Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ronald and Kelly Lockton Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$339k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$723kArts & Culture$53kCrime & Legal$43kEnvironment$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kHousing & Shelter$11kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $221k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STAND TOGETHER TRUST$150,000
THE ELLIS FOUNDATION$71,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN KANSAS$25,000
THE ARMITAGE FOUNDATION$25,000
THE NELSON-ATKINS MUSEUM OF ART$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ONE805 INC$11,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY VAIL VALLEY$11,000
JACKSON COUNTY CASA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ONE805 INC: $12k → 14%THE ARMITAGE FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%RAREKC: $3k → 5%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN KANSAS: $25k → 11%THE KU ENDOWMENT: $250k → 15%THE ELLIS FOUNDATION: $71k → 19%THE NELSON-ATKINS MUSEUM OF ART: $20k → 15%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY VAIL VALLEY: $11k → 7%ACE SCHOLARSHIPS KANSAS: $15k → 8%STAND TOGETHER TRUST: $150k → 7%SYMPHONY IN THE FLINT HILLS: $8k → 11%THE KU ENDOWMENT: $250k → 15%ELLIS FOUNDATION: $2k → 19%BATTLE FROM WITHIN INC: $1k → 15%COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES: $13k → 15%COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES: $10k → 15%COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES: $10k → 15%JACKSON COUNTY CASA: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$606k · 3 repeat orgs$254k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against -109% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$606k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
-109%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’24
EducationPublic Safety & DisasterCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TK
    THE KU ENDOWMENT
    2× · 2021–2022 · $500k
  • TE
    THE ELLIS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2024 · $73k · revenue +66%
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $33k

Funded once

  • SI
    Symphony in the Flint Hills Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -109%
  • R
    RAREKC
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • BF
    BATTLE FROM WITHIN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Flint Hills Counterpoint Inc
Arts & Culture
2
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
3
Sageland Collaborative

To provide science-based strategies for wildlife and land conservation.

Environment
4
Audubon of Kansas Inc

To promote the enjoyment, understanding, protection, and restoration of natural ecosystems; and to establish a culture of conservation and an environmental ethic.

Environment
5
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
6
The Serengeti Foundation
Environment
7
The Fauna Foundation
—
8
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
9
Sedona Symphony

The Sedona Symphony is committed to enriching the quality of life of our Northern Arizona community through the power of live orchestral music that educates, entertains, and inspires. From timeless classics to bold contemporary works, the…

Arts & Culture
10
First Light Foundation

First Light Foundation makes films about environmental issues that rely on public support since they lack sufficient commercial value to interest commercial film producers.

Arts & Culture
11
Sierra Nevada Alliance

To protect and restore sierra lands, water, wildlife and rural communities. to engage and support efforts to adopt exemplary local sustainable community actions accross the sierra nevada that balance social, economic and environmental…

Environment
12
Sequoia Forestkeeper

To protect and restore the ecosystem of the southern sierra nevada - including both the sequoia national forest and the giant sequoia monument - through monitoring, enforcement, litigation, and public awareness.by acting as the eyes, ears,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity Vail Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Armitage Foundation Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE KU ENDOWMENT: $500,000 · OtherTHE KU ENDOWMENTCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES: $32,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 · OtherTHE ARMITAGE FOUNDATION LTD: $25,000 · Other+6 more: $57,000 · Other+6 moreTHE SEMINAR NETWORK INC: $150,000 · EducationTHE SEMINAR NETWORK…THE ELLIS FOUNDATION: $73,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ELLIS…ONE805 INC: $11,500 · Public Safety & DisasterJACKSON COUNTY CASA: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$639,500Education$150,000Philanthropy$73,000Public Safety & Disaster$11,500Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SEMINAR NETWORK INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELLIS FOUNDATION: $73,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARMITAGE FOUNDATION LTD: $25,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetONE805 INC: $11,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY VAIL VALLEY INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY CASA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSymphony in the Flint Hills Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lockton Family FoundationMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lockton Family Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ronald and Kelly Lockton Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ronald and Kelly Lockton Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ronald and Kelly Lockton Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ronald and Kelly Lockton Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ronald and Kelly Lockton Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph