Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rothenbuhler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$765kRecreation & Sports$276kEmployment$136kHuman Services$54kEducation$32kFood & Nutrition$15kAnimals$5kCrime & Legal$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$7,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$132k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Truth For Life$50,000
Two Foundation$24,000
Silver Church Creek$14,000
Grace Bible Church$9,000
Parkside Church$7,000
Fieldstone Counseling$7,000
ACE Community Education$3,500
Dairy Cattle Welfare Council$1,000
Haven Amish Community Youth Center$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Nova Womens Health: $370 → 12%FIELDSTONE COUNSELING: $500 → 16%Fieldstone Counseling: $15k → 13%Fieldstone Counseling: $15k → 13%Fieldstone Counseling: $7k → 13%Fieldstone Counseling: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 40% of Rothenbuhler Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 59% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Rothenbuhler Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 11 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +144% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$1.3M
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+144%
+18%

Still filing today

73%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEmploymentAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TRUTH FOR LIFE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $578k · revenue +103%
  • AF
    AMBASSADORS FOOTBALL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $274k · revenue +35%
  • TF
    TWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $136k · revenue +810%

Funded once

  • JA
    JONI AND FRIENDSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +66%
  • GC
    GRACE CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • CA
    CARDINAL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -69%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

2
Redeemed Christian Church of God

To strengthen marriages and families, to encourage Christian fellowship as we evangelize the lost around us and minister to the needy with the resources God has blessed us.

Religion
3
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

4
Association of Certified Biblical

Training & certification of christian biblical counselors

5
Plain Truth Ministries Worldwide

Ptm worldwide publishes christianity without the religion magazine and plain truth magazine. ptm further serves with daily radio programs, blogs, bible surveys and many other free inspirational resources on its website, www.ptm.org

Religion
6
Jon Potter Ministries Inc

This ministry functions as a teaching and counseling ministry that conducts bible study meetings not in a formal church setting. it provides individual biblical counseling

Religion
7
Biblical Counseling and Training Ministries

To teach individuals how to apply the wisdom and depth of the bible's grace-centered message to the problems of daily living; and through various means, work to restore chirst to counseling and christ-centered counseling to the church.

8
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
9
Faith to Faith Ministry Faith to Fatih Ministry

Radio braodcast

Religion
10
Christian Publications

The oeganization's mission is to have radio and tv interviews on world news from a biblical perspective. write a weekly news report on world news from a bibical perspective and evangelize.

11
Divine Romance Ministries

Divine Romance Ministries Inc provides Christ-centered mentoringcoaching Our goal is to strengthen christian marriages in an effort to eliminate divorce The focus of our message is a complete and total submission to the Lord Jesus Christ 1…

Religion
12
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joni and Friends and the most unlike its peers is Heritage Classical Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUTH FOR LIFE — $578,000 · ReligionTRUTH FOR LIFE+1 more — $500 · ReligionAMBASSADORS FOOTBALL — $274,000 · Recreation & SportsAMBASSADORS FOOTBALLPARKSIDE CHURCH — $148,000 · OtherPARKSIDE CHURCHGrace Bible Church — $30,000 · OtherGrace Bible ChurchDOUBLE HARVEST INC — $14,540 · OtherDOUBLE HARVEST INCSilver Church Creek — $14,000 · OtherSilver Church Creek+9 more — $15,900 · Other+9 moreTWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE — $136,000 · EmploymentTWO FOUNDAT…FIELDSTONE COUNSELING INC — $38,500 · Human Services+1 more — $370 · Human ServicesHERITAGE CLASSICAL ACADEMY — $28,000 · EducationThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago — $5,000 · EducationDAIRY CATTLE WELFARE COUNCIL — $5,000 · AnimalsCARDINAL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS — $1,663 · Philanthropy
Religion$578,500Recreation & Sports$274,000Other$222,440Employment$136,000Human Services$38,870Education$33,000Animals$5,000Philanthropy$1,663

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUTH FOR LIFE — $578,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetAMBASSADORS FOOTBALL — $274,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetTWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE — $136,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetFIELDSTONE COUNSELING INC — $38,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetHERITAGE CLASSICAL ACADEMY — $28,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDOUBLE HARVEST INC — $14,540 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetDAIRY CATTLE WELFARE COUNCIL — $5,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MISSING LINK INC — $4,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARDINAL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS — $1,663 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAKRON PREGNANCY SERVICES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOVA WOMEN'S HEALTH — $370 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUTH FOR LIFE
  • Who funds AMBASSADORS FOOTBALL
  • Who funds TWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE
  • Who funds FIELDSTONE COUNSELING INC
  • Who funds HERITAGE CLASSICAL ACADEMY
  • Who funds DOUBLE HARVEST INC
  • Who funds DAIRY CATTLE WELFARE COUNCIL
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago
  • Who funds THE MISSING LINK INC
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS
  • Who funds CARDINAL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS
  • Who funds AKRON PREGNANCY SERVICES
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds NOVA WOMEN'S HEALTH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

In His Steps FoundationOH17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: In His Steps Foundation · Richards Family Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rothenbuhler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rothenbuhler Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rothenbuhler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph