Skip to content

· Private foundation

Russell W Butterworth Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$201k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$402kHealth$202kHuman Services$168kHousing & Shelter$158kFood & Nutrition$119kRecreation & Sports$113kReligion$72kCommunity Improvement$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $160k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANT WITH PURPOSE$30,000
ONE ATTA TIME$30,000
FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES$20,000
RIZE FOUNDATION$10,000
LEXINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$10,000
PROJECT MEXICO$10,000
1MISSION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NEW HANOVER LIONS CLUB$10,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$10,000
SHARING GOD'S LOVE$10,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$5,000
RICHFIELD FOUNDATION$5,000
GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PALMETTO ANIMAL ASSISTED LIFE SERVI: $5k → 16%FAIRWAYS FOR WARRIORS: $3k → 10%PAWS 4 PEOPLE FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%THE HARBOUR: $600 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
OH
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 34 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
28

Total granted

$1.4M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+13%

Still filing today

53%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FLORESTA USA INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $304k · revenue +280%
  • FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +94%
  • GS
    Good Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • RF
    RIZA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • RP
    RIZE Prevention Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +311%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
3
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
4
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
7
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
8
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

—
9
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
11
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
12
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Sc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lexington Police Department Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
29/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRIZE FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherRIZE FOUNDATIONPALMETTO FOUNDATION FOR PREVENTION: $60,000 · OtherPALMETTO FOUNDATION FOR PREVENTIONPROJECT MEXICO: $50,000 · OtherPROJECT MEXICOGOOD NEIGHBORS INC: $35,300 · OtherGOOD NEIGHBORS INCSHARING GODS LOVE INC: $35,000 · OtherNEW HANOVER LIONS CLUB: $26,500 · OtherOliver Gospel Mission: $30,000 · Other+41 more: $240,700 · Other+41 moreFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $304,400 · InternationalFLORESTA USA INCORPORATEDONE MISSION INC DBA 1MISSION: $43,000 · InternationalONE MISSION INC DBA 1MISSIONONE ATTA TIME INC: $30,000 · InternationalONE ATTA TIME INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $14,000 · International+3 more: $17,500 · InternationalFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $119,500 · PhilanthropyFAMILY ASS…RICHFIELD FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyRICHFIELD …Good Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc: $110,000 · Housing & ShelterAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $46,000 · Food & NutritionHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $30,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $5,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $3,000 · Food & NutritionSaluda Shoals Foundation: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsMidlands Fatherhood Coalition: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsTWIN CITIES IN MOTION: $4,500 · Recreation & SportsFREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $60,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC: $5,000 · HealthFBI AGENTS ASSOCIATION MEMORIAL COLLEGE FUND: $3,000 · Health
Other$657,500International$408,900Philanthropy$139,500Housing & Shelter$110,000Food & Nutrition$84,000Recreation & Sports$79,500Health$68,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $304,400 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $119,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetGood Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc: $110,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetSaluda Shoals Foundation: $60,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetFREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $46,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetONE MISSION INC DBA 1MISSION: $43,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBORS INC: $35,300 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOliver Gospel Mission: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetONE ATTA TIME INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRICHFIELD FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetRIZE Prevention Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BUFFALO & WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMidlands Fatherhood Coalition: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD FRIENDS OF WILMINGTON: $10,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRIME STOPPERS OF THE MIDLANDS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 38% of budgetPhoenix Employment Services of Wilmingto Inc DBA StepUp Wilmington: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPALMETTO ANIMAL ASSISTED LIFE SERVI: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSIST INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWIN CITIES IN MOTION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetProject Hope Alliance: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEXINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetFairways for Warriors Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH LAWNDALE COLLEGE PREPARATORY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR PAWS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPurpose Driven Connection DBA Pastor Ricks Daily Hope: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARBOUR INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLORESTA USA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Good Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc ↗
  • Who funds Saluda Shoals Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds ONE MISSION INC DBA 1MISSION ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Oliver Gospel Mission ↗
  • Who funds ONE ATTA TIME INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHFIELD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIZE Prevention Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BUFFALO & WESTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Midlands Fatherhood Coalition ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD FRIENDS OF WILMINGTON ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds CRIME STOPPERS OF THE MIDLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Employment Services of Wilmingto Inc DBA StepUp Wilmington ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC ↗
  • Who funds PALMETTO ANIMAL ASSISTED LIFE SERVI ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Michael J Mungo Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Servant Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Russell W Butterworth Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Russell W Butterworth Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Russell W Butterworth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph