Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rockwood Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Health$578kEducation$322kYouth Development$236kHuman Services$127kPhilanthropy$125kInternational$108kReligion$65kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $141k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAY ADK$78,000
THE CORLISS INSTITUTE$62,500
ADK FOUNDATION$14,500
KICK IN FOR KIDS$10,000
CHRISTIAN CHURCHES UNITED OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA$10,000
FAITH AID$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
CROSSROADS RI$10,000
BARRINGTON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$10,000
WORLD GOSPEL MISSION$8,000
FAITHS FOOTSIES$7,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS NORTHERN NE$7,000
COMMUNITY PREP SCHOOL$6,000
LOVELAND FOUNDATION$5,000
HARBOR HOMES INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $3k → 9%CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL OF THE NC: $3k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $10k → 14%MERCY CHEFS: $2k → 20%RISE AGAIN OUTREACH: $5k → 7%HOPE STATION: $3k → 8%CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL OF THE NC: $3k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $9k → 14%MERCY CHEFS: $2k → 20%CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL OF THE NC: $3k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $7k → 14%CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL OF THE NC: $3k → 14%GOOD NEIGHBORS: $3k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $5k → 14%GOOD NEIGHBORS: $2k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $4k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $4k → 14%CROSSROADS RI: $10k → 14%CROSSROADS RI: $8k → 14%CROSSROADS RI: $7k → 14%CROSSROADS RI: $3k → 14%CROSSROADS RI: $3k → 14%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE: $5k → 16%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE: $5k → 16%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
RI
CO
VA
MD
DC
LA
MS
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 33 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
27

Total granted

$1.6M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+30%

Still filing today

79%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CORLISS INSTITUTE INC THE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $393k · revenue +87%
  • PA
    PLAY ADK INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $197k · revenue +71% · 28% of their budget
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $122k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +46%
  • MS
    MEDICINES SANS FRONTIERSDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND
    one grant, 2022 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
2
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
3
Mercy Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
4
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
6
Care Dimensions Inc

Care dimensions, inc. (cd) enriches quality of life by providing expert care, support, education, and consultation for those affected by life limiting illness, death, and loss.

7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
St Francis Hospital

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
10
The Mercy Hospital Inc

We, trinity health of new england and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the mercy hospital is a member of trinity health of new england…

Health
11
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
12
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eliot Community Human Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsFood Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%20%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%45%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/46
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,519

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
31/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CORLISS INSTITUTE INC THE — $392,500 · OtherCORLISS INSTITUTE INC THECHRISTIAN CHURCHES UNITED OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA — $53,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN CHURCHES UNITED OF THE TRI-COUNTY ARE…WEST BAY CHRISIAN ACADEMY — $44,000 · OtherWEST BAY CHRISIAN ACADEMYWORLD GOSPEL MISSION — $31,000 · OtherOasis Ministries For Spiritual Development Inc — $25,000 · Other+30 more — $175,500 · Other+30 moreBARRINGTON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $165,500 · EducationBARRINGTON CHRIS…Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation — $37,000 · EducationChildren of Fall…THE WILDCAT FOUNDATION — $26,000 · EducationTHE WILDCAT FOUN…PAUL SMITHS COLLEGE — $22,000 · EducationPAUL SMITHS COLL…+1 more — $5,000 · EducationPLAY ADK INC — $197,000 · Youth DevelopmentPLAY ADK INCKICK IN FOR KIDS INCORPORATED — $39,000 · Youth DevelopmentKICK IN FOR KID…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $122,000 · HealthDana-Farb…FAITHS FOOTSIES INC — $7,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — $6,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $5,000 · Health+2 more — $4,000 · HealthADK FOUNDATION — $89,500 · PhilanthropyTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyEXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION — $11,000 · PhilanthropyInternational Rescue Committee INC — $44,000 · InternationalFaith Aid — $23,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $21,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $15,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $10,000 · International+1 more — $2,000 · InternationalTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS — $39,000 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND — $29,000 · Human ServicesHIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE IN — $15,000 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL OF THE NORTH COUNTRY INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesRISE AGAIN OUTREACH INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesGOOD NEIGHBORS INC — $4,000 · Human Services+3 more — $9,500 · Human Services
Other$721,000Education$255,500Youth Development$236,000Health$144,000Philanthropy$120,500International$115,500Human Services$111,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCORLISS INSTITUTE INC THE — $392,500 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetPLAY ADK INC — $197,000 over 6y, 28% of budgetBARRINGTON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $165,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $122,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CHURCHES UNITED OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA — $53,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $44,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS — $39,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKICK IN FOR KIDS INCORPORATED — $39,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation — $37,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND — $29,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILDCAT FOUNDATION — $26,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetOasis Ministries For Spiritual Development Inc — $25,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetFaith Aid — $23,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetPAUL SMITHS COLLEGE — $22,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $21,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE IN — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEXPECT MIRACLES FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL OF THE NORTH COUNTRY INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFive Rivers Conservation Trust — $7,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTOGETHER WITH LOVE — $6,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetPAUL SMITHS GABRIELS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $6,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE AGAIN OUTREACH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSTORMWISE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarbor Homes Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBORS INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOM2MOM ATLANTA SOUTH INC — $3,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE STATION OPPORTUNITY AREA NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL — $3,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MAINE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBATEY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rockwood Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rockwood Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rockwood Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph