· Private foundation
Robert S and Mildred Baynard Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $132k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHEAST LITTLE LEAGUE | $25,000 |
| DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION | $21,000 |
| YMCA | $20,000 |
| STARTING RIGHT NOW | $20,000 |
| TAMPA BAY RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $16,000 |
| ST PETERSBURG MUSEUM OF HISTORY | $10,000 |
| WHEELCAIRS 4 KIDS | $10,000 |
| SPCA | $10,000 |
| ST PETERSBURG COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| TAMPA BAY WATCH | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA | $5,000 |
| MOREAN ARTCENTER | $3,500 |
| ST THOMAS CHURCH | $2,000 |
| ALPHA TAU OMEGA FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTAMPA BAY RESEACH INSTITUTE2× · 2023–2024 · $56k · revenue +377%
- NLNortheast Little League Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +97%
- SRSTARTING RIGHT NOW2× · 2023–2024 · $45k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- TCTHE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -17%
- HHHOPE HEALTH AND SUNSHINE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $5k
- PFPRISON FELLOWSHIPone grant, 2023 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To secure the financial future of services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities served by the arc tampa bay, inc. (continued on schedule o)this mission is accomplished through a comprehensive plan of building…
See Schedule O.The mission of Tampa Bay United Soccer Club is to create an environment that maximizes the holistic development of the athlete through our values of Integrity, Commitment, Respect, Adaptability, Passion, and Creativity. We…
The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.
To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…
Our mission is to generate social and economic impact throughout the tampa bay region by attracting, promoting and/or organizing youth and amateur sporting events and initiatives.
To provide citizens with independent research on government fiscal policy and to promote the most efficient use of taxpayer dollars
We create and foster engaging, impactful play experiences for children and families to learn and thrive.the museum's vision is to be a vibrant and indispensable part of a community where everyone is included, enabled and empowered to dream…
To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.
Thomas university is an independent, not for profit, institution of higher education with undergraduate and graduate programs that prepare students for successful careers and responsible citizenship in a rapidly changing and complex world.
To promote a culture of environmental stewardship through volunteer and educational opportunities.
The foundation of the palm beach day academy's program is the education of our students in an academically challenging and compassion rich environment that guides each child toward personal excellence of mind, body and character.
To receive and administer funds and property for scientific, educational and charitable purposes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delta Gamma Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hope Health and Sunshine Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TAMPA BAY RESEACH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Northeast Little League Inc ↗
- Who funds STARTING RIGHT NOW ↗
- Who funds DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds SPCA INC ↗
- Who funds ST PETERSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds TAMPA BAY WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds ALPHA TAU OMEGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CEDARS HOME FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE HEALTH AND SUNSHINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert S and Mildred Baynard Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Spca Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.