Loading…
· Public charity
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARTIES OF NORTHEASTERN PENSYLVANIA INC
To provide contributions and financial support to local rmhs and charities benefiting children
$455k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants
1
Communities
$208k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Health$878kHuman Services$566kCrime & Legal$30kYouth Development$22kPhilanthropy$20kOther$68k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
healthyvaluesincomesracesgoodkidsbuilding strong
2019
incomesraceskidshealthyvaluesvolunteersbuilding strong
2020
receivingcaremedical
2021
core operation
2022
core operation
2023
core operation
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k2 grants · $18k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $397k
$188,435
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DANVILLE$208,435
- RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF SCRANTON$188,435
- Wyoming Valley Children's Association$9,700
- FAMILY SERVICES ASSOC OF NORTHEASTERN PA$8,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 9 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
9
4
Total granted
$1.5M
$57k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
0%
+58%
Still filing today
89%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +89%
- GSGREATER SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY YMCA3× · 2017–2019 · $28k · revenue +93%
- EFEAGLE FOUNDATION OF BLUE MTN SD3× · 2017–2019 · $22k · revenue +273%
Funded once
- SHSUSQUEHANNA HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $27k
- UWUNITED WAY OF SUSQUEHANNA COUNTYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +85%
- AMA MOMENT OF MAGICgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +58%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Upper Valley Child Advocacy Center
To meet the needs of children and families in our community by providing a child focused center that is dedicated to healing, understanding and belief by using a collaborative approach to the identification, prevention, investigation,…
Crime & Legal
2
Ronald McDonald House Charities of
Rmhc of western montana was built on the simple idea that nothing else should matter when a family is focused on the health of children. we are warm beds, hot showers, nutritious meals, laundry facilities, play areas and most importantly,…
Health
3
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of the
See schedule o. ronald mcdonald house charities (rmhc) of the philadelphia region supports families on their children's medical journeys with a community of comfort and hope. we envision a world where every family can focus on their…
—
4
Young Mens Christian Association of Sewickley Valley
The mission of the sewickley valley ymca is to build a healthy spirit, mind, and body based on christian principles and to improve the quality of life for children, individuals, and families in the quaker valley, moon area, cornell and…
—
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc
Ronald McDonald House Charities (RMHC) of the Intermountain Area surrounds families with the support they need to be near and care for their seriously ill or injured children.
Health
6
The Young Men's Christian Association of
The young men's christian association of delaware county d/b/a the community ymca of eastern delaware county ("the community ymca or "the organization") was organized on december 14, 1948 under the laws of pennsylvania as a nonprofit…
Human Services
7
Valley Children's Medical Group
Provide high quality, comprehensive health services to children.
Health
8
Valley Children's Hospital
Provide high quality, comprehensive healthcare services to children
Health
9
Mesilla Valley Casa Inc
Mesilla valley casa was organized for the purpose of advocating for the best interests of abused and neglected children and supports the development, growth and continuation of programs which recruit and train volunteers to serve as court…
Civil Rights
10
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities
The primary exempt purpose is to provide comfort and care for families of children who must travel outside their own community to seek medical treatment in roanoke valley hospitals. the organization keeps families close by providing a…
Philanthropy
11
Ronald Mcdonald House of Central &
Provide a "home away from home" for the families of seriously ill children receiving care at medical facilities near their locations in new brunswick, neptune and long branch, new jersey.
—
12
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of
Rmhc-cp keeps families together while their child receives medical care. ronald mcdonald house charities of central pa is keeping families together in a comforting and safe environment while their children receive essential medical…
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Wyoming Valley and the most unlike its peers is The Eagle Foundation for the. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$878,085Human Services$565,835Other$68,200Crime & Legal$30,000Youth Development$22,014Philanthropy$20,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DANVILLE ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF SCRANTON ↗
- Who funds GREATER CARBONDALE YMCA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREATER SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY YMCA ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds SUSQUEHANNA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds EAGLE FOUNDATION OF BLUE MTN SD ↗
- Who funds Wyoming Valley Children's Association ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds A MOMENT OF MAGIC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Allone CharitiesPA22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Allone Charities · The Luzerne Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · Robert y Moffat Charitable Trust · The Tambur Family Foundation · Scranton Area Foundation Inc · Ppl Foundation · Benevento and Mayo Foundation · The Willary Foundation · Allone Foundation · United Way of Wyoming Valley · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARTIES OF NORTHEASTERN PENSYLVANIA INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DANVILLE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~6 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 232155803 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DANVILLE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 21% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Ronald McDonald House Charties of Northeastern Pensylvania Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ronald McDonald House Charties of Northeastern Pensylvania Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines