· Private foundation
Rochelle Rosenthal Forester and Randolph L Forester Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of ROCHELLE ROSENTHAL FORESTER AND RANDOLPH L FORESTER FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIGHTHOUSE | $5,100 |
| GLEANERS | $5,000 |
| HAVEN | $5,000 |
| FORGOTTEN HARVEST | $4,100 |
| PROXIMITY 2 HUMANITY | $3,000 |
| CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY | $2,650 |
| MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY | $2,600 |
| EDESIA NUTRITION | $2,600 |
| COTS | $2,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $2,000 |
| CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES | $2,000 |
| GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE | $2,000 |
| MOSIAC YOUTH THEATRE OF DETROIT | $2,000 |
| HEIFER INTERNATIONAL | $1,600 |
| COMMON GROUND | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HIHAVEN INC8× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +42%
- CCCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +59%
FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC5× · 2019–2024 · $14k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- DFDPS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $20k
- CHCRANBROOK HOUSE & GARDENSone grant, 2023 · $3k
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.
Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…
To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.
The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.
The michigan humanities council connects people and communities by fostering and creating quality cultural programs
To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.
The organization is dedicated to preservation of michigan great lakes and waterways, maritime history and culture, and provides maritime education opportunities to the public through permanent and changing exhibits, research library, and…
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Hudson Lyric Opera. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds COTS ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
- Who funds GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds EDESIA INC ↗
- Who funds Chicago Children's Museum ↗
- Who funds COMMON GROUND ↗
- Who funds Flint Institute of Arts ↗
- Who funds Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries ↗
- Who funds DMC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC THEATRE ↗
- Who funds THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT ↗
- Who funds MOSAIC YOUTH THEATRE OF DETROIT ↗
- Who funds A HOLE IN THE ROOF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Detroit Historical Society ↗
- Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE HEAT AND WARMTH FUND ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds PROXIMITY 2 HUMANITY CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · The Fred & Barbara Erb Family Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Litvak Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rochelle Rosenthal Forester and Randolph L Forester Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rochelle Rosenthal Forester and Randolph L Forester Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rochelle Rosenthal Forester and Randolph L Forester Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.