Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rouse Family Charitable Trust Aka the Willard G Rouse III Memorial Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$127k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$489kEnvironment$124kEducation$100kInternational$54kHousing & Shelter$38kFood & Nutrition$37kHuman Services$25kYouth Development$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEWA WILDLIFE CONSERVANCY$54,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$15,000
MOTHERS OUT FRONT$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN$5,000
PAWS$5,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHESTER PA$5,000
CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$5,000
BROOKLINE ARTS CENTER$5,000
PROJECT HOME$3,000
SEACOAST WOMENS GIVING CIRCLE$2,500
WILLIAM TRIPPLEY YOUTH DEV FOUND$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTIONS: $10k → 8%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTIONS: $5k → 8%PROJECT HOME: $5k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $5k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
NV
IN
PA
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$778k · 27 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
22

Total granted

$778k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-16%

Still filing today

63%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LW
    Lewa Wildlife Conservancy USA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $436k · revenue +49%
  • AT
    AMBOSELI TRUST FOR ELEPHANTS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +369%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • FC
    FOCUSED CONSERVATION SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • RT
    READING TERMINAL MARKET CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +36%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
2
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
8
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
9
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
10
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
11
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
12
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Finding Shelter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lewa Wildlife Conservancy USA: $435,500 · AnimalsLewa Wildlife Conservancy USAAMBOSELI TRUST FOR ELEPHANTS: $20,000 · Animals+4 more: $17,000 · AnimalsFOCUSED CONSERVATION SOLUTIONS: $30,000 · OtherFOCUSED CONSERVATION S…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN: $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CA…Individual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recip…PETS FOR THE HOMELESS: $11,000 · OtherPETS FOR THE HOMELESSSMITH HILLL COMMMUNITY DEV: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PA: $10,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHESTER PA: $10,000 · OtherCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $11,000 · OtherCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BA…GIRLS ON THE RUN PHILADELPHIA: $9,000 · Other+23 more: $78,500 · Other+23 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $70,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF…WILLIAM TRIPPLEY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FTD: $13,500 · EducationWILLIAM TRI…SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS EDUCATION INITIATIVE INC: $9,000 · EducationSUSTAINABLE…+1 more: $3,000 · EducationMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC: $70,000 · EnvironmentMOTHERS O…SPEAK FOR THE TREES INC: $14,000 · EnvironmentSPEAK FOR…+1 more: $2,500 · EnvironmentPROJECT HOME: $28,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 · InternationalTHE BOMA PROJECT INC: $12,000 · InternationalREADING TERMINAL MARKET CORPORATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $5,000 · PhilanthropySEACOAST WOMENS GIVING CIRCLE: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Animals$472,500Other$196,500Education$95,500Environment$86,500Human Services$47,000International$47,000Philanthropy$37,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA: $435,500 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC: $70,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREADING TERMINAL MARKET CORPORATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMBOSELI TRUST FOR ELEPHANTS: $20,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPEAK FOR THE TREES INC: $14,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetWILLIAM TRIPPLEY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FTD: $13,500 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetTHE BOMA PROJECT INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN PHILADELPHIA: $9,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSUSTAINABLE BUSINESS EDUCATION INITIATIVE INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLINE FOOD PANTRY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWILDLIFE GUARDIANS: $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWRITERS WITHOUT MARGINS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSIDE OUT STUDIO INC: $3,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetFINDING SHELTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBear Yuba Land Trust: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEACOAST WOMENS GIVING CIRCLE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALNUT STREET THEATRE CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lewa Wildlife Conservancy USA ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS OUT FRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds READING TERMINAL MARKET CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds AMBOSELI TRUST FOR ELEPHANTS ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SPEAK FOR THE TREES INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM TRIPPLEY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FTD ↗
  • Who funds THE BOMA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS EDUCATION INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLINE FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Brookline Arts Center ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE GUARDIANS ↗
  • Who funds WRITERS WITHOUT MARGINS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rouse Family Charitable Trust Aka the Willard G Rouse III Memorial Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rouse Family Charitable Trust Aka the Willard G Rouse III Memorial Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Speak for the Trees Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Brookline Arts Center: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rouse Family Charitable Trust Aka the Willard G Rouse III Memorial Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph