Skip to content

· Public charity

Rotary Club of Denver Se Foundation

To make donations, contributions, gifts and give aid to established charitable, scientific, and educational agencies or institutions.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$131kHuman Services$77kInternational$56kEducation$41kHealth$31kCommunity Improvement$30kPhilanthropy$26kFood & Nutrition$15k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $40,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $191,117 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $151,117 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$26,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Epic Day of Service Fdnt Inc$26,000
Rocky Mntn RYLA$14,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 85% of grant dollars ($344k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 15% that went abroad ($63k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Florence Crittenton School: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 15% of all-years giving ($63k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Thailand$40k · 2 grants
Cameroon$23k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$231k · 6 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

$231k
$149k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+1%

Still filing today

67%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GD
    GLOBAL DENTAL RELIEF
    2× · 2020–2021 · $56k · revenue +61%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN RYLA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $47k · revenue +74%
  • CD
    COLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • IH
    I Have a Dream Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
  • CW
    Cameroon Wash Bank of Kumbo
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • GIVEDIRECTLY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Health Institute
Health
2
Denver Children's Home

Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.

Health
3
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
4
Developmental Fx Developmental & Fragile X Resource

The mission of dfx is to prepare children with developmental differences for a bright future of engaged belonging by equipping them, their families, therapists, and teachers via innovative programming in colorado and around the world.

Health
5
Denver Scholarship Foundation

Denver scholarship foundation (dsf) inspires and empowers denver public schools (dps) students to enroll in and graduate from postsecondary institutions of higher education by providing the tools, knowledge, and financial resources for…

Education
6
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
7
Dental Aid

Dental aid strives to improve the quality of life of children and adults struggling to afford health care by providing compassionate, high quality dental care and education, while advocating to ensure access to care.

Health
8
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
9
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
10
Caring for Denver Foundation

To address denver's mental health and substance misuse needs by growing community informed solutions and turning the community's desire to help into action.

Health
11
Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc

To elevate the well-being of all coloradans by advancing oral health equity. our strategic focus areas are access to care, prevention, and connections to overall health.

Philanthropy
12
Colorado Wellness Center for Girls
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of the Rockies; the most unlike its peers is Global Dental Relief. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rocky Mountain RYLA: $55,058 · OtherRocky Mountain RYLAAmerican Women's Club of Thailand: $39,800 · OtherAmerican Women's Club of ThailandI Have a Dream Foundation: $35,000 · OtherI Have a Dream FoundationEPIC DAY OF SERVICE FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 · OtherEPIC DAY OF SERVICE FOUNDATION INCCameroon Wash Bank of Kumbo: $22,837 · OtherCameroon Wash Bank of KumboCOLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherCOLORADO DREAM FOUNDATIONComeback Yoga: $11,000 · OtherBags of Fun: $9,300 · Other+3 more: $18,290 · Other+3 moreGLOBAL DENTAL RELIEF: $56,436 · Recreation & SportsGLOBAL DENTAL R…ROCKY MOUNTAIN RYLA INC: $46,700 · Youth DevelopmentROCKY MOUNTAI…GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $6,000 · Human ServicesMental Health Center of Denver: $13,180 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $10,000 · HealthFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $9,260 · Food & NutritionCROSSPURPOSE: $7,580 · Community Improvement
Other$237,285Recreation & Sports$56,436Youth Development$46,700Human Services$26,000Health$23,180Food & Nutrition$9,260Community Improvement$7,580

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL DENTAL RELIEF: $56,436 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN RYLA INC: $46,700 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMental Health Center of Denver: $13,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $9,260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSPURPOSE: $7,580 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL DENTAL RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN RYLA INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health Center of Denver ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Denver Broncos FoundationCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Denver Broncos Foundation · Caring for Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary Club of Denver Se Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary Club of Denver Se Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary Club of Denver Se’s filings →

    More from the funding graph