Loading…
· Public charity
ROBERT TRENT JONES GOLF CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
Raise funds by conducting golf tournaments, charity auctions, and fundraising donation drives.
$198k
Granted FY2024
8
Grants
3
Communities
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Health$492kHuman Services$369kCrime & Legal$142kFood & Nutrition$48kRecreation & Sports$42kArts & Culture$15kOther$240k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
—
2020
—
2022
hunger
2023
hunger
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$70k
Total assets
Largest grants
- SERVE OUR WILLING WARRIORS$30,000
- MANASSAS CITY POLICE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$20,000
- POLICE ASSOCIATION PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY$20,000
- ACTS OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY$20,000
- HAYMARKET REGIONAL FOOD PANTRY$20,000
- CAPITAL CARING$15,000
- THE STATION FOUNDATION$10,000
- HEROES INC$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $369k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 9 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else
9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
9
2
Total granted
$1.3M
$25k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+28%
+476%
Still filing today
89%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE STATION FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $492k · revenue +183%
- SOSERVE OUR WILLING WARRIORS7× · 2018–2024 · $267k · revenue +8%
- PAPOLICE ASSOCIATION PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $122k · revenue +110%
Funded once
- NLNATIONAL LINKS TRUSTgraduated2× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +476%
- TTTHE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING BARN INCone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Special Operations Association
Federal advocacy for the needs and views of the SOCOM community.
Public Benefit
2
Warriors Ascent
Empower Those Who Serve to Heal and Thrive
Health
3
Companions for Heroes
To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.
Human Services
4
WarriorNOW
WarriorNOW was founded as a way to eliminate the stigma associated with Veterans dealing with mental health related concerns, PTSD, and/or addiction.
Health
5
Soww Corp
SOWW Corp was formed for the sole purpose of recognoizing both active and veteran members of our US Special Operations Forces with charitable outdoor events, family retreats, and therapeutic treatments addressing physical wounds and PTSD…
Human Services
6
Warriors Ethos Inc
Provides assistance in the career planning, professional development and placement of veterans, wounded service members and their families throughout their transition.
Employment
7
Workforce Chaplaincy
We provide chaplaincy services to owners, employees and their family members of private companies. Each week our workplace chaplains provide compassionate listening, spiritual care, mental health support, and counseling to support people…
Religion
8
Hero Dogs Inc
Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.
Human Services
9
Warrior Built Foundation Inc
Organized operated exclusively for charitable purposes for combat veterans.
Health
10
The Wounded Blue
Provide trained and caring peer support to injured and disabled officers and their families
Health
11
Operation Warrior Shield
OWS provides support programs for service members, veterans, first responders their families to help heal their hidden wounds to reduce the epidemic of suicide through meditation, wellness programs companion dogs
Human Services
12
Wounded War Heroes
Wounded War Heroes was founded to show our appreciation to the men and women who have been wounded or injured as a result of serving our country, by providing them therapeutic outdoor experiences upon their return home from fighting for…
Public Benefit
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action in Community Through Service of and the most unlike its peers is Haymarket Regional Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$492,000Human Services$369,000Other$239,500Crime & Legal$142,000Food & Nutrition$47,500Recreation & Sports$42,000Arts & Culture$15,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE STATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SERVE OUR WILLING WARRIORS ↗
- Who funds POLICE ASSOCIATION PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL CARING ↗
- Who funds ACTS OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HAYMARKET REGIONAL FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR OUTDOORS INC ↗
- Who funds HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LINKS TRUST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation for NorthernVA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northern · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ROBERT TRENT JONES GOLF CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SERVE OUR WILLING WARRIORS.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~21 months of operating runway; revenue held over 9 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
9 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 460683036 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SERVE OUR WILLING WARRIORS, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 21 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Robert Trent Jones Golf Club Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Robert Trent Jones Golf Club Charitable Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines