MEOW MISSION INC: $6k → 15%RESCUE ONE: $5k → 15%LUCKY 13 RESCUE INC: $2k → 15%FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF: $8k → 18%R A V E RESCUE: $4k → 20%MISSOURI STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $8k → 21%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON: $4k → 15%STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE: $7k → 13%PAWSIBILITIES: $5k → 14%MEOW MISSION INC: $6k → 15%CASTAWAY ANIMAL RESCUE EFFORT: $10k → 15%LUCKY 13 RESCUE INC: $2k → 15%FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF: $5k → 18%MISSOURI STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $7k → 21%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON: $4k → 15%STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $7k → 13%PAWSIBILITIES: $5k → 14%MEOW MISSION INC: $5k → 15%LUCKY 13 RESCUE INC: $2k → 15%FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF: $5k → 18%MISSOURI STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $7k → 21%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON: $3k → 15%SOCIETY FOR THE TREATMENT OF: $6k → 13%MEOW MISSION INC: $5k → 15%FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF: $5k → 18%MISSOURI STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $7k → 21%HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $3k → 15%SOCIETY FOR THE TREATMENT OF: $6k → 13%MEOW MISSION INC: $3k → 15%FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF: $5k → 18%MISSOURI STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $4k → 21%STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE: $5k → 13%MEOW MISSION INC: $3k → 15%FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF: $5k → 18%STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE: $5k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF: $4k → 18%STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE: $4k → 13%STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE: $4k → 13%STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$205k · 9 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$205k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+191%

Still filing today

44%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $45k · revenue +13%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF ST JOSEPH INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $37k · revenue +211%
  • L1
    LUCKY 13 RESCUE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • CA
    Castaway Animals Rescue Effort
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • SN
    SPAY & NEUTER KANSAS CITY D/B/A PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +191%
  • RO
    Rescue Onegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +401%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pound Pets Inc

Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats

Animals
2
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
3
Safe Harbor Animal Sanctuary

Protect and rescue abandoned and at-risk animals.

Animals
4
K911

To rescue abandoned and displaced cats and dogs, bring them back to health, provide all medical and prepare them for their new home

Animals
5
Raskels Rescue
Animals
6
Humane Society of Union County Inc

The Humane Society of Union County exists to reduce the number of abused, abandoned, and neglected cats and dogs through rescue, rehabilitation, adoption, and spay and neuter.

Animals
7
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
8
Humane Society of Central Illinois

HSCIs mission is to find loving, forever homes for abused and unwanted pets.

Animals
9
Humane Society of Southwest Missouri

The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…

Animals
10
Jefferson County Humane Society Inc

Animal protection and preservation

Animals
11
Cats At the Studios Inc

Cat rescue spay/ nueter

Animals
12
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spay & Neuter Kansas City D/B/a Pet Resource Center of Kansas City; the most unlike its peers is The Humane Society of Atchison Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $44,800 · AnimalsSTOVER ANIMAL RESCUE INCFRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF ST JOSEPH INC: $37,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF ST JOSEPH INCTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON INC: $15,200 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON INCCastaway Animals Rescue Effort: $10,000 · AnimalsCastaway Animals Rescue EffortLUCKY 13 RESCUE INC: $6,000 · AnimalsSPAY & NEUTER KANSAS CITY D/B/A PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITY: $6,000 · AnimalsGREAT PLAINS SPCA: $5,000 · AnimalsRescue One: $5,000 · Animals+1 more: $3,000 · AnimalsMISSOURI STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $33,000 · OtherMISSOURI STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATIONMEOW MISSION INC: $28,000 · OtherMEOW MISSION INCPAWSIBILITIES: $15,000 · OtherPAWSIBILITIESSTAFF: $14,000 · OtherSTAFFSOCIETY FOR THE TREATMENT OF: $12,000 · OtherSOCIETY FOR THE TREATMENT OF+1 more: $3,500 · Other
Animals$132,000Other$105,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTOVER ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $44,800 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF ST JOSEPH INC: $37,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON INC: $15,200 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCastaway Animals Rescue Effort: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLUCKY 13 RESCUE INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSPAY & NEUTER KANSAS CITY D/B/A PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRescue One: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STOVER ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF ST JOSEPH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON INC ↗
  • Who funds Castaway Animals Rescue Effort ↗
  • Who funds LUCKY 13 RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPAY & NEUTER KANSAS CITY D/B/A PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS SPCA ↗
  • Who funds Rescue One ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Humane World for Animals IncDC17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Humane World for Animals Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr · Aetna Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruth a McDaniel Animal Welfare Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruth a McDaniel Animal Welfare Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ruth a McDaniel Animal Welfare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph