Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert S and Mildred Baynard Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$188k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$81kEducation$74kYouth Development$50kHousing & Shelter$45kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$20kAnimals$20kReligion$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $163k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAMPA BAY RESEARCH INSTITUTE$36,000
DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION$22,000
STARTING RIGHT NOW$20,000
YMCA$20,000
WHEELCAIRS 4 KIDS$15,000
ST PETERSBURG COLLEGE$10,000
ST PETERSBURG MUSEUM OF HISTORY$10,000
SPCA$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
TAMPA BAY WATCH$5,000
CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN$5,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$5,000
ST THOMAS CHURCH$5,000
MOREAN ARTCENTER$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%WHEELCAIRS 4 KIDS: $15k → 12%WHEELCAIRS 4 KIDS: $10k → 12%WHEELCAIRS 4 KIDS: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$524k · 16 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$524k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TAMPA BAY RESEACH INSTITUTE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $92k · revenue +377%
  • SR
    STARTING RIGHT NOW
    3× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue +33%
  • DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $64k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -17%
  • HH
    HOPE HEALTH AND SUNSHINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • LU
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation Inc

To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…

Education
2
Usf Research Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.

Education
3
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
4
Florida Atlantic University Foundation Inc

The mission of the florida atlantic university foundation inc. is to encourage, promote, and provide funds and other resources for the benefit of florida atlantic university (a part of the florida state university system) in furtherance of…

Education
5
University of South Florida Alumni Association Inc

The mission of the usf alumni association is to foster a mutually beneficial, lifelong relationship between the university and its alumni; to inspire loyalty and pride among current and future alumni; and to advocate for excellence in…

Education
6
The Florida State University Foundation Inc

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education
7
Tampa Bay Sports Commission Inc

Our mission is to generate social and economic impact throughout the tampa bay region by attracting, promoting and/or organizing youth and amateur sporting events and initiatives.

Recreation & Sports
8
Florida State University Research Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage and facilitate the research and training activities of faculty, staff and students of the florida state university through income from contracts, grants and other sources.

Education
9
University of West Florida Foundation Inc

Soliciting, receiving, and administering gifts and bequests of property and funds for scientific, educational, and charitable purposes all for the advancement of the university of west florida (uwf). to promote and support education and…

Education
10
Florida Polytechnic University Foundation Inc

Established to help sustain the mission of florida polytechnic university to educate students emphasizing science, technology, engineering and mathematics (stem) in an innovative, technology-rich, and interdisciplinary learning environment.

Education
11
Tampa Bay United Inc

See Schedule O.The mission of Tampa Bay United Soccer Club is to create an environment that maximizes the holistic development of the athlete through our values of Integrity, Commitment, Respect, Adaptability, Passion, and Creativity. We…

Recreation & Sports
12
University of Florida Leadership and Education Foundation Inc

The foundation is organized and shall be operated exclusively to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and to make expenditures to or for the benefit of the university of florida. more specifically, the foundation is organized to…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delta Gamma Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hope Health and Sunshine Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TAMPA BAY RESEACH INSTITUTE: $92,000 · OtherTAMPA BAY RESEACH INSTITUTESTARTING RIGHT NOW: $65,000 · OtherSTARTING RIGHT NOWYMCA: $40,000 · OtherYMCAST PETERSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $30,000 · OtherST PETERSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETYST PETERSBURG COLLEGE: $25,000 · OtherST PETERSBURG COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKAST THOMAS CHURCH: $12,000 · Other+4 more: $31,000 · Other+4 moreDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $64,000 · EducationDELTA GAMMA F…+2 more: $1,500 · EducationNortheast Little League Inc: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsNortheast …Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc: $35,000 · Human ServicesTHE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesSPCA INC: $30,000 · AnimalsTAMPA BAY WATCH INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentHOPE HEALTH AND SUNSHINE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Health
Other$335,000Education$65,500Recreation & Sports$50,000Human Services$40,000Animals$30,000Environment$15,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTAMPA BAY RESEACH INSTITUTE: $92,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetSTARTING RIGHT NOW: $65,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $64,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWheelchairs 4 Kids Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetST PETERSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSPCA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTAMPA BAY WATCH INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALPHA TAU OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Francis and Gertrude Levett FoundationFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert S and Mildred Baynard Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert S and Mildred Baynard Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Spca Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert S and Mildred Baynard’s filings →

More from the funding graph