Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Roetzel & Andress Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$147k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20222025.

Philanthropy$48kHuman Services$40kHealth$35kEducation$31kHousing & Shelter$10kRecreation & Sports$5kCommunity Improvement$5kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$89k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$4,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAYHOUSE SQUARE$50,000
LIVING WELL MISSIO INC$25,000
GRAND PRAIRIE SERVICES$15,000
OHIO WOMEN'S BAR FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITED METHODIST HOMES & SERVICES$10,000
ZELIES HOME$10,000
COLUMBUS METROPOLITAN CLUB$5,200
THE NEW ALBANY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,250
DELAWARE COUNTRY FOUNDATION$4,200
CORNERSTONE OF HOPE$3,500
THE PERRYSBURG ROTARY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TOLEDO$2,500
ECHOES OF POLAND FOLK SONG & DANCE ENSEMBLE$2,500
HELPING HAND CENTER$1,000
THE GRACE NETWORK$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GRAND PRAIRIE SERVICES: $15k → 14%GRAND PRAIRIE SERVICES: $10k → 14%GRAND PRAIRIE SERVICES: $250 → 14%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $4k → 17%UNITED METHODIST HOMES & SERVICES: $10k → 14%HELPING HAND CENTER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$96k · 5 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$96k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+42%

Still filing today

100%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COMMUNITY OF BEONAIR PROFESSIONALS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +8% · 47% of their budget
  • GP
    GRAND PRAIRIE SERVICES LLC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +4%
  • TM
    THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • UF
    UMH&S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CM
    CHICAGO METHODIST SENIOR SERVICES
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • NB
    NATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

2
Greater Cleveland Food Bank Inc

Working together to ensure everyone in our communities has the nutritious food they need every day.

Food & Nutrition
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
Ohio State Bar Association

The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.

5
Ohio Chamber of Commerce

As the state's leading business advocate and resource, the ohio chamber of commerce aggressively champions free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all ohioans.

6
Ohio Bankers League

Provide comprehensive services that benefit the financial institution industry in ohio.

Community Improvement
7
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
8
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

9
Greater Owensboro Chamber of Commerce Inc

Providing leadership, advocacy and member services that foster growth and economic prosperity for our region.

10
Ohio Business Roundtable

To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.

11
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
12
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Hand Center and the most unlike its peers is Living Well Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%24%<5yr14%5%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr15%33%35–55yr18%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%37%<5yr14%5%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr15%28%35–55yr18%21%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 24% of your grantees by number, and just 37% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
15%
8,588/59,176

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLAYHOUSE SQUARE — $50,000 · OtherPLAYHOUSE SQUAREUMH&S FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherUMH&S FOUNDATIONCHICAGO METHODIST SENIOR SERVICES — $10,000 · OtherCHICAGO METHODIST SENIOR SERVICESNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION — $5,000 · OtherTeam NEO Foundation — $5,000 · Other+10 more — $15,150 · Other+10 moreUNITED WAY OF SUMMIT AND MEDINA — $30,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SUMMIT…OHIO WOMENS BAR FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyOHIO WOMENS BAR FOUN…THE NEW ALBANY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,250 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW ALBANY COMMU…DELAWARE COUNTY FOUNDATION — $4,200 · PhilanthropyDELAWARE COUNTY FOUN…GRAND PRAIRIE SERVICES LLC — $25,250 · Human ServicesGRAND PRAIRIE SER…UNITED METHODIST HOMES & SERVICES — $10,000 · Human ServicesUNITED METHODIST …CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE OF HO…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesLiving Well Mission Inc — $25,000 · HealthLiving Well Mis…THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · HealthTHE METROHEALTH…COMMUNITY OF BEONAIR PROFESSIONALS INC — $30,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY OF …+1 more — $500 · EducationZELIE'S HOME — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLUMBUS METROPOLITAN CLUB — $5,200 · Recreation & Sports
Other$95,150Philanthropy$48,450Human Services$39,750Health$35,000Education$30,500Housing & Shelter$10,000Recreation & Sports$5,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF SUMMIT AND MEDINA — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF BEONAIR PROFESSIONALS INC — $30,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetGRAND PRAIRIE SERVICES LLC — $25,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO WOMENS BAR FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetCOLUMBUS METROPOLITAN CLUB — $5,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeam NEO Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW ALBANY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPERRYSBURG ROTARY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHELPING HAND CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRACE NETWORK — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Premier Bank FoundationOH15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Premier Bank Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Roetzel & Andress Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph