Skip to content
Rose Giving Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rose Giving Inc

ROSE stands for Reach Out * Serve * EmpowerWe are a group of highly motivated, caring, TPC Twin Cities women members who share a commitment to make a difference in our community.

$118k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$163kHuman Services$161kFood & Nutrition$141kHousing & Shelter$140kArts & Culture$110kEducation$14kRecreation & Sports$1k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $110,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $118,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$110,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$93k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lyric Arts Company of Anoka$110,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $303k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NACE: $1k → 7%Safe Families for Children: $160k → 14%Lee Carlson Center for Mental Health and Wellbeing: $1k → 7%Lee Carlson Center for Mental Health and Wellbeing: $1k → 7%Hope for Community: $140k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

2%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16k · 3 repeat orgs$714k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$16k
$604k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+42%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLAINE COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP ASSOC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +7%
  • SL
    Spring Lake Park Lions School District #16 Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +37%
  • LC
    LEE CARLSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH & WELL-BEING
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue -39%

Funded once

  • GL
    Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $160k · revenue +42%
  • SF
    SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $160k · revenue +171%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR THE COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2021 · $140k · revenue -2% · 36% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lonsdale Area Food Shelf Inc

Provide emergency food relief for the families in the Lonsdale MN region .

Food & Nutrition
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
North Scott Food Pantry

The North Scott Food Pantry provides food for people in need. Clients receive enough food for about one week and are allowed to get food every 28 days. There were 721 visits to our food pantry in 2025.

Food & Nutrition
4
Nexus-Path Family Healing

Strengthening lives, families, and communities through our cornerstone values.

Human Services
5
Northern Pines Mental Health Center

Providing direct and indirect services in the areas of mental health, developmental disabilites, and substance use to residents of aitkin, cass, crow wing, morrison, todd, and wadena counties.

Health
6
Northwood Children's Home Society Inc

Northwood children's home society, inc. is a not-for-profit, multi- service agency that provides professional care, education, and treatment for boys and girls with emotional, behavioral, and learning disabilities.

Human Services
7
North Lake Wellness Center
—
8
Care in Action Minnesota

Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, strengthen families and prevent childhood maltreatment, by providing timely crucial support that meets the basic needs of local families and…

Human Services
9
Chinese Community Center
Community Improvement
10
Prairie Pines Childcare Center

Provide quality childcare services at a central facility in the fosston, mn community. childcare is desperately needed in our area.

Human Services
11
Little Sprouts Learning Center Inc Wersal

Little sprouts learning center is an educationally based child care facility located in sleepy eye, mn that strives to serve the child and family in a safe and nurturing environment.

Education
12
Fairview Health Services

Mission: Fairview is driven to heal, discover and educate for longer, healthier lives. Vision: Fairview is driving a healthier future. Values: Dignity: We value the uniqueness of each person and work to ensure everyone's right to privacy.…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lee Carlson Center for Mental Health & Well-Being; the most unlike its peers is Spring Lake Park Lions School District #16 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $160,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCEHOPE FOR THE COMMUNITY: $140,000 · Human ServicesHOPE FOR THE COMMUNITY+2 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $160,250 · HealthGundersen Lutheran Medic…HOPE 4 Youth: $140,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE 4 YouthLYRIC ARTS COMPANY OF ANOKA INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureLYRIC ARTS COMPAN…BLAINE COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP ASSOC: $7,000 · OtherSpring Lake Park Lions School District #16 Foundation: $7,000 · OtherGRANNYS CLOSET: $1,000 · OtherNORTH METRO PEDIATRICS PA: $1,000 · OtherNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$303,000Health$160,250Youth Development$140,000Arts & Culture$110,000Other$16,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $160,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $160,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetHOPE FOR THE COMMUNITY: $140,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetLYRIC ARTS COMPANY OF ANOKA INC: $110,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetLEE CARLSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH & WELL-BEING: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Connexus Energy Found…Allina Health SystemOtto Bremer TrustMightycause Charitabl…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Connexus Energy FoundationMN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Connexus Energy Foundation · Allina Health System · Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rose Giving Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rose Giving Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rose Giving Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rose Giving Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rose Giving’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home