Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert Nelson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$568k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$635kHousing & Shelter$625kHealth$425kHuman Services$353kPublic Safety & Disaster$127kFood & Nutrition$123kYouth Development$68kInternational$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $88k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $320k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$80,000
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES$80,000
LOS ANGELES MISSION$35,000
HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS$35,000
JOVENES INC$30,000
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION$30,000
UNION RESCUE MISSION$30,000
THE MUSIC CENTER$25,000
CHILDRENS LAW CENTER OF CA$20,000
HCRI INC (HEALTH COMMUNICATION RESEARCH)$20,000
LA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOUNDATION$20,000
KENT ISD$15,000
WISE READERS TO LEADERS$15,000
CITY OF GRANDVILLE$15,000
THE HEALTH COMMUNICATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $435k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 14%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $10k → 10%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $35k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $30k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $35k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $20k → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $15k → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $10k → 14%KINGS TABLE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%ARTISTS CREATING TOGETHER: $10k → 11%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%HARVEST HOME: $5k → 14%PROJECT ROPA: $10k → 14%THE LAUNDRY TRUCK LA: $5k → 14%ABBEY ROAD: $50k → 14%JOVENES INC: $30k → 14%JOVENES INC: $5k → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS: $2k → 14%ADVOCACY FOR RESPECT & CHOICE - LONG BEACH: $5k → 14%END HOMELESSNESS CALIFORNIA: $5k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%PROJECT ROPA: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%PROJECT ROPA: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 22 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
52

Total granted

$1.3M
$990k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+4%

Still filing today

73%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $240k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationCivil RightsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UR
    UNION RESCUE MISSION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $200k · revenue +67%
  • HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $90k · revenue +45%
  • MA
    Minority Aids Project Los Angeles
    4× · 2021–2025 · $80k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $80k · revenue -55%
  • PL
    Penny Lane Centers
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +16%
  • AR
    ABBEY ROAD INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +181%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Housing Works

Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.

Housing & Shelter
2
Family Promise of Los Angeles

Family promise of the south bay assists families experiencing housing insecurity with short-term shelter, case management, and navigation with the goal of creating a sustainable solution for their family.

Human Services
3
Hunger Action Los Angeles Inc

Hunger action los angeles ends hunger and promotes healthy eating through advocacy, education, and appropriate direct service. the chief program area currently is the market match prgram operated by hala at 22 farmers markets in la county…

Education
4
Lafh Permanent Housing Corp

Lafh permanent housing corp. i (casa central) has been established to own a 6-unit complex located in los angeles, california, which provides permanent housing for families with low income.

Housing & Shelter
5
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
6
Farm2People

Farm2People's mission is to secure local harvests and fight hunger in Greater Los Angeles.

Food & Nutrition
7
Cangress Dba Los Angeles Community Action Network

Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.

Community Improvement
8
La Casa de las Madres

La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…

—
9
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
10
Project Angel Food

Project angel food (the organization) improves health and fights food insecurity for critically ill individuals in los angeles county through its medically tailored meal program and nutrition counseling. for over 35 years, they have served…

Health
11
La Family Housing Corporation

L.a. family housing corporation and its affiliated organizations help homeless and low-income families and individuals of the greater los angeles area transition out of poverty and create lasting stability by providing a comprehensive…

—
12
Food On Foot

Food on foot is a nonprofit dedicated to assisting our unhoused and low-income neighbors in los angeles with nutritious meals, clothing, and a fresh start through life-skills training, full-time employment, and permanent housing.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Health Communication Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
30/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $290,000 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYMinority Aids Project Los Angeles: $80,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES: $80,000 · OtherPenny Lane Centers: $75,000 · OtherTHE MUSIC CENTER: $70,000 · Other+61 more: $993,700 · Other+61 moreUNION RESCUE MISSION: $200,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSIO…HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $90,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY TRAILS FOR KI…ABBEY ROAD INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesABBEY ROAD INCJOVENES INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesJOVENES INCProject Ropa: $21,000 · Human Services+10 more: $59,000 · Human Services+10 moreLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $245,000 · Housing & ShelterLOS ANGELES…SAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $16,000 · Housing & ShelterSAFE HAVEN …FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationLEADERSHIP STOCKTON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $28,500 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationWISE READERS TO LEADERS: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGRAND RAPIDS POLICE FOUNDATION: $4,995 · Public Safety & DisasterFOOD FORWARD INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD CLUBS: $10,000 · Food & NutritionWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $5,000 · Food & NutritionHAND2HAND: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,588,700Human Services$455,000Housing & Shelter$271,000Education$140,500Youth Development$50,000Public Safety & Disaster$44,995Food & Nutrition$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $245,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $200,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $90,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMinority Aids Project Los Angeles: $80,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetPenny Lane Centers: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABBEY ROAD INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWISE READERS TO LEADERS: $50,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetProject Ride Inc: $45,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJOVENES INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLEADERSHIP STOCKTON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS YOUTH COMMONWEALTH INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $28,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOKIZU FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC: $26,200 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBEYOND 26 INC: $21,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetProject Ropa: $21,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD FORWARD INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARTISTS CREATING TOGETHER: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLLYWOOD POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetUNITED WAY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD CLUBS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENT SENIOR CITIZEN NUTRITION PROGRAM INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAGGIES MISSION CAFE: $6,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE KING'S TABLE MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAND2HAND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA of San Gabriel Valley: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHarvest Home Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAdvocacy for Respect and Choice- Long Beach Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS POLICE FOUNDATION: $4,995 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetPathpoint: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLove On 4 Paws Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Minority Aids Project Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds Penny Lane Centers ↗
  • Who funds ABBEY ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds WISE READERS TO LEADERS ↗
  • Who funds Project Ride Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOVENES INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP STOCKTON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS YOUTH COMMONWEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OKIZU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND 26 INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Ropa ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA26.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Shelter Partnership Inc · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation · The Mercantile Bank Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert Nelson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert Nelson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert Nelson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert Nelson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert Nelson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph