Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Roripaugh Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$258kArts & Culture$153kHuman Services$58kEnvironment$54kFood & Nutrition$30kCommunity Improvement$20kCrime & Legal$19kHealth$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
$1,333
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMECULA DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$24,000
SANTA ROSA PLATEAU FOUNDATION$10,000
DORLAND MOUNTAIN ARTS COLONY INC$9,560
TEMECULA VALLEY WRITERS ILLUSTRATORS INC$9,560
WOMEN ORGANIZING WOMEN INC$7,000
ACCESSITY$5,000
INLAND VALLEY SYMPHONY$4,000
PEARL CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS INC$4,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA I$2,133
KETTLE FALLS COMMUNITY CHEST$2,133
MAT-SU PICKLEBALL CLUB$2,133
RESERVOIR CHURCH$1,333
ALASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,238
ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEY INC$1,133
MAKE MUSIC RIGHT$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESOURCES FOR INFANT EDUCARERS: $4k → 14%TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND: $2k → 13%RESOURCES FOR INFANT EDUCARERS: $2k → 14%TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND: $2k → 13%RESOURCES FOR INFANT EDUCARERS: $1k → 14%SU REFUGIO MINISTRIES: $311 → 11%ROSE AGAIN FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%SAFE ALTERNATIVES FOR EVERYONE: $15k → 11%GREEN ACRES INTERACTIVE THERAPY: $663 → 11%HEMET HOSPICE VOLUNTEERS INC: $800 → 11%HEMET HOSPICE VOLUNTEERS INC: $1k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEYS: $4k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEYS: $3k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEYS: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
MA
CA
CO
VA
AR
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Roripaugh Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 87% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Roripaugh Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$528k · 34 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
29

Total granted

$528k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+20%

Still filing today

59%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationScience & TechHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    DORLAND MOUNTAIN ARTS COLONY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $105k · revenue +90% · 29% of their budget
  • SR
    Santa Rosa Plateau Foundation
    5× · 2018–2025 · $46k · revenue +39%
  • TT
    THINK TOGETHER
    3× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +344%

Funded once

  • SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $22k · revenue +20%
  • SF
    SAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +142%
  • RD
    RANCHO DAMACITAS CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter
2
Valley Humane SocietyInc

Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…

Animals
3
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
4
Pajaro Valley Shelter Services

Pajaro Valley Shelter Services provides families with a path toward self-sufficient futures through short-and longer-term housing and supportive services.

Human Services
5
Tri-Valley Haven for Women

Tri-Valley Haven for Women provides emergency shelter and services for survivors and their children who are victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, homelessness, and poverty. Tri-Valley offers a variety of supplemental services…

6
South Pacific County Humane Society

Our mission is to improve the lives of cats and dogs by providing compassionate care, finding homes for homeless animals, and supporting pets and pet owners in need. We accomplish this mission by taking cats and dogs that do not have a…

Animals
7
Humane Society of the Sierra Foothills

To prevent animal abuse and neglect, enforce the anti-cruelty laws of the State of California and promote the wellbeing of animals.

Animals
8
Animal Rescue of Anderson Valley

We are committed to caring for homeless cats and dogs and establishing a no kill community for cats and dogs in Mendocino County, and educating their owners as well as the general populace. Our volunteers provide temporary shelter and…

Animals
9
Rogue Valley Humane Society

The Rogue Valley Humane Society provides compassionate care for stray unwanted displaced and abandoned animals and works toward ending pet overpopulation so that there will be no more homeless pets. We are committed to placing every…

Animals
10
Humane Society of Truckee-Tahoe

The Humane Society is dedicated to saving and improving the lives of pets through adoptions, community spay/neuter services and humane eduon programs.

Animals
11
Friends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter

We are dedicated to building a community responsible for pet stewardship and humane treatment of animals.

Animals
12
Shelter Care Resources

Shelter Care Resources provides basic necessities to low income, homeless and foster families. We operate a food pantry, a clothing and hygiene resource center, and help individuals who are homeless or at risk of homelessness.Our mission…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Great Northwest Hawaii Alaska Indiana and Kentucky and the most unlike its peers is Women Organizing Women Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Environmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesAnimal Rescue and ShelterChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Arts Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%9%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr13%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%4%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr11%25%35–55yr13%32%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/61
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,917

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/45
Grantees still filing
33/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $162,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INCThessalonika Family Services Inc — $20,000 · OtherThessalonika Family Services IncTEMECULA VALLEY WRITERS ILLUSTRATORS INC — $11,540 · Other+49 more — $134,853 · Other+49 moreDORLAND MOUNTAIN ARTS COLONY INC — $104,744 · Arts & CultureDORLAND MOUNTAIN ART…FRIENDS OF THE TEMECULA CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC — $7,400 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE TEMEC…TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM — $6,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $5,167 · Arts & CultureSanta Rosa Plateau Foundation — $45,984 · Science & TechSanta Rosa P…MIND EDUCATION — $28,000 · Science & TechMIND EDUCATI…THINK TOGETHER — $30,000 · EducationTHINK TOGE…SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $22,000 · EducationSCHOLARSHI…JDS CREATIVE ACADEMY — $7,400 · EducationJDS CREATI…SAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS — $15,300 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE VALLEYS SC INC — $9,970 · Human ServicesRose Again Foundation — $7,400 · Human ServicesResources for Infant Educarers — $6,694 · Human ServicesTRI COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND HOPE STREET PROJECT — $4,484 · Human ServicesHEMET HOSPICE VOLUNTEERS INC — $1,912 · Human Services+2 more — $974 · Human ServicesACCESSITY — $20,000 · Community ImprovementVOICES FOR CHILDREN — $18,000 · Civil Rights
Other$328,393Arts & Culture$123,311Science & Tech$73,984Education$59,400Human Services$46,734Community Improvement$20,000Civil Rights$18,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDORLAND MOUNTAIN ARTS COLONY INC — $104,744 over 8y, 29% of budgetSanta Rosa Plateau Foundation — $45,984 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetTHINK TOGETHER — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIND EDUCATION — $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $22,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThessalonika Family Services Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetACCESSITY — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN — $18,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS — $15,300 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHWEST COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE VALLEYS SC INC — $9,970 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRose Again Foundation — $7,400 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE TEMECULA CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC — $7,400 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetJDS CREATIVE ACADEMY — $7,400 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetResources for Infant Educarers — $6,694 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetValley Restart Shelter Inc — $6,268 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM — $6,000 over 1y, 90% of budgetREACH THE VALLEY — $4,800 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLECTIVE HERITAGE INSTITUTE — $4,440 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINLAND VALLEY SYMPHONY — $4,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLAMPASAS MISSION — $3,293 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetRAMONA HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $2,868 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHumanist Mutual Aid Network — $2,552 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEMET HOSPICE VOLUNTEERS INC — $1,912 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFriends of the Palmer Public Library Inc — $1,816 over 2y, 15% of budgetTINY HOPE VILLAGE — $1,368 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVolunteer Food & Resource Center — $1,238 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEYS INC — $1,133 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE AFRICA INC DBA GOGO GRANDMOTHERS — $866 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN ACRES INTERACTIVE THERAPY INC — $663 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMatsu Ski Club — $415 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $414 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION — $340 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSU REFUGIO MINISTRIES — $311 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF AUSTIN ANIMAL CENTER — $223 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE TEMECULA LIBRARIES — $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DORLAND MOUNTAIN ARTS COLONY INC
  • Who funds Santa Rosa Plateau Foundation
  • Who funds THINK TOGETHER
  • Who funds MIND EDUCATION
  • Who funds SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC
  • Who funds Thessalonika Family Services Inc
  • Who funds ACCESSITY
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds SAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHWEST COUNTY
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE VALLEYS SC INC
  • Who funds Rose Again Foundation
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE TEMECULA CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds JDS CREATIVE ACADEMY
  • Who funds WOMEN ORGANIZING WOMEN INC
  • Who funds Resources for Infant Educarers
  • Who funds Valley Restart Shelter Inc
  • Who funds TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM
  • Who funds REACH THE VALLEY
  • Who funds TRI COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND HOPE STREET PROJECT
  • Who funds COLLECTIVE HERITAGE INSTITUTE
  • Who funds INLAND VALLEY SYMPHONY
  • Who funds LAMPASAS MISSION
  • Who funds RAMONA HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Humanist Mutual Aid Network

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Community FoundationCA34.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Miter Charitable Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians · California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Roripaugh Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Roripaugh Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Roripaugh Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph