Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rowan T O'Riley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$292k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$431kHealth$426kEducation$260kEnvironment$191kCivil Rights$134kPublic Safety & Disaster$99kFood & Nutrition$78kHousing & Shelter$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $264k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES$30,000
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE FUND$30,000
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY$20,000
NEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITAL$20,000
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF$20,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$16,000
MCLEAN HOSPITAL$15,000
STOP HANDGUN VIOLENCE$13,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
UNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATIONINC$10,000
PINE STREET INN$10,000
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$10,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $149k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $9k → 14%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
NE
KY
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 30 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
5

Total granted

$2.0M
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
-2%

Still filing today

53%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    9× · 2017–2025 · $186k · revenue +76%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +120%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $127k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • WT
    WBUR - TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • N
    NAACP
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • TG
    TRANSLATE GENDER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
8
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
9
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
10
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
11
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
12
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Collective Power Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE FUND: $191,000 · OtherNATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE FUNDTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $127,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYNEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherNEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITALGI CHIEF FUND - NEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITAL: $80,000 · OtherGI CHIEF FUND - NEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITALGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $78,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $72,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUSET FOUNDATION: $72,000 · OtherUSET FOUNDATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $65,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODIndividual grant recipient: $49,000 · OtherFAYERWEATHER SCHOOL: $43,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $43,000 · Other+16 more: $290,000 · Other+16 moreUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $186,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES …POLARIS PROJECT: $75,000 · InternationalPOLARIS PROJEC…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $170,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN …Children's Hospital Corporation: $65,000 · HealthChildren's H…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $84,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesWellesley College: $90,000 · EducationTRANSLATE GENDER INC: $5,000 · EducationSTOP HANDGUN VIOLENCE INC: $64,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $700 · Crime & LegalNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $20,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,210,000International$261,000Health$235,000Human Services$149,000Education$95,000Crime & Legal$64,700Civil Rights$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $186,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $170,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $127,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $84,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $78,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $75,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $65,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $65,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSTOP HANDGUN VIOLENCE INC: $64,000 over 9y, 14% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $43,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES DRESSAGE FEDERATION: $39,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWELLESLEY FRIENDLY AID ASSOCIATION: $18,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetCOLLECTIVE POWER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSLATE GENDER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE DRESSAGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIMPACT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPARENTS HELPING PARENTS - THE ROUNDTABLE OF SUPPORT INC: $700 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Wellesley College ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds STOP HANDGUN VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES DRESSAGE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds DOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds ACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLESLEY FRIENDLY AID ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COLLECTIVE POWER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSLATE GENDER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DRESSAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS HELPING PARENTS - THE ROUNDTABLE OF SUPPORT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rowan T O'Riley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rowan T O'Riley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Impact Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • Documentary Educational Resources Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rowan T O'Riley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph