· Private foundation
Robert W & Gladys S Meserve Char Trust Hemenway & Barnes LLP
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k36 grants · $89k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB | $7,000 |
| AFS-USA INC | $6,000 |
| AFS INTERCULTURAL PROGRAMS INC | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CASCO BAY | $5,000 |
| PBS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| RAZOM INC | $5,000 |
| CREATIVE CAULDRON INC | $5,000 |
| NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC | $5,000 |
| PREBLE STREET | $3,500 |
| WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA | $3,000 |
| GREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES | $3,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC | $2,500 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOWER MERRIMACK VALLEY | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Trustees of Tufts College6× · 2020–2025 · $63k · revenue +39%
Appalachian Mountain Club6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +92%- CCCreative Cauldron Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +105%
Funded once
- RPREADING PARTNERSone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -38%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +39%
UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTSgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +74%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Afs-Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ukraine House Dc Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds AFS-USA INC ↗
- Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
- Who funds Natural Resources Council of Maine Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CASCO BAY ↗
- Who funds Creative Cauldron Inc ↗
- Who funds AFS INTERCULTURAL PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
- Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds Homeless Health Care Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds PBS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Mid Coast Hunger Prevention Program ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds Portland Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds LAWYERS DEFENDING AMERICAN DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MAINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARRIS CENTER FOR CONSERVATION EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ↗
- Who funds TEDFORD HOUSING ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
- Who funds ESSEX NATIONAL HERITAGE COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY WRITERS ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Maine Public Broadcasting Corporation ↗
- Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Orchard Foundation · Barr Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert W & Gladys S Meserve Char Trust Hemenway & Barnes LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Essex National Heritage Commission Inc — 87% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc — 8% of income from government
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
- Greater Boston Legal Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- American Academy of Arts & Sciences — 3% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robert W & Gladys S Meserve Char Trust Hemenway & Barnes LLP?
Find your warmest path to Robert W & Gladys S Meserve Char Trust Hemenway & Barnes LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.