· Private foundation
Rockwood Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $85k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $141k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLAY ADK | $78,000 |
| THE CORLISS INSTITUTE | $62,500 |
| ADK FOUNDATION | $14,500 |
| KICK IN FOR KIDS | $10,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CHURCHES UNITED OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA | $10,000 |
| FAITH AID | $10,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $10,000 |
| CROSSROADS RI | $10,000 |
| BARRINGTON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| WORLD GOSPEL MISSION | $8,000 |
| FAITHS FOOTSIES | $7,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS NORTHERN NE | $7,000 |
| COMMUNITY PREP SCHOOL | $6,000 |
| LOVELAND FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| HARBOR HOMES INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CORLISS INSTITUTE INC THE6× · 2019–2024 · $393k · revenue +87%- PAPLAY ADK INC6× · 2019–2024 · $197k · revenue +71% · 28% of their budget
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc4× · 2020–2023 · $122k · revenue +73%
Funded once
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +46%- MSMEDICINES SANS FRONTIERSDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERSone grant, 2020 · $10k
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSS NORTHERN NEW ENGLANDone grant, 2022 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
Care dimensions, inc. (cd) enriches quality of life by providing expert care, support, education, and consultation for those affected by life limiting illness, death, and loss.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, trinity health of new england and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the mercy hospital is a member of trinity health of new england…
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eliot Community Human Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CORLISS INSTITUTE INC THE ↗
- Who funds PLAY ADK INC ↗
- Who funds BARRINGTON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds ADK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CHURCHES UNITED OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds KICK IN FOR KIDS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds THE WILDCAT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Oasis Ministries For Spiritual Development Inc ↗
- Who funds Faith Aid ↗
- Who funds PAUL SMITHS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE IN ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL OF THE NORTH COUNTRY INC ↗
- Who funds FAITHS FOOTSIES INC ↗
- Who funds Five Rivers Conservation Trust ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WITH LOVE ↗
- Who funds PAUL SMITHS GABRIELS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc ↗
- Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rockwood Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rockwood Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rockwood Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.