Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rural Futures Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$321k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$311k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$3.1MEnvironment$435kHuman Services$126kPhilanthropy$328
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $328
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $311k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rural Youth Institute$310,666
University of Maine$10,000
Maine Philanthropy Center$328
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%KIEVE-WAVUS EDUCATION: $126k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 8 repeat orgs$557k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$3.2M
$557k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+25%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $328 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Maine Seacoast Mission
    5× · 2017–2024 · $476k · revenue +76%
  • CF
    Chewonki Foundation Inc
    4× · 2017–2022 · $435k · revenue +6%
  • RY
    Rural Youth Institute
    3× · 2023–2025 · $418k · revenue +460% · 52% of their budget

Funded once

  • SO
    SEEDS OF INDEPENDENCE
    one grant, 2017 · $130k · revenue -85% · 47% of their budget
  • KW
    Kieve Wavus Education Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $126k · revenue +25%
  • MY
    MAINE YOUTH ALLIANCE DBA THE GAME LOFT
    one grant, 2017 · $126k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maine Center for Coastal Fisheries

Secure a sustainable future for fisheries and fishing communities in Eastern Maine and beyond.

Science & Tech
2
Maine GearShare

To provide access to outdoor gear and know-how through a collaborative, equity-centered approach.

Recreation & Sports
3
Ecology Learning Center

The mission of the ecology learning center is to deeply root students in Maine's ecological & cultural landscapes, foster authentic real-world learning through mentorship & craft, and cultivate compassionate and resilient leaders prepared…

—
4
Maine Media College

Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…

—
5
Teens to Trails

To connect Maine students to life-changing outdoor experiences.

Youth Development
6
Maine Association for the Education of Young Children

MaineAEYC promotes high-quality early learning for each and every child, birth through age 8, by connecting practice, policy, and research. We advance a diverse, dynamic early childhood profession and support all who care for, educate, and…

Education
7
Maine Climate Action Now

MCAN catalyzes transformative education and action in response to the climate crisis. We seek to honor, unite and amplify the voices of youth, frontline communities, and others historically excluded from the climate conversation and…

Environment
8
Maine Outdoor Brands Inc

To work with individuals and organizations from the public and private sectors to help drive Maine's $3 billion outdoor recreation economy to create a brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
9
Maine Technology Institute

The Institute, through a public and private partnership, shall encourage, promote, stimulate and support research and development activity leading to the commercialization of new products and services in Maine's technology-intensive…

Education
10
Mt Desert Island Ymca

The mission of the Mount Desert Island YMCA is to develop community, character, personal growth and wellness in spirit, mind, and body for the greater Mount Desert Island community.

Human Services
11
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Mid-Maine

Role models (bigs) in one-to-one friendships in seven counties throughout Eastern, Coastal, and Central Maine. They partner with parents, in conjunction with over 30 schools and hundreds of volunteers and generous partners in our community…

—
12
Friends of Explorer Post 58

Youth Outdoor Education

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trekkers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Apex Youth Connection. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Maine: $501,080 · OtherUniversity of MaineOld-Town Orono YMCA: $486,520 · OtherOld-Town Orono YMCAMaine Seacoast Mission: $476,489 · OtherMaine Seacoast MissionMAINE YOUTH ALLIANCE DBA THE GAME LOFT: $126,306 · OtherMAINE YOUTH ALLIANCE DBA THE GAME LOFTApex Youth Connection (formerly known as the Community Bicycle Center): $89,710 · OtherMidcoast Youth Alliance: $85,000 · OtherMAINE YOUTH ALLIANCE: $358,547 · Youth DevelopmentMAINE YOUTH ALLIANCEAPEX YOUTH CONNECTION: $168,387 · Youth DevelopmentAPEX YOUTH CONNECTIO…SEEDS OF INDEPENDENCE: $129,697 · Youth DevelopmentSEEDS OF INDEPENDENC…Chewonki Foundation Inc: $434,521 · EnvironmentChewonki Foun…Rural Youth Institute: $418,370 · EducationRural Youth …+1 more: $328 · EducationTREKKERS INC: $308,118 · Recreation & SportsTREKKERS …Kieve Wavus Education Inc: $126,403 · Human Services
Other$1,765,105Youth Development$656,631Environment$434,521Education$418,698Recreation & Sports$308,118Human Services$126,403

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMaine Seacoast Mission: $476,489 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetChewonki Foundation Inc: $434,521 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetRural Youth Institute: $418,370 over 3y, 52% of budgetMAINE YOUTH ALLIANCE: $358,547 over 5y, 28% of budgetTREKKERS INC: $308,118 over 2y, 36% of budgetAPEX YOUTH CONNECTION: $168,387 over 2y, 46% of budgetSEEDS OF INDEPENDENCE: $129,697 over 1y, 47% of budgetKieve Wavus Education Inc: $126,403 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Maine Seacoast Mission ↗
  • Who funds Chewonki Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rural Youth Institute ↗
  • Who funds MAINE YOUTH ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds TREKKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds APEX YOUTH CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds Kieve Wavus Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds Maine Philanthropy Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · John T Gorman Foundation · Onion Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rural Futures Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rural Futures Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rural Futures Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Rural Futures Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rural Futures’ filings →

    More from the funding graph