Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rusty Pulliam Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$715k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$365k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.5MReligion$816kHealth$350kHuman Services$255kRecreation & Sports$115kHousing & Shelter$75kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kCommunity Improvement$25k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $365k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$252
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Montreat College$365,000
Crossfire Ministries$125,000
ABCCM$100,000
Swing King University$30,000
Asheville Area Habitat for Humanity$25,000
Timothy Brown Ministries$25,000
Kenilworth Presbyterian Church$25,000
Sports Outreach$15,000
Coaches Quest$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $255k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Givens Estates: $125k → 12%Givens Estates: $105k → 12%GIVENS ESTATES: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 11 repeat orgs$170k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$3.0M
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+34%

Still filing today

55%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GIVENS ESTATES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $255k · revenue +45%
  • AC
    Asheville Christian Academy Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $180k · revenue +142%
  • TB
    Timothy Brown Ministries Corp
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +6% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • TA
    The Asheville Police Department Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • TR
    TC Roberson Rams Club Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +38%
  • QE
    QB1 Enterprises Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville Classical Academy

Provide a distinctly Christ-centered, biblical and classical education producing students who glorify God in their thoughts, words and deeds.

Education
2
Oconee Christian Academy

Oconee Christian Academy exists to glorify God by nurturing students and equipping them to fulfill God's unique purpose for their lives.

Education
3
Carolina Christian Academy

Educational instruciton for students in prek-12th grades.

—
4
Mt Pisgah Christian School Inc

Mount Pisgah Christian School provides an outstanding college preparatory education grounded in Christian faith and values.

Education
5
Greater Raleigh Area Christian Education Inc

Grace christian school is a loving community that spiritually and academically equips, challenges, and inspires students to impact their world for christ.

Education
6
Alamance Christian School Inc

The purpose of the school is to organize and operate a school which will provide a standard of scholastic excellence serving students from pre-kindergarten through grade 12.

—
7
Invest Collegiate Imagine Inc

Ic imagine's mission is to champion an inclusive environment for academic excellence, strong relationships, physical and mental well-being, creativity, and exploration. ic imagine graduates are engaged citizens prepared to succeed in…

Education
8
Hope Academy of Charlotte Inc

Christ-centered, college preparatory, academic program.

Education
9
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
10
Harrells Christian Academy

The mission of harrells christian academy is to prepare each student for higher education within an environment that instills judeo-christian values, fosters self-discipline, enhances creativity, and promises a love and respect for…

Education
11
Southeastern Bible College

The mission of Souteastern Bible College is to promote Christian education. The Organization's board made the decision that a transfer of the net assets to a previously described university would be the best use of the net assets of the…

—
12
Erskine College and Theological Seminary

Erskine College exists to glorify God as a Christian academic community where students are equipped to flourish as whole persons for lives of service through the pursuit of undergraduate liberal arts and graduate theological education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asheville Christian Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Peak Academy Charter School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONTREAT COLLEGE: $1,265,000 · EducationMONTREAT COLLEGEAsheville Christian Academy Inc: $180,000 · EducationAsheville Christian Academy IncCrossfire Ministries: $636,000 · OtherCrossfire MinistriesABCCM: $360,000 · OtherABCCMKenilworth Presbyterian Church: $75,000 · OtherKenilworth Presbyterian ChurchSPORTS OUTREACH: $60,000 · Other+8 more: $155,000 · Other+8 moreTHE GIVENS ESTATES INC: $255,000 · Human ServicesTHE GIVEN…Timothy Brown Ministries Corp: $75,000 · ReligionASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Asheville Police Department Foundation: $40,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$1,445,000Other$1,286,000Human Services$255,000Religion$75,000Housing & Shelter$75,000Crime & Legal$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTREAT COLLEGE: $1,265,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE GIVENS ESTATES INC: $255,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAsheville Christian Academy Inc: $180,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTimothy Brown Ministries Corp: $75,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSPORTS OUTREACH: $60,000 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetThe Asheville Police Department Foundation: $40,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTC Roberson Rams Club Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetPEAK Academy Charter School: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONTREAT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVENS ESTATES INC ↗
  • Who funds Asheville Christian Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds Timothy Brown Ministries Corp ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SPORTS OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds The Asheville Police Department Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TC Roberson Rams Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEAK Academy Charter School ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Dogwood Health Trust · Foundation for the Carolinas · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rusty Pulliam Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rusty Pulliam Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rusty Pulliam’s filings →

    More from the funding graph