Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rolfs Educational Foundation Ltd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$894kReligion$1k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $83k
$9,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UW MADISON$49,500
UNIVERSITY OF MN TWIN CITIES$18,000
UW MILWAUKEE$15,000
UW GREEN BAY$9,000
ST NORBERT UNIVERSITY$4,500
UW OSHKOSH$4,500
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY$4,500
WEST BEND SCHOOL DISTRICT$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MN TWIN CITIES: $18k → 11%CONCORDIA UNIV: $5k → 6%WEST BEND SCHOOL DISTRICT: $4k → 6%UW GREEN BAY: $9k → 10%UW WHITEWATER: $5k → 10%UW MADISON: $50k → 10%UW LACROSSE: $16k → 12%AMAMDA RICE & UWM WASHINGTON COUNTY: $1k → 17%MOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $5k → 11%UW OSHKOSH: $5k → 6%UW GREEN BAY: $9k → 10%ST NORBERT UNIVERSITY: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
WI
MI
SD
OH
NE
MO
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$646k · 23 repeat orgs$249k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
37

Total granted

$646k
$240k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+10%

Still filing today

39%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $19k · revenue +2%
  • ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $19k · revenue +8%
  • ALVERNO COLLEGE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $14k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Mount Saint Mary's University Inc

As a catholic university, mount st. mary's graduates ethical leaders who are inspired by a passion for learning and lead lives of significance in service to god and others.

Education
3
Saint Martin's University

Saint martin's students learn to make a positive difference in their lives and in the lives of others through the interaction of faith, reason, and service. the university honors both the sacredness of the individual and the significance…

Education
4
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
5
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
6
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
7
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
8
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
9
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
10
Lourdes University

Lourdes university, rooted in catholic and franciscan traditions, provides a values-centered education that enriches lives and advances academic excellence through the integration of the liberal arts and professional studies.

Education
11
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
12
St Ambrose University

Mission statement: an inclusive, catholic, and diocesan community of learners, st. ambrose university empowers all ambrosians to act courageously, to seek wisdom through faith and reason, to work for justice, and to lead lives of service.…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mount Marty University; the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UW MADISON: $171,000 · OtherUW MADISONUW MILWAUKEE: $81,500 · OtherUW MILWAUKEEUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $60,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISONUW LACROSSE: $41,000 · OtherUW GREEN BAY: $36,000 · OtherMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $36,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $27,000 · Other+46 more: $324,982 · Other+46 moreASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $22,500 · EducationASHLAND UNIVER…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $22,500 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIV…ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $18,500 · EducationST NORBERT COL…ALVERNO COLLEGE: $14,000 · EducationALVERNO COLLEG…MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $12,500 · EducationMILWAUKEE SCHO…MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY: $11,250 · EducationMOUNT MARTY UN…CARTHAGE COLLEGE: $7,000 · EducationCARTHAGE COLLE…Marquette University: $5,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · Education
Other$777,482Education$117,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC: $18,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $18,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALVERNO COLLEGE: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY: $11,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARTHAGE COLLEGE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALVERNO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CARTHAGE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rolfs Educational Foundation Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rolfs Educational Foundation Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rolfs Educational Foundation Ltd?

    Find your warmest path to Rolfs Educational Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rolfs Educational Foundation Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph