Skip to content
Roland G Labonte and Marilyn Bianca Labonte Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Roland G Labonte and Marilyn Bianca Labonte Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$187kHealth$34kEducation$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kHuman Services$8kPublic Benefit$3kAnimals$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$363k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADMIRAL'S COVE FOUNDATION$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$7,500
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS$2,000
THE CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 14%THE CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $1k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 11%WINNERS CIRCLE CHARITIES: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MO
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$217k · 6 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
22

Total granted

$217k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+29%

Still filing today

67%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $57k · revenue +110%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +40%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2022–2025 · $10k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • HW
    HEART WARRIOR ACHIEVEMENT SCHOLARSHIP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +33%
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
3
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
4
Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc

JMCPG is committed to providing compassionate, personalized care from the region's most trusted team of physicians and health care professionals. Across the Palm Beaches and the Treasure Coast of Florida, JMCPG practice locations offer…

Health
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
6
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc

The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.

Health
7
Shands Jacksonville Healthcare Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
8
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
9
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
10
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
11
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Inc

To promote and support moffitt subsidiaries through research, management, and other means of support.

Health
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Winners Circle Charities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AFOOFA INC: $130,000 · PhilanthropyAFOOFA INCADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC: $56,500 · PhilanthropyADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Inc: $15,000 · HealthJupiter Med…CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · HealthCONNECTICUT…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHI…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,000 · HealthDana-Farber…PIPERS ANGELS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · HealthELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $300 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR: $3,500 · OtherCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2,500 · OtherDANA-FARBER INC: $2,000 · OtherPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $2,000 · OtherUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $1,700 · OtherTHE BADGE ADMIRALS COVE GOLF TOURNAMENT: $1,000 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FUND: $1,000 · OtherSAFE AT HOME: $1,000 · OtherFLORIDA DISASTER RELIEF FUND: $1,000 · Other+4 more: $1,900 · OtherHEART WARRIOR ACHIEVEMENT SCHOLARSHIP INC: $10,000 · EducationPOTSDAM COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWINNERS CIRCLE CHARITIES INC: $500 · Human ServicesPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $2,000 · Public BenefitAmirah Inc: $750 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$191,500Health$25,300Other$17,600Education$12,000Human Services$11,500Public Benefit$2,000Crime & Legal$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC: $56,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART WARRIOR ACHIEVEMENT SCHOLARSHIP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOTSDAM COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $1,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPIPERS ANGELS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmirah Inc: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINNERS CIRCLE CHARITIES INC: $500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPeggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY11.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roland G Labonte and Marilyn Bianca Labonte Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roland G Labonte and Marilyn Bianca Labonte Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roland G Labonte and Marilyn Bianca Labonte Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home