Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roost Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$144kHealth$113kHuman Services$63kRecreation & Sports$33kAnimals$33kPhilanthropy$30kMembership Benefit$15kArts & Culture$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$443k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITY$50,000
ST JOHN'S CEMETARY ASSOCIATION$15,000
BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITY POINT HEALTH ST LUKES FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CRITTENTON CENTER: $6k → 13%GOSPEL MISSION: $10k → 13%GOSPEL MISSION: $10k → 13%GOSPEL MISSION: $5k → 13%GOSPEL MISSION: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$338k · 8 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$338k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+100%

Still filing today

63%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsInternationalEducationRecreation & SportsMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SIOUXLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $33k · revenue +41%
  • TC
    THE CRITTENTON CENTER
    2× · 2021–2023 · $16k · revenue +131%
  • OU
    OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED
    2× · 2021–2023 · $11k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • NS
    NORTH SOUND FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -78%
  • MR
    MISSOURI RIVER BOAT CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sioux City Lewis & Clark Association
Arts & Culture
2
Sioux Falls Environmental Access Inc
—
3
Sioux City Housing Trust Fund Inc

To act as the local governing board of sioux city housing trust fund by collecting and disbursing revenue for the purpose of encouraging the development and redevelopment of affordable housing for sioux city's income qualified residents.

Housing & Shelter
4
Siouxland Chamber of Commerce

Improve the quality of the siouxland area

—
5
Sioux City Jewish Cemetery Association

Cemetery care and maintenance

—
6
Siouxland Habitat for Humanity

To provide affordable housing for low-income families

—
7
Siouxland Community Health Foundation

The foundation provides support for community health. it helps eliminate barriers and improves the health of the community.

Health
8
St Francis House of Sioux Falls

Ecumenical not-for-profit transitional living facility for the homeless in sioux falls, south dakota. purpose is to offer hospitality, fellowship and support to those who have nowhere to sleep.

—
9
Saint Gabriel Communications Ltd

Operation of a radio station to service as a ministry

Religion
10
Sioux Center Christian School

Christian education grade school

Education
11
Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency

Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…

Human Services
12
Siouxland Senior Center

To enrich the quality of life and support independence and vitality for our members. this is done by meeting the social, recreational and educational needs of members, in an environment that is fun, safe, inclusive and courteous for all

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Siouxland Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is St John's Cemetery Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITY: $127,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS HOME OF SIOUX CITYBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $15,000 · OtherYELLOW DOG AUCTION CLUB: $11,000 · OtherOPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED: $11,000 · Other+8 more: $47,500 · Other+8 moreTHE GOSPEL MISSION: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE GOSPEL …THE CRITTENTON CENTER: $16,000 · Human ServicesTHE CRITTEN…SIOUXLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $32,500 · AnimalsSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropySt John's Cemetery Association: $15,000 · Membership BenefitNORTH SOUND FOUNDATION: $15,000 · InternationalBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationSIOUX CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$312,000Human Services$46,000Animals$32,500Philanthropy$30,000Membership Benefit$15,000International$15,000Education$10,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIOUXLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $32,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GOSPEL MISSION: $30,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CRITTENTON CENTER: $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSt John's Cemetery Association: $15,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetNORTH SOUND FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSIOUX CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIOUXLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE CRITTENTON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds St John's Cemetery Association ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SOUND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED ↗
  • Who funds BRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HEALTH FOUNDATION OF SIOUX CITY IOWA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Waitt FoundationSD20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Waitt Foundation · Siouxland Community Foundation · Missouri River Historical Development Inc · The Roth & Letch Family Charitable Foundation · The Chesterman Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roost Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roost Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Roost Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Roost Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roost Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph