Skip to content
Rossmoor Rotary Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rossmoor Rotary Foundation

Contributions to local, regional, and international charitable activities, improvements in the local rossmoor retirement community

$163k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$356kEducation$96kHuman Services$58kFood & Nutrition$33kInternational$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$14k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $117,560, the rows itemized in this filing. The $162,870 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $45,310 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $94k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARKINSONS NETWORK MT DIABLO$48,000
ROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$14,000
SHELTERBOX USA$11,560
CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY$10,000
LAMORINDA RESPITE CENTER$10,000
HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY$8,000
CURE ALZHEIMERS FUND$8,000
MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Hope Hospice: $8k → 10%Meals on Wheels: $10k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $8k → 9%Meals on WheelsSr Outreach: $7k → 9%Hospice of the East Bay: $9k → 9%Hospice of the East Bay: $8k → 9%HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$530k · 10 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$530k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+55%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PN
    PARKINSON NETWORK OF MT DIABLO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $206k · revenue +71% · 62% of their budget
  • RS
    Rossmoor Scholarship Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue ×11
  • CI
    CHOICE IN AGING
    4× · 2019–2024 · $36k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +55%
  • HH
    HOPE HOSPICE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Direct Relief

Direct relief is a humanitarian aid organization, active in all 50 states and more than 80 countries, with a mission to improve the health and lives of people affected by poverty or emergencies - without regard to politics, religion, or…

International
2
Family Caregiver Alliance

To support and assist caregivers of adults with chronic diseases and conditions through education, services, research and advocacy.

Health
3
Alzheimers Research Association
—
4
Rossmoor Fund

To assist Rossmoor Residents in financial need. Develop and fund charitable and education programs for the Rossmoor Community Residents.

Human Services
5
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
6
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
7
Project Angel Food

Project angel food (the organization) improves health and fights food insecurity for critically ill individuals in los angeles county through its medically tailored meal program and nutrition counseling. for over 35 years, they have served…

Health
8
Alzheimer's Impact Movement

To advance and develop policies to overcome alzheimer's and all other dementia through increased investment in research, enhanced care and improved support.

Health
9
Donate Life California

Donate Life Californa is a nonprofit organ and tissue donor registry dedicated to saving the lives of thousands of Californians awaiting life-saving transplants. The registry is used by the states organ and tissue recovery organizations.

Health
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
Disability Rights California

Drc works in partnership with disabled people to defend rights, advance opportunities, grow power, and expand public support for disability justice in california and beyond.

Civil Rights
12
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels Diablo Region. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARKINSON NETWORK OF MT DIABLO: $206,041 · HealthPARKINSON NETWORK OF MT DIABLOCHOICE IN AGING: $36,000 · HealthCHOICE IN AGINGALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $26,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATIONALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INCCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY San Francisco Bay Area: $20,000 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY San Francisco Bay AreaRossmoor Scholarship Foundation: $96,000 · EducationRossmoor Scholarsh…EAST BAY INTEGRATED CARE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesEAST BAY INTE…MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $25,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEE…SHELTERBOX USA INC: $11,560 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX US…HOPE HOSPICE INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOSPICE …HOLY SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH: $56,250 · OtherHOLY SHEPH…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $24,500 · InternationalLAKE AREA ROTARY CLUB ASSOCIATION: $14,282 · Community ImprovementFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $8,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$313,041Education$96,000Human Services$69,560Other$56,250International$24,500Community Improvement$14,282Food & Nutrition$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARKINSON NETWORK OF MT DIABLO: $206,041 over 9y, 62% of budgetRossmoor Scholarship Foundation: $96,000 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetCHOICE IN AGING: $36,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEAST BAY INTEGRATED CARE INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $24,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY San Francisco Bay Area: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAKE AREA ROTARY CLUB ASSOCIATION: $14,282 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOSPICE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community Fo…John Muir HealthShell USA Company Fou…The Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
East Bay Community FoundationCA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · John Muir Health · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rossmoor Rotary Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rossmoor Rotary Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rossmoor Rotary Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rossmoor Rotary Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rossmoor Rotary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home