Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Roger and Sheron O'Connell Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Philanthropy$1.2MEducation$45kHealth$38kHuman Services$6kEmployment$4kHousing & Shelter$4kArts & Culture$3kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,151,174
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROGER AND SHERON O'CONNELL DAF$1,151,174
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $2k → 14%EMBRACE SERVICES INC: $2k → 13%MARTHAS VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $2k → 11%MARTHAS VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $2k → 11%SWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $2k → 7%SWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $2k → 7%SWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $1k → 7%MARYS PLACE SEATTLE: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$217k · 19 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$217k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+234%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $13k · revenue +98%
  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +94%
  • SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $8k · revenue +400%

Funded once

  • SU
    STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +234%
  • ES
    EMBRACE SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +14%
  • MM
    MEREDITH MATHEWS EAST MADISON BRANCH OF THE YMC
    one grant, 2018 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spruce Street School

Spruce Street School is a nurturing educational community that instills in a broad range of children the social, emotional, and intellectual skills for lifelong participation in a diverse society. We offer kindergarten through fifth grade…

Education
2
Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services
3
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
4
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

5
Southwest Behavioral Health Services Inc

We inspire people to feel better and reach their potential. through helping people discover their strengths, we improve our communities.

Health
6
Seattle Country Day School

Seattle country day school is an independent, coeducational school serving kindergarten through eighth grade, inspiring gifted children to reach their potential through inquiry, curiosity, and wonder.

Education
7
Seattle Roots Community Health

To improve the health of our community by providing high quality, caring, culturally appropriate primary health care that addresses the needs of people, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
8
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
9
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
10
Swedish Edmonds

Swedish edmonds is part of swedish health services, a healthcare system committed to meeting the health-care needs of snohomish county.

Health
11
Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital

Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital (LSCH), established in 2005, provides acute and critical care in Vancouver, with 165 licensed beds. LSCH operates adult, pediatric, and OB/GYN hospitalist programs, as well as four primary care physician…

Health
12
Seattle Children's Healthcare System

Seattle children's healthcare system (schs) is engaged in activities relating to the provision of health care services to infants, children, and adolescents, delivering and improving the delivery and the quality of those services through…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mary's Place Seattle and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROGER AND SHERON O'CONNELL DAF — $1,151,174 · OtherROGER AND SHERON O'CONNELL DAFIndividual grant recipient — $113,689 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+8 more — $49,916 · OtherST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $13,000 · HealthEisenhower Medical Center — $8,000 · HealthSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $8,000 · HealthSWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesEMBRACE SERVICES INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE — $1,667 · Human ServicesSeattle Amistad School — $4,000 · EducationGreen Dot Public Schools National — $3,000 · EducationCOYOTE CENTRAL — $1,917 · EducationCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC — $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC — $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,314,779Health$29,000Human Services$14,167Education$8,917Youth Development$4,000Arts & Culture$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $13,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Amistad School — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGreen Dot Public Schools National — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRACE SERVICES INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOYOTE CENTRAL — $1,917 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE — $1,667 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center
  • Who funds SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds Seattle Amistad School
  • Who funds CAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC
  • Who funds Green Dot Public Schools National
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC
  • Who funds STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC
  • Who funds EMBRACE SERVICES INC
  • Who funds COYOTE CENTRAL
  • Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY13.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Roger and Sheron O'Connell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Roger and Sheron O'Connell Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Roger and Sheron O'Connell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph