Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rose Francis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$241k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$660kArts & Culture$486kHealth$407kYouth Development$403kFood & Nutrition$295kPhilanthropy$140kHousing & Shelter$95kCommunity Improvement$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$50,000
WAY TO GROW$50,000
READY SET SMILE$35,000
CONSTELLATION FUND$25,000
WALKER ARTS CENTER$15,000
EMERGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$10,000
INSPIRE MSP$10,000
BANYAN COMMUNITY$10,000
ALLIANCE HOUSING$10,000
HOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT$10,000
ACLU FOUNDATION INC$5,000
PROJECT SUCCESS$5,000
YOUTH LINK FOOD SHELF$5,000
MINNEAPOLIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $660k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WAY TO GROW: $130k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $125k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $115k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $52k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $50k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $50k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $48k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $45k → 11%WAY TO GROW: $45k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
NY
OR
IA
CO
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 24 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
14

Total granted

$2.5M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+10%

Still filing today

88%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WAY TO GROW
    9× · 2017–2025 · $660k · revenue +41%
  • WA
    WALKER ART CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $349k · revenue +87%
  • RS
    READY SET SMILE PA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $311k · revenue +196%

Funded once

  • GT
    GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -6%
  • LO
    LEGACY OF DR JOSIE JOHNSON
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TA
    THE AJ BLAIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Breakthrough Twin Cities

Breakthrough Twin Cities supports students on their journey to college by fostering a community of mutual learning with the next generation of educators so they both can collaborate, grow, and thrive.

Education
2
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
3
Women's Foundation of Minnesota

Women's Foundation of Minnesota is a statewide community foundation investing in ending systemic inequities and driving innovation for gender and racial justice. WFM applies an Intersectional Equity Framework inclusive of gender, race,…

Philanthropy
4
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
5
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
6
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
7
Leadership Matters Mn

Leadership matters mn is focused on advancing a policy agenda that places working minnesotans first. we support economic growth, job creation and equitable tax and education policies that will allow every minnesotan to thrive.

Education
8
Youthprise

Youthprise is a nonprofit intermediary that invests in the future of Minnesota by investing in youth. Youthprise's mission is to increase equity with and for Minnesota's indigenous, low-income, and racially diverse youth.

Education
9
Minneapolis Climate Action

Minneapolis Climate Action is a 501c(3) nonprofit founded in 2007 by a group of dedicated individuals committed to addressing climate change in their community. After almost 10 years of working at the neighborhood level and piloting the…

Environment
10
Minnesota Women Lawyers

To advance the success of women attorneys and strive for a just society.

—
11
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability

The alliance is a coalition of community-based organizations and advocacy groups with a mission to build power across the intersections of geography, race, culture, and issues in the twin cities region to eliminate systems of oppression…

Community Improvement
12
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Aj Blain Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAY TO GROW: $659,500 · Human ServicesWAY TO GROWWALKER ART CENTER: $349,226 · Arts & CultureWALKER ART CENTERHighpoint Center for Printmaking: $33,103 · Arts & CultureHighpoint Center fo…INSPIREMSP: $25,000 · Arts & CultureINSPIREMSPGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureGUTHRIE THEATER FOU…+3 more: $6,300 · Arts & CultureREADY SET SMILE PA: $311,166 · HealthREADY SET SMI…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $277,570 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVE…The Cookie Cart: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Cookie…HOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOSPITALIT…JUXTAPOSITION ARTS INC: $46,299 · Youth DevelopmentJUXTAPOSIT…The Banyan Foundation: $180,000 · Community ImprovementThe Banya…BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE: $41,000 · Community ImprovementBEACON IN…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL…EMERGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $42,500 · OtherEMERGE COMMUNITY DE…PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $20,000 · OtherALLIANCE HOUSING: $17,000 · OtherThe Constellation Fund: $135,000 · OtherThe Constellation F…PROJECT SUCCESS: $23,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $15,551 · OtherALLIANCE HOUSING INC: $37,000 · OtherALLIANCE HOUSING IN…NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $20,000 · Other+15 more: $80,332 · Other+15 more
Human Services$659,500Arts & Culture$438,629Health$312,166Food & Nutrition$277,570Youth Development$246,299Community Improvement$221,000Other$450,383

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAY TO GROW: $659,500 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetWALKER ART CENTER: $349,226 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetREADY SET SMILE PA: $311,166 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $277,570 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Banyan Foundation: $180,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetThe Constellation Fund: $135,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetThe Cookie Cart: $110,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $90,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetJUXTAPOSITION ARTS INC: $46,299 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetEMERGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $42,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE: $41,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE HOUSING INC: $37,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHighpoint Center for Printmaking: $33,103 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetINSPIREMSP: $25,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT SUCCESS: $23,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $15,551 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $14,182 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Farm and Market Project: $12,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AJ BLAIN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetGREEN CITIES ACCORD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE THIRD RAIL: $2,300 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetThe Art Base: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMinnesota Humanities Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMinneapolis Parks Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA CITIZENS FOR THE ARTS INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAY TO GROW ↗
  • Who funds WALKER ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds READY SET SMILE PA ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds The Banyan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Constellation Fund ↗
  • Who funds The Cookie Cart ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds JUXTAPOSITION ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds Highpoint Center for Printmaking ↗
  • Who funds INSPIREMSP ↗
  • Who funds GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SUCCESS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds Youth Farm and Market Project ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AJ BLAIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREEN CITIES ACCORD ↗
  • Who funds THE THIRD RAIL ↗
  • Who funds The Art Base ↗
  • Who funds MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WATCH ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Humanities Center ↗
  • Who funds Minneapolis Parks Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA CITIZENS FOR THE ARTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN35.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The McKnight Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Mortenson Family Foundation · Minnesota Community Foundation · Target Foundation · Smikis Foundation · Frey Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rose Francis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rose Francis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rose Francis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph